Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Gowi
Raw
OP
Avatar of Gowi

Gowi

Member Seen 1 yr ago

Can I get a headcount to see who is still with us while I work on this tonight?
Hidden 8 yrs ago 8 yrs ago Post by shylarah
Raw
Avatar of shylarah

shylarah the crazy one

Member Seen 9 hrs ago

*lurks aggressively*

For what it's worth, I am a fan of narrativist systems (focus on story, not on mechanics, stats, and dice) and I use the words fluff and crunch. My understanding is that crunch is numbers, statistics, and the hard and fast rules of the setting. Fluff is...what makes it believable, relatable, and creates the story. If you're sticking in details people don't want and don't like, the term I would use would be filler or padding. Fluff is a good thing. It just uses a different method.

As a complete aside, my favored tabletop/dice system of the ones I've used seems to be FATE. Mostly because there is a rule that says "If both outcomes of a roll of the dice are not interesting, don't bother rolling and go with the interesting one."

@Shoryu Magami@Ailyn Evensen Oh look who I found! *waves to*
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Tojin
Raw
Avatar of Tojin

Tojin literal sea monster

Member Seen 5 mos ago

Still here!
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by NarcissisticPotato
Raw
Avatar of NarcissisticPotato

NarcissisticPotato Dirty on the Outside, Fluffy on the Inside

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

Believe me I am still alive~!
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Shoryu Magami
Raw
Avatar of Shoryu Magami

Shoryu Magami π”Šπ”²π”žπ”―π”‘π”¦π”žπ”« 𝔬𝔣 𝔄𝔰𝔠𝔒𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔬𝔫

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

@shylarah
Yo.

Not to get too away from the topic, but I'll respond to you here instead of the hang-out, just to be less confusing.

I'm just used to 'fluff' being used as a derogative term by people who dislike details -- considering we had a discussion recently about people thinking stuff is 'detail-porn', you already know how I feel about that sort of perspective. Since whether or not certain details are good - or are wanted - is entirely subjective, referring to them as things like 'filler' or 'padding' isn't all that mature in my eyes; however, I'm pretty much used to people using the term 'fluff' in this context too -- the fact that you use it in less of a derogative sense is fair enough, but I'm not used to it.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Gowi
Raw
OP
Avatar of Gowi

Gowi

Member Seen 1 yr ago

Filler/Fluff/Padding/etc is neither negative or positive. =)
1x Like Like 1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by MissCapnCrunch
Raw
Avatar of MissCapnCrunch

MissCapnCrunch PᴏʟΙͺᴛᴇ & Pα΄‡α΄„α΄œΚŸΙͺα΄€Κ€ / PΙͺʀᴀᴛᴇ PΚ€Ιͺɴᴄᴇss

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

@Gowi

I am very much still here and very much still interested.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by shylarah
Raw
Avatar of shylarah

shylarah the crazy one

Member Seen 9 hrs ago

@Shoryu Magami I learned about the terms through /tg/ people, where fluff and crunch are two halves of a whole. So that's where most of my ideas for that come from. Also there's fluff like...feelsy-things, and that's good too, but a different concept. <3

@Gowi Padding and filler have negative connotations (at least to me) because the implication is that they are unneeded -- it's stuff you're adding, be it for wordcount or just to look impressive. Fluff and crunch merely describe the type of details you're working with.

@MissCapnCrunch Your SN and signature are timely and highly amusing. <3
1x Thank Thank
Hidden 8 yrs ago 8 yrs ago Post by Shoryu Magami
Raw
Avatar of Shoryu Magami

Shoryu Magami π”Šπ”²π”žπ”―π”‘π”¦π”žπ”« 𝔬𝔣 𝔄𝔰𝔠𝔒𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔬𝔫

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

@shylarah

Since whether or not certain details are good - or are wanted - is entirely subjective, referring to them as things like 'filler' or 'padding' isn't all that mature in my eyes; however, I'm pretty much used to people using the term 'fluff' in this context too -- the fact that you use it in less of a derogative sense is fair enough, but I'm not used to it.
Shoryu Magami

Based off what I just said, which more or less got seconded by Gowi's comment, it's far too subjective to refer to any particular detail as being unneeded. We've already had a pretty lengthy discussion in the hang-out about how one seemingly 'meaningless' detail could have plenty of value to another person, so as far as I'm concerned people who use terms like 'filler' or 'padding' as an insult are trying to push their opinions on other writers, which is immature. Also, there's nothing 'wrong' with wanting to add details in to make your work look impressive, since it means the world or character isn't being half-assed.

@Gowi
A lot of shit's come up on my end, so assume I can't take on another role-play right now.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by MissCapnCrunch
Raw
Avatar of MissCapnCrunch

MissCapnCrunch PᴏʟΙͺᴛᴇ & Pα΄‡α΄„α΄œΚŸΙͺα΄€Κ€ / PΙͺʀᴀᴛᴇ PΚ€Ιͺɴᴄᴇss

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

My opinion of filler is, it's important to an extent.

It's kind of like getting dressed in the morning-
I know damn well I could go naked and get everything done- but if I put some clothes on I'm going to have a better day.
If I decide to put on some accessories and a dab of makeup it'll be even more nice; but not necessary cause I was fine as just normal me.
However, if I go get my nails did, hair did, thats over the top- heck yeah I look good, but man, it's a lot of work.

Plus I was fine being naked
1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by shylarah
Raw
Avatar of shylarah

shylarah the crazy one

Member Seen 9 hrs ago

@MissCapnCrunch@Shoryu Magami I'm looking at the use of the word itself. Just as tenacity and determination have a positive connotation and pigheaded or stubborn tend to be more negative, fluff is a positive (or at least neutral) word in my head, and filler or padding leans toward the negative. This is a discussion of the merit of the word itself, and not of whether the particular details are relevant, necessary, or desired. It sounds like in Shoryu's case, just about any blanket term will have a negative connotation because any of them can be used for bashing, unless the word incorporates an assumed necessity from the start (and so can't mean something unwanted). I was simply explaining my attitude towards said words, and how I generally see them used.
1x Like Like
Hidden 8 yrs ago 8 yrs ago Post by Shoryu Magami
Raw
Avatar of Shoryu Magami

Shoryu Magami π”Šπ”²π”žπ”―π”‘π”¦π”žπ”« 𝔬𝔣 𝔄𝔰𝔠𝔒𝔫𝔰𝔦𝔬𝔫

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

It sounds like in Shoryu's case, just about any blanket term will have a negative connotation because any of them can be used for bashing, unless the word incorporates an assumed necessity from the start (and so can't mean something unwanted).

That's not an inaccurate analysis of how I view things, to be honest. Let's just say that since I'm used to seeing people bash things far more often than actually present constructive or unbiased opinions regarding them (the need for me to come into this thread pages back and shoot down the people who were bashing the lore of this role-play is an excellent example, and actually remains on the topic at the same time), I'll usually expect this to be the intentions unless the person clarifies.

Particularly on the internet - where tone of voice is absent - clarity is essentially, so if a person is going to use words that hold mixed implications then they should present their stance more clearly to make sure the details of their words aren't missed. Just calling something 'fluff' and leaving it at that is incredibly vague and frankly just fishes for flame wars. This is one of the reasons my OOC posts tend to be pretty long -- making sure no one misreads me unless they're looking for arguments.

With that being said, I agree that words usually hold inherent positive or negative connotations, even if it's not something I particularly have a lot of respect for since a lot of problems are created when someone takes a word with subjective applications and tries to say there's a 'right' way to use it. I'm not suggesting that's what you're doing, but more just pointing out it's one of the problems with the English language.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by The Irish Tree
Raw
Avatar of The Irish Tree

The Irish Tree Hot-Blooded Loser

Member Seen 7 hrs ago

@Gowi

I've still got my interest in this.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Assallya
Raw
Avatar of Assallya

Assallya HP: -10

Member Seen 8 days ago

I'm still here
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Shin
Raw
Avatar of Shin

Shin

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

A bit late to the headcount, but I'm still in and very excited.
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Gowi
Raw
OP
Avatar of Gowi

Gowi

Member Seen 1 yr ago

This is all very good! I know it’s been too long for some people’s tastes between Interest Check and OOC, but I’m working with NP to get things fluid and functional as quickly as we canβ€” this was my birthday weekend so a lot of people wanted to take my time away from the computer (or away from RPG) so I should be transparent with that. Will work some more tonight before bed.
4x Like Like
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Shin
Raw
Avatar of Shin

Shin

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

@Gowi

Take your time! Happy belated birthday!
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by MissCapnCrunch
Raw
Avatar of MissCapnCrunch

MissCapnCrunch PᴏʟΙͺᴛᴇ & Pα΄‡α΄„α΄œΚŸΙͺα΄€Κ€ / PΙͺʀᴀᴛᴇ PΚ€Ιͺɴᴄᴇss

Member Seen 2 yrs ago

@Gowi

Happy belated birthday cutie!
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by Tojin
Raw
Avatar of Tojin

Tojin literal sea monster

Member Seen 5 mos ago

Happy late birthday, my friend! And don't worry (much) about the time you're taking; the more time spent working on it, the more polished the final result is going to be!
1x Like Like
Hidden 8 yrs ago Post by The Irish Tree
Raw
Avatar of The Irish Tree

The Irish Tree Hot-Blooded Loser

Member Seen 7 hrs ago

@Gowi

Merry belated birthmas!
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet