Mammalia said
So I decided that I would compose a list of all the conditions that would have to be met for life to form out of non-life according to the evolutionary perspective, just in case I ever encounter someone talking about it on the internet:In order for life to possibly form from non-life, when the lightning struck:A sufficient amount of amino acids would have to be formed (countless)All amino acids would have to be either right or left-handed (experiments produce both)All the right proteins would have to be formed (countless)For each protein to be formed, odds of over 4 quadrilion to one would have to be overcomeAll the right proteins must form the various parts of the cell (each of which are very complex)All of this must happen all at onceAll of this must happen with everything forming in exactly the right placesThere should be no left-over proteins or amino acids that could poison the cellThe cell must find foodThe cell must survive an atmosphere that is poisonous to it (the cell speculated to be the first cell wasn't fit for its environment)
First, you're assuming things that aren't necessarily what happened. So, in order:
Not true.*
>Not well enough informed on the subject to talk about<
Not true in the slightest.**
This severely underestimates the number of... well, THINGS, if you consider this a deterring factor.
Not true at all.**
Absolutely not true.***
Not the case at all.**
Not true.****
This is not a deterring factor.****
Not really the case.*****
*:You're assuming that all first life had to come from a single event. This discounts the fact that there are trillions upon trillions upon trillions upon trillions of events happening every second, and that this would not have to happen in X time period. It most likely took thousands of years just to form the first actual cell. The real likelihood is that a pseudovirus was the first pseudo life, not a cell. Obviously, assuming that these protolife viruses were like modern day viruses, which there is no real reason to believe due to 4.5 billion years of change, they would die quickly until protocells began to come into existence to be a food source.
**: This not only assumes that there was a single event that created all of the required pieces, but also that these pieces would create a cell in an impossibly short period of time and that the cells would be similar to modern day cells, which there is little reason to assume. It also assumes that the pieces would have to become life immediately, which is in no way the case.
***: You're assuming something that there is literally zero reason to assume. This also requires that everything happened from a single event, which is not what anyone thinks was the case.
****: These leftovers were most likely: 1. nowhere near where the life would be once formed, due to the violence of the environment. 2. would potentially be a food source.
**** (con't): You, again, assume that these first lifes were very similar to modern cells, which is not only unlikely but almost definitely not the case.
*****: Unless you're going to claim that the environment would tear apart these first lifes immediately, this is not the case. Firstly, the theory is that it formed within water, somewhat protected by the atmosphere. Not only that, but this assumes that it would be complex enough for the atmosphere to matter.
One sec, I'll give you a better explained version of what science thinks happened.
