In any case actual news reported is as a comment by an EU official, not the Don.
So we are placing value in the word of some know-nothing European Union official that much? Here is what was said then.
Miguel Arias Cañete told reporters on Saturday: “The U.S. has stated that they will not renegotiate the Paris accord, but they will try to review the terms on which they could be engaged under this agreement.”
The "actual" news who reported it was none other than the Wall Street Journal, who had the above statement terribly wrong. In fact, so wrong that it flies in the face of this:
When Trump officially announced his plans to withdraw from the Paris Agreement in June, he said he’d be willing to “immediately work with Democratic leaders,” either to “negotiate the U.S. back into Paris” or devise a new pact.
Since then, the administration hasn’t officially announced any new policies on the climate change agreement, nor has it provided any details on what a renegotiation with the accord would look like.
Which even the biased Huffington Post acknowledged.
This turn of events is actually a targeted attack, similar to the "DACA announcement" that the President had been involved in days before. The reason I call this a "targeted attack" is because it was accompanied by a massive surge in the Shareblue personnel and computer botnet, many of whom posed as "Trump supporters" and flooded social media sites affiliated with his backers, be it 4chan, Reddit, Breitbart, Facebook, etc. This is where the cry of "Trump's base is abandoning him." rose from, owing to the paid shills or opposition actors and whose go-to tactic is debasing attempts. Do not believe me, let them say it for themselves:
