What is the worst movie you've ever seen? What made it so bad?

For me, it was the movie Hounddog.

I feel like a chronically depressed atheist decided to make a move, based around the idea that life is meaningless and the only escape from this worldly hell is the sweet embrace of death. The movie features a boring young girl (played by Dakota Fanning), who lives in the most empty, meaningless patch of the American South, with an utterly useless family. The movie has no continues plot or message, other than watching worse and worse things happen to this poor girl, for no reason whatsoever. I'm not going to bother listing all the bad things that happen to her, because they're all depressing and pointless. If you want a movie to convince you that there is no God, this is the movie for you. It won't make you cry. It'll just leave you feeling like an empty husk of a human being, with no motivation or joy left in your life.

Gawd I hated that movie. Even thinking about it makes me depressed.

Movie 43.

If you ever wondered what a bunch of actors losing every ounce of dignity and goodwill they had with audiences looked like this is the movie for you. Because who doesn't want to see terrible sketch comedy in movie form. You think Hugh Jackman with a pair of testicles on his chin is a funny sight gag? How about Chloe Grace Moretz learning the comical experience of having her period? Oh, but don't forgot about everyone's new favorite funny man Chris Pratt and his wacky adventures with fecal matter in the bedroom! And that's just three of the some-odd dozen terrible, tasteless, humorless vignettes that await you for 90 minutes of agony in Movie 43

Movie 43.

If you ever wondered what a bunch of actors losing every ounce of dignity and goodwill they had with audiences looked like this is the movie for you. Because who doesn't want to see terrible sketch comedy in movie form. You think Hugh Jackman with a pair of testicles on his chin is a funny sight gag? How about Chloe Grace Moretz learning the comical experience of having her period? Oh, but don't forgot about everyone's new favorite funny man Chris Pratt and his wacky adventures with fecal matter in the bedroom! And that's just three of the some-odd dozen terrible, tasteless, humorless vignettes that await you for 90 minutes of agony in Movie 43

Oh wow, that sounds horrible. Can't believe I've never heard of it!

I have many films in mind but I would say Alien vs Predator. More so the second film than the first.

The film was very dark and so you either watch complete darkness or what complete darkness with a brighter contrast setting on your TV. The films felt very bias as well, clearly the films favoured the Predators to the Xenomorphs. I love the Xenomorphs for their design and concept, alien and technology are rather boring. I also dislike the film because this what caused Weaver to kill her character off even if she was in the sequel because she hated the idea of it. Also, Cameron decided not to direct it because he also hated the idea of the AVP movies. None of the main characters were rememberable or even good for that matter. The crossbreed was a total mistake as well but then again I think the crossover was a mistake in itself. But then I think most crossovers are bad unless they are from the same company and creators like Marvel's X-Men Vs The Avengers. The plot was weak as well and I guess is best to look on Wikipedia if you want to know of the plot in general.

Films I would have brought up if it were not AVP:

2012
The Babadook
Anything post Scary Movie 2

I know there are more but I won't list them.

Ex Machina - worst version of the Terminator ever.

Avatar- over used plot, too much sfx(headache galore), typical humanity and military bad, nature good story...blah.

This is my easy winner. If you ever need a laugh, rent this movie and think about how Uwe Boll spent $60 million on it.

Enough, everyone.

The answer to this is Catwoman.

In every sense of the word with how big it was supposed to be as a major motion picture: I have to consider this the most colossal failure of all time.

Hyperbole? I only need to watch the basketball scene to know it's not hyperbole.

There are a lot that come to mind. I could probably spend several paragraphs listing all of them, but I'm feeling lazy, so I won't. Instead, I'll just list the one that's on top of my shitpile of a list of movies that sucked so much ass that they make anal porn videos look like saturday morning cartoons.

Jupiter Ascending

You want to talk about one of the worst movies to come out in our time? This would be it. It had bad acting, bad writing, worse direction, and it was one of the few films that Sean Bean didn't die. Like, come on now!? I'm ripping this straight from JeremyJahns: if there was ever a movie for Sean Bean to die in, this one would be it. God, this movie sucked all kinds of dick that I just can't even fathom why the guys behind The Matrix Trilogy and 50% of the brainpower behind Sense8 could produce this kind of trash. They tried to make Channing Tatum a serious actor - well, congratulation. You made him seriously suck. I tip my hat off to you two fucktards. Oh and they made Mila Kunis as interesting as watching a bobblehead doll after its head stopped bobbling side-to-side.

Of course the actual answer is Plan 9 from Outer Space. And conveniently it's available free on youtube:

Three freaking words...

The Last Airbender.

Yes, based off the TV show. Never watch it! It's probably the worst movie ever. Bad directing, bad acting, named pronounced in the Asian style (not the tv style). Cut out so many important plot points.

It took 20 guys to do a choreographed dance just to move a small Boulder. Enough said.

My adivce, buy the movie and either bury it in your backyard for 20 years and show it to your descendants or destroy the DVD. Nobody liked this movie.

In a past life (two years ago), I was a journalist and I interviewed the guy that voiced Appa and Momo in the tv show and I asked him about the movie. Which he simply responded, "Don't get me started on that movie."

It's bad.

There are a lot that come to mind. I could probably spend several paragraphs listing all of them, but I'm feeling lazy, so I won't. Instead, I'll just list the one that's on top of my shitpile of a list of movies that sucked so much ass that they make anal porn videos look like saturday morning cartoons.

Jupiter Ascending

You want to talk about one of the worst movies to come out in our time? This would be it. It had bad acting, bad writing, worse direction, and it was one of the few films that Sean Bean didn't die. Like, come on now!? I'm ripping this straight from JeremyJahns: if there was ever a movie for Sean Bean to die in, this one would be it. God, this movie sucked all kinds of dick that I just can't even fathom why the guys behind The Matrix Trilogy and 50% of the brainpower behind Sense8 could produce this kind of trash. They tried to make Channing Tatum a serious actor - well, congratulation. You made him seriously suck. I tip my hat off to you two fucktards. Oh and they made Mila Kunis as interesting as watching a bobblehead doll after its head stopped bobbling side-to-side.

That was a god damn classic. How dare you.

Jupiter Ascends, pleb!

sarcasm?.....

....

maybe.

Shhhh

Oh and they made Mila Kunis as interesting as watching a bobblehead doll after its head stopped bobbling side-to-side.

So that's a step up from how she normally is. Kudos to the Wachowskis.

<Snipped quote by Altered Tundra>

So that's a step up from how she normally is. Kudos to the Wachowskis.

Um, no. She's a great actress, but the Waqchowskis just didn't know how to handle her. Legit, you can be the best actor in the world, but if you are paired with a bad director, you'll be shit. You need an example, look to The Happening. M. Night took a very capable actor like Mark Wahlberg, and made him quite possibly the most stone-faced actor, worse than Taylor Lautner.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Um, no. She's a great actress, but the Waqchowskis just didn't know how to handle her. Legit, you can be the best actor in the world, but if you are paired with a bad director, you'll be shit. You need an example, look to The Happening. M. Night took a very capable actor like Mark Wahlberg, and made him quite possibly the most stone-faced actor, worse than Taylor Lautner.

I mean, I get what you're saying but that's a real bad example because Mark Wahlberg is a bad actor regardless of director. One can count the number of good performances he's given on one hand. And the fault can't always be given to the director, that's an easy out. Daniel Day Lewis was real bad in Nine but Rob Marshall is an...okayish director. M. Night used to be a noted director before everyone realized he was a hack, but he's not terrible.

Then again, Al Pacino won an Oscar for Scent of a Woman so maybe there's merit to good actors giving shitbad performances

Why is Rubber not on this list? Well I take that back, I should be appreciative that such an atrocity has failed to make itself well-known. It's literally a garbage film about a serial killing car tire. But I must admit that I couldn't get halfway through, it was much too slow and boring for me (aside from the poor plot and directing).

<Snipped quote by Altered Tundra>

I mean, I get what you're saying but that's a real bad example because Mark Wahlberg is a bad actor regardless of director. One can count the number of good performances he's given on one hand. And the fault can't always be given to the director, that's an easy out. Daniel Day Lewis was real bad in Nine but Rob Marshall is an...okayish director. M. Night used to be a noted director before everyone realized he was a hack, but he's not terrible.

Then again, Al Pacino won an Oscar for Scent of a Woman so maybe there's merit to good actors giving shitbad performances

I know you're a film major or something of the like(I forget which it was), but I have to disagree with you again. I mean, I'm not saying that MArk is the best actor of all time, far from it, but what you're saying is completely preposterous. Saying that he is a bad actor regardless of which director he is working under is a bit much, no? He's had plenty of great movies, be it comedy, drama, or whatever, where he shined. I believe he won quite the amount of awards for his work in Lone Survivor. Plus there are several other movies he's been in such as Four Brothers, The Fighter, and others where he proved to be a very capable actor. No, I'm not saying all of this because I'm a fan of his. I mean, yeah, I like his work, but this extends far beyond being a fan. This is simply the person who knows good acting talent when he sees it.

You may disagree like I disagreed with your assessment about Mila, but this is my opinion about it.

And about M. Night, yes he is terrible. He's one of the worst directors out there. Legit everything after The Sixth Sense except Hell because that was surprisingly decent has been total shit - The Happening, After Earth, The Last Airbender, The Village - all were some of the worst films to ever be made. If you say otherwise, then idk what to tell you there.

There is no other argument. It's been called the 'Citizen Kane of bad movies'. It's filled with plot holes and inconsistencies, there's a bizarre amount of sex scenes and the soundtrack is terrible. The acting is more wooden than the set pieces.

First piece of evidence. "I DID NAUGHT HIT HER, I DID NAAAAUGGGHHHTTT. Oh hi Mark."

Second piece of evidence. "Dahnt tauch me motduhfucka, get outt." "cheep cheep cheep cheep"

Third piece of evidence

Tommy Wiseau (the black haired vampire looking guy) wrote, directed, produced and starred in it. He somehow came up with $6 million for the budget of the film, an amount he still hasn't explained how he got. No one knows where he came from, his accent makes no sense. I personally think he's a hardcore character actor who went to deep into his created character. It's so bad it's good. Seth Rogan and James Franco are making a film about the making of it.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

I know you're a film major or something of the like(I forget which it was), but I have to disagree with you again. I mean, I'm not saying that MArk is the best actor of all time, far from it, but what you're saying is completely preposterous. Saying that he is a bad actor regardless of which director he is working under is a bit much, no? He's had plenty of great movies, be it comedy, drama, or whatever, where he shined. I believe he won quite the amount of awards for his work in Lone Survivor. Plus there are several other movies he's been in such as Four Brothers, The Fighter, and others where he proved to be a very capable actor. No, I'm not saying all of this because I'm a fan of his. I mean, yeah, I like his work, but this extends far beyond being a fan. This is simply the person who knows good acting talent when he sees it.

He's been in good movies but with the exception of Boogie Nights the movies have never been good thanks to him. In The Departed he was outclassed by literally everyone, The Fighter had three people from the cast that wasn't him be up for acting awards - two of them went on to win, and Three Kings was carried largely by George Clooney and David O. Russell's directing, which didn't help out Mark much in I Heart Huckabees OR The Fighter.

Mark Wahlberg is not a good actor. The reason why he worked so well in Boogie Nights is because his whole 'wide eyed wonder oh wow' thing fit the character and the story and he's been doing it ever since. The few times he's stopped acting as if everything he's saying is incredulous and a question are the few times he's been recognized, like The Departed where he finally got to be the Boston bro he is. See also: Ted. The Mark Wahlberg from The Happening is indistinguishable from the one in Transformers or the one from Pain and Gain or the one from The Gambler. He's one of the most typecast actors working today because he has no range. Chances are good if it's a Mark Wahlberg picture that he's playing a cop or a criminal.

Also as far as I'm aware, the only award he won for Lone Survivor was a Critic's Choice for Actor in an Action Movie and his competition was Man of Steel, Iron Man 3, and World War Z. He was also nominated for a Teen's Choice Award but we all know about those damn teens.

You may disagree like I disagreed with your assessment about Mila, but this is my opinion about it.

And that's fine, just like how my opinion is that Mark Wahlberg is a bad actor. My thoughts on the guy don't invalidate yours.

And about M. Night, yes he is terrible. He's one of the worst directors out there. Legit everything after The Sixth Sense except Hell because that was surprisingly decent has been total shit - The Happening, After Earth, The Last Airbender, The Village - all were some of the worst films to ever be made. If you say otherwise, then idk what to tell you there.

You're forgetting Unbreakable, which is actually the best movie he's ever made, and The Visit which was shockingly acceptable all things considered. The Happening is a bad movie, as are most movies in the his filmography but saying that any of them are the worst films? That's a bit of a stretch. Discounting the indie things like The Room or a Neil Breen wonder, there's still a level of competency about film making in any given M. Night movie. Well, except for After Earth but that's what happens when you have Will Smith doing a vanity project with his kid and pass the script around various people to put their own touches on it. The worst thing M. Night ever did was cast himself in The Lady in the Water as the savior of mankind or whatever the hell that masturbatory role was.

There are far, far worse movies out there that make even The Happening look good. M. Night makes bad movies and always has, but they're watchably bad, give or take one's fan level of The Last Airbender and how hilariously angry it makes them. The same can't be said for like...Glitter or Santa With Muscles (starring Mila Kunis!). M. Night is like Michael Bay in that he's an easy target for people to be like "Oh man what a shit director" but both him and Bay don't deserve the vitriol they get. Both get shit on for ruining cartoons people love.

There are worse directors out there. I mean, Brett Ratner is out there right now probably up to no good.

I'm just gonna... leave this here...