I think it still falls in the range of extreme-near future, at least as far as both cryo-stasis, interfacing neurologically with computers, and AIs. I am far more a fan of science-fiction than science-fantasy, and I like my technology plausible. For example:
We know that many amphibians hibernate by use of increased glucose levels within their bodies, allowing them to survive freezing temperatures without the cell walls rupturing. An injected solution prior to entering the cryo-beds might provide the same benefits for humans. A side effect of this could be making subjects prone to diabetes, which would in turn be countered by diet once they awake: rationing and strictly controlled food preparation would help with recovery.
The neuro-computer interface is stretching things a bit, I admit, but then again consider both the HUD technology used by some military pilots today; it allows them to access information, execute commands, track and fire, and all with eye movement. Combine that with the implants that now exist which digitally restore sight and hearing to blind and deaf people respectively, sensory deprivations tanks (which have existed for decades) and virtual reality headsets (both commercial and military training units). All of the wires and tubes the NI-Techs have to wear are for medical monitoring and (ahem) biological maintenance.
Artificial Intelligence. It can be argued that the last twenty years we have seen great strides in this area, especially by Japanese researchers for getting machines to recognize emotional states and respond in kind. And it is estimated that we will have computers capable of passing prolonged Turing Test experiments by 2029, just a few years before the launch of the the
Copernicus.
That said? Play with shit! Have fun with it! Almost anything can be plausible when looked at the right way. Heck, lightsabers could theoretically be made according to some researchers from Harvard!
http://www.cnet.com/news/science-trumps-the-force-to-create-a-real-life-lightsaber/ (Although, I still have doubts as to its practicality as a weapon or a tool.)