[OOC] Splendor and Stupidity (A KonoSuba-inspired RP)- We're Live, Guys!

[FujiwaraPhoenix]

@VarionusNW: Er... Well, there's nothing wrong with the character, but the backstory makes her feel a bit too... I dunno, serious for this RP's mood?

[VarionusNW]

@VarionusNW: Er... Well, there's nothing wrong with the character, but the backstory makes her feel a bit too... I dunno, serious for this RP's mood?

@PKMNB0Y

Yea, I had a feeling that you would have issues with that. I typically create characters with intent for character development, and try to have a reason for every part of a character's personality. I could tell that for this RP, the norm was characters that were inherently absurd, created as silly characters with funny traits. The thing is, I don't really express my more comedic characters in that way, since my style of comedy is less inherent absurdity, and more subtlety and character interaction.

TL;DR: While the character seems serious, I believe that the comedic aspects of the character will be more prevalent within the IC.

[Vee]

*Cheers in the distance to let VarionusNW's character to be accepted.*

[VarionusNW]

#FreeSmith @Vee @PKMNB0Y

[Lucius Cypher]

*Also cheers for Vari's character to be accepted.*

[Jedly]

@VarionusNW@Vee@Lucius Cypher
#ForTheSuccubus

[Grey]

I have an idea for this.

Do you still have room for facetanks?

[FujiwaraPhoenix]

Hm... Alright, I think that everyone else seems to be in favor of it, so why not? =w=;;;;;;;;;

@Grey: I actually think that's the only archetype that we're missing rn lol.

[Rin]

Aw... Guess I'm going to have to sit this out then. :(

[FujiwaraPhoenix]

Well, who said we were only gonna have one party? =3=

Also, who ever said two tanks was a bad thing?

[VitaVitaAR]

We've got a few different types of characters still open though. ^^;

We don't have any offensive magic-users unless you count a summoner for one.

[VarionusNW]

We've got a few different types of characters still open though. ^^;

We don't have any offensive magic-users unless you count a summoner for one.

@VitaVitaAR

Umm... excuse me. I'm pretty sure a spellsword counts as on offensive magic user. So, we technically have 2 offensive magic users.

[VitaVitaAR]

I wasn't quite thinking that, though.

I was thinking more the full-focused mage type. Which we don't have an offensive-focused mage. ^^;

[Grey]

@Rin If you've already got a lot of your sheet done, I'd be fine with rolling a blaster mage instead since I haven't really touched the CS yet and I also have an idea for one of those.

[Rin]

@GreyI... Actually don't have anything done yet. ^^; Was pretty sick for the past few days and couldn't focus on doing much until today.

...If I went with a full caster they'd probably end up either as a walking nuke or a charlatan who actually knows barely any magic and just fakes their way through things with a bunch of low level utility spells anyways. XD

[Lucius Cypher]

@Rin If you've already got a lot of your sheet done, I'd be fine with rolling a blaster mage instead since I haven't really touched the CS yet and I also have an idea for one of those.

@Grey

Grey we fucking talked about this. I did not spend five hours at work on my phone trying to find you Shota pics just for you to throw it all away to be a fucking blaster caster.

[Grey]

You're not my real dad.

[VarionusNW]

I checked the existing character types, and found that what we have so far is: 2 archers/rangers, 1 bard, 1 summoner, 1 support/priest, 1 merchant, 2 warriors, 1 rogue, and 1 spellsword

7 offensive characters, 2 support characters, and 1 utility character.

In conclusion: We need more meatshields

[Rin]

...I can do meatshields if it comes down to it I guess. >.> <.<

[Lucius Cypher]

You're not my real dad.

@Grey

Son, I'm only going to say this once. We do this the easy way or the hard way. It's your choice. In the Booty Warrior.