@MelonHead That's one hell of a straw man you got there, so we'll address this with the same candor that you gave me to me.
First of all, you in fact, factually, misunderstood several facets of my unconvincing argument, that may have been more convincing had you devoted a half a second of actual critical thought to it. When you very clearly stated that 'attacking or moving would count as an interrupt', which isn't in any damn way how that works, but feel free to attack strawmans and retort with half-assed vitriolic, defensive shit your ilk love to do.
This is is generally the exact attitude in met with whenever I challenge the notion that, GOD FOR-FUCKING-BID someone does something in a way you don't agree with.
onto your trivial understanding of how time works, since you clearly don't understand... Again. Moving not in accordance with an enemies plan, again doesn't count as ab interrupt, which I describe as the 'retroactive prevention of someone's action'. Doing something else does not break time. I did not stop your attack from occurring. Replying to an attack without stopping it is not interrupting because the timeline is still juxtoposed or moving forward. No actual time breaking is done, which is what your breed of fighting does.
And I mean yeah, my super unconcvincing arguments that used multiple examples and various simple ways to get across the concept may not be good, but your argument is.... Well shit, you don't have one. You haven't actually attacked anything I've said, just (probably) intentional misconceptions about how my system works.
9/10 I have fought use interrupts to fish for easy wins without actually ever dealing with something, but instead removing it from existence in its entirety, or to avoid an attack they can't, or don't want to deal with.
You can get defensive and called my system flawed, because it is. I never said it wasn't. I actually said it was earlier, but the thing is, so is yours, my boy. Interrupts are a far cry from the best or only system in this internet verse.
But I mean, to each his own, right? To clarify on my sudden aggression, it is in response to your unwarranted disrespect toward I and my opinion, because of what I perceive to be insecurities and defensiveness because I said 'you don't understand', when, contrary to what you believe, you actually, factually, truthfully, did not understand several facets about it, and still dont, considering you continue to build straw men based on your aforementioned wrong preconceived notions of what 'no interrupts.' it wasn't rude, or inflammatory, nor 'bame dropping'. It was honesty, and I was attempting to help you understand.
Have a good day folks. I think this is as good a place as any to take my leave. I honestly don't have time to argue with some insecure elitist over a system that will never effect him because he will never fight me. Like I said, this happens quite a lot lol.
First of all, you in fact, factually, misunderstood several facets of my unconvincing argument, that may have been more convincing had you devoted a half a second of actual critical thought to it. When you very clearly stated that 'attacking or moving would count as an interrupt', which isn't in any damn way how that works, but feel free to attack strawmans and retort with half-assed vitriolic, defensive shit your ilk love to do.
This is is generally the exact attitude in met with whenever I challenge the notion that, GOD FOR-FUCKING-BID someone does something in a way you don't agree with.
onto your trivial understanding of how time works, since you clearly don't understand... Again. Moving not in accordance with an enemies plan, again doesn't count as ab interrupt, which I describe as the 'retroactive prevention of someone's action'. Doing something else does not break time. I did not stop your attack from occurring. Replying to an attack without stopping it is not interrupting because the timeline is still juxtoposed or moving forward. No actual time breaking is done, which is what your breed of fighting does.
And I mean yeah, my super unconcvincing arguments that used multiple examples and various simple ways to get across the concept may not be good, but your argument is.... Well shit, you don't have one. You haven't actually attacked anything I've said, just (probably) intentional misconceptions about how my system works.
9/10 I have fought use interrupts to fish for easy wins without actually ever dealing with something, but instead removing it from existence in its entirety, or to avoid an attack they can't, or don't want to deal with.
You can get defensive and called my system flawed, because it is. I never said it wasn't. I actually said it was earlier, but the thing is, so is yours, my boy. Interrupts are a far cry from the best or only system in this internet verse.
But I mean, to each his own, right? To clarify on my sudden aggression, it is in response to your unwarranted disrespect toward I and my opinion, because of what I perceive to be insecurities and defensiveness because I said 'you don't understand', when, contrary to what you believe, you actually, factually, truthfully, did not understand several facets about it, and still dont, considering you continue to build straw men based on your aforementioned wrong preconceived notions of what 'no interrupts.' it wasn't rude, or inflammatory, nor 'bame dropping'. It was honesty, and I was attempting to help you understand.
Have a good day folks. I think this is as good a place as any to take my leave. I honestly don't have time to argue with some insecure elitist over a system that will never effect him because he will never fight me. Like I said, this happens quite a lot lol.
