It all comes off in tone right. Yes in this chat the tone was negative against click bait.
And you are also negative against clickbait?
Of course, in the sense that the content is not the content that was suggested by the name.
It all comes off in tone right. Yes in this chat the tone was negative against click bait.
And you are also negative against clickbait?
<Snipped quote by Gareth>
Of course, in the sense that the content is not the content that was suggested by the name.
I dunno how deep we're getting, but if it's a thread with a title that leads me to assume the contents are not well connected with the title, then I simply write off the thread and possibly the roleplayer.
Otherwise, it doesn't really matter to me.
In the original context of "omg look old stuff WITH A TWIST" then it depends on the person posting that, the wording used and even then, probably the content.
<Snipped quote by ArenaSnow>
You seem too picky to me.
<Snipped quote by Gareth>
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Good thing we have no obligation to roleplay with each other, I suppose.
<Snipped quote by ArenaSnow>
Lmao i could go into details but I thought i'd spare you. Its interesting how we both went for the jugular.
@ArenaSnow
Ok, I'll talk more I guess.
I wasn't really into depth when I mentioned clickbait.
It's only people who want to grab a person's attention with their title, so that they can have traffic to their story idea.
you mentioned:
a thread with a title that leads me to assume the contents are not well connected with the title.
I don't know how to know that.
<Snipped quote by Gareth>
Poor wording on my part.
It was intended to be more like this:
<interesting title about fantasy world with killer ponies> (humor me)
<click into thread>
<thread has typical fantasy world where people eat oranges>
<??? where's my ponies>
<oh, the ponies don't matter, but please, take these ora->
<goodbye>
@Scott Silverado
Meh,
I can live with it. Unless if it's 1x1 it really doesn't matter in my book