@duck55223I sent you my minor civ's profile a few days ago in PMs.
I'd be interested to know if they're allowed or not.
I'd be interested to know if they're allowed or not.
Anti-matter annihilation cannons are still the best thing you could ever have, doe.
Cud MAAAGGGGIIIICCCC.
No, theoretical support.
Granted: Magic is golden for this, and it's why I'm trying to monopylize use it.
Uh, the history of the humans comes from the humans in the main RP set in the Milky Way. The Terrans there never invented a Jump Drive, unless this Jump Drive also happened to have caused them to run amok and end up in a entirely different universe....So? When did you plan to tell me any of this?
Oh, Wilson's gone. Sweet.Do the two of you have some beef with each other?
I've recently garnered some inspiration for a new nation concept. If I don't suddenly vanish again, I'm going to post a WIP within the next day or two.
Additionally, if you seriously think that modern firearms are somehow incapable of contending with the body armor in this RP, then you might want to revisit contemporary firearm technology (specifically the plethora of cartridge phenotypes that a firearm can be chambered for). For example, your standard FMJ round is not going to have the same penetration values of an APDS cartridge or a round with a tungsten (or depleted uranium) head. If stopping power and penetration are both still an issue, move on to the next little-known stage of firearm engineering: gyrojets, electrothermal-chemical technology and improved propellants (such as bulk-loaded liquid propellants or nano-engineered solid propellants).Well, while I agree with sufficient thought behind the chemically powered firearms can be just as powerful as various railguns and sci-fi energy weapons, saying that a modern .50cal would have much use is naive.
There's more to infantry weapons than just lasers, railguns, and plasma weapons. To be honest, a modern high-powered anti-material rifle that's chambered for the Russian 14.5×114mm HMG round is capable of destroying light-armored vehicles with relative impunity. Give one to a soldier that's wearing a bog-standard powered exoskeleton, shove a smart sight on it and boon the Russian HMG round with the capacity to correct itself mid-flight (yes, self-guiding bullets do exist: http://www.iflscience.com/technology/darpa-has-created-self-guided-mid-flight-changing-bullets) and you now have a soldier that has nullified the anti-material rifle's greatest weakness: lack of mobility due to the weapon's innate mass.
EDIT: Of course, the above ignores logistics, the nature of urban combat and the training needed to operate such a hefty rifle, but meh.Don't worry, not many people think about that for a space opera, science fantasy RP.
EDIT 2: Although the RP has a single nation that utilizes particle accelerator weapons that can fling antiparticles at FTL velocities. Which can somehow only be guarded against by employing energy shields or [nanogibberish] armor forged from [nanogibberish] wonder materials.Yup, that's me.
>PowerscalingHe's surprisingly pedantic about the history/tech of my minor faction, actually.
>Duck actually reading apps
Pick one.
United Terran Federation and no, they're in this universe, just a different galaxy.I see.
Many armors in this RP also include the classic "immune to firearms" sentence thus directly rendering modern infantry weapons useless.
My beams being antimatter only give them a slight boost in comparison. X amount of antimatter can only interact with X amount of matter.
<Snipped quote>That's just space opera, soft Sci-Fi for you.
This only opens up the possibility of someone drifting into the roleplay and proclaiming that their fictional suits of armor are incapable of sustaining damage from traditional science fiction weaponry. Throwing around the "I" word is a rather dangerous slippery slope to start down.
At the end of the day, your standard M4 carbine is identical to a longbow, a crossbow, a flintlock rifle, or a near-future railgun in principle (but not in mechanical function). While the rules for a DEW may be different, a handheld railgun is going to be constrained by Sir Issac Newton's tyranny, making the few merits that it retains somewhat moot and irrelevant if the creature firing it is incapable of withstanding the recoil that such an infantry arm will generate upon being fired. If people are going to hand-wave the issue of recoil away with a railgun, the same can be done for the firearm.Recoil is generally ignored in Sci-Fi, not so shockingly.
At any rate, I'm not using modern firearms for my faction, but it irks me when I see people writing off customary firearms as inherently useless in space opera settings.They aren't always but even then they generally show feats which would make modern firearms look like peashooters.
The antimatter itself, at least from my perspective, isn't the problem, but the concept of an FTL positron beam strikes me as being over-the-top even for a space opera setting. Your standard graser, x-ray laser, or neutral particle accelerator is overpowered enough, but throwing matter at warp factor [insert random numerical value here] is a tad ludicrous.Excuse me?
As stated by Zoldcyk, there is a policy against arguing in the OOC. I'm stepping and telling everyone to either drop it or take it to PMs.