@Ezekiel How should my character intro into the plot at this time in your opinion?
- Last Seen: 11 mos ago
- Joined: 11 yrs ago
- Posts: 6808 (1.73 / day)
- VMs: 17
-
Username history
- Dolerman 5 yrs ago
- ██████████████ 11 yrs ago
-
Latest 10 profile visitors:
-
Most recent →
PrinceAlexus,
Bluetommy,
katelvno,
Kaithe Dame,
Rickrigas,
Dion,
Ninthhouse99,
Sabotage,
Blubaron45,
Daxam
Status
Recent Statuses
4 yrs ago
Current
Steampunk or Cyberpunk decisions, decisions.
5 yrs ago
I've written and published two books before my 30th birthday, I'm happy but I should have started sooner.
3
likes
5 yrs ago
I stopped RPing for nearly a year because I've been self publishing novels, but maybe I should jump back in again.
11
likes
6 yrs ago
Stan Lee was able to create superheroes on the pages for us as kids, so we could find the superheroes in ourselves as adults.
7
likes
6 yrs ago
A local hairdresser was arrested for prostitution last night. I'm shocked. I was a customer of hers for years, and I didn't even know she was a hairdresser.
7
likes
Most Recent Posts
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
I don't.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
You act like Brendan Fraser and Nathan Fillion were the innovators of a concept that predates the both of them.
<Snipped quote>
If you think Chris Pratt's entire filmography is Jurassic World and Guardians of the Galaxy instead of a career where he's more often than not played the co-star supporting friend role such as in Her or The Five Year Engagement or Delivery Man, not counting his more dramatic turns in supporting positions in Moneyball and Zero Dark Thirty.
No, my entire point is that brendan frasier and nathan fillion are just examples of a very overused and long standing character trope that was around way before and will be around way after chris pratt.
Ive not seen moneyball but Zero Dark Thrity? It was a dramamtic film sure, but Chris Pratt was in it for about 17 mins and he cracked 2 jokes and held a gun in a brief shooting scene. Hardly a 'dramatic turn'.
Im not even saying he's a crap actor, I'm saying he's nothing new, interesting or special.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
I've seen dumber.
If you watch YMS I dont doubt that.
secondly stop talking like youre better than people you arent.
thirdly, chris pratt still owns.
By responding to your accusation of a dumb take with my own accusation with a dumb take?
Dont dish what you cant eat.
Chris Pratt plays a bigger screen version of what Brendan Frasier was doing with the Mummy. With elements of what Nathan Fillion was doing with Firefly/Serenity.
'Kinda cocky, kinda cool, kinda funny but wholesome badass' is not a particularly interesting archetype regardless of how many times you say 'owns'.
What about co-starring?
Depends how much screen time he has, but I'd generally avoid.
Sorry to Bother You is the only movie worth seeing this decade.
The commie praising the commie propaganda movie?
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
chris pratt owns thats a dumb take
Oh look another Prawn/Raddum clone.
Saying that any actor 'owns' is a pretty dumb take, especially a heavily type-casted, cookie cutter comedy action hero guy.
There were many before him and there will be many to follow.
I'm a simple man, if I see a movie starring Chris Pratt, I avoid.
Actually, Magnificent Seven was fairly inoffensive.
Actually, Magnificent Seven was fairly inoffensive.
@Delta44 Awesome It'll be a teacher x student story, your character will be a moderately skilled duelist looking to improve. You still remember the game right?
Okay I'm gonna finally get posting.
© 2007-2024