Avatar of Jotunn Draugr
  • Last Seen: 7 yrs ago
  • Joined: 9 yrs ago
  • Posts: 767 (0.23 / day)
  • VMs: 3
  • Username history
    1. Jotunn Draugr 9 yrs ago
  • Latest 10 profile visitors:

Status

Recent Statuses

8 yrs ago
Current I'm so horny, the crack of dawn better be careful around me.
1 like
8 yrs ago
Kinkshaming other kinks is my kink, so don't kinkshame my kinkshaming kink.
1 like
8 yrs ago
Grab life by the p***y
2 likes
8 yrs ago
Fitness? More like Fit'n'ess whole pizza in my mouth!
5 likes
8 yrs ago
ALRIGHT! THAT'S IT! WHICH ONE OF YOU MOTHERFUCKERS STOLE MY FUCKING... OH! There it is...
4 likes

Bio

Canadian English Teacher
Deep fascination with anything relating to medieval Europe, or ancient Greece

Most Recent Posts

Xi Xiu


Stricken by the haste of the whole situation, Xiu retreated to her bunk posthaste. Seeing the rest of her new neighbours doing the same, she resigned to a swiftly ended night. She was certain that she'd have plenty opportunities to learn more about the newcomers. For now, she encased herself back into her blanket cocoon, and drifted off, into to troubled sleep.
<Snipped quote by Jotunn Draugr>

Why are you not biting, cmon I was looking forward to this from you the most...

This is a free speech zone, no one is going to call you a racist, and even if they did, I'm pretty sure most of us wouldnt care as that gets thrown around too much anyway.

<Snipped quote by j8cob>
Is your opinion close to something like this? ^^^^


It's been over a week. I wouldn't mind.

Do you think a role-call might be good idea?
@Dynamo Frokane
This is a neat idea, although I don't generally like pigeon-holing like this. I'd rather people were asked to label themselves, rather than choose from a small list. That said, I'll try.

Are You A........

Men's Rights Activist (MRA) (I acknowledge their legitimacy)
There are major issues that disproportionately affect men, that aren't taken seriously by society at large. That said, I don't necessarily agree with their end goal of egalitarianism. I'm not sure that men and women being equal, as they see it, would be the best situation for humanity.

Anaracho Capitalist (No)
Depends who you're trying to help. Personally, I don't own a large, multinational business, so anarcho-capitalism doesn't help me. Likewise, I don't believe it helps the majority of humanity. Some basic regulation is required, to prevent exploitation and dishonesty. An informed, respected consumer leads to a healthier, stronger, more stable society.

SJW (Social Justice Warrior) (depends)
Not as it's defined on the internet. I do believe there to be many social justice causes that need attention (that aren't given that attention right now), but the overwhelming majority of "social justice warriors", are privileged white bitches looking to further their own status and luxury, rather than fight for those who actually need help.

Feminist (depends)
I exist in some sort of grey area, where some people call me a feminist, and others call me a sexist/misogynist/anti-feminist. Basically, I think equality of opportunity is a good thing, and women should be given the chance to excel, if they are able to do so.

Brexiter (yes)

I believe in democracy, and the EU's system of governance acts against the right of citizens of sovereign nations to vote for their leaders and policies. Brexit was the result of the democratic process, where the common citizens had the opportunity to make their voice heard. They made their decision, and we should absolutely, and resolutely, honour that decision.

Gamergater/Pro Gamergate (I acknowledge their legitimacy)
Gamergate raised genuine issues. While I couldn't be bothered to take up the cause myself (I have bigger fish to fry), I believe their end result was constructive to society.

Race Realist (Pleading the fifth)

Sorry, your honour, I'm not biting.

Libertarian (Half)

Socially, I suppose you could call me a libertarian. I believe people should have the right to do what they want to do to themselves, and by themselves, without being subjugated by government thugs. Economically, not at all. I believe trade needs to be controlled, if we wish to preserve the standard of living of the middle class.

How's that? Any questions?
Hi hi! I have a paper to write right now, but I will have a post up within two hours. :)

Aight. I'm gonna be honest. I have bad writers block rn...


Hey man, when in doubt, bullshit it. Bullshit is the glue that holds society together.
Yep, I think we're at the point of simply asking "who's willing to GM this thing?"

If you're willing, you have my blessing.
A FIGHT? COUNT ME IN!

<Snipped quote by Jotunn Draugr>

Ireland ... benefitted ... no. Just no.


Not Ireland. The Irish. As in, immigrants from Ireland, TO the Anglo world.
<Snipped quote>

Yeh, for the most part people are identifying their own fixes to the same problems. Shit on the ground for working class Americans right now is tough, myself saying this from the trenches of that same world.

Largely I think immigration reform is a big red herring. First, because it is a recurrent problem for us (fun-fact: Prohibition started out with an anti-immigrant aspect, since the immigrants at that time were the Irish and Germans) Second, the right's plan is mostly an impractical populism. We'd have to go full on Iron curtain to pull it off, and I cannot imagine that being worth it. We've never had a homogeneous society; this immigration issue is one of our oldest, predating the Civil War. We won't get rid of it without losing ourselves in the process. Saying we'll force the immigrants to integrate is like saying we'll force the drug dealers to stop dealing. To do either you'll need a full fledged police-state to pull it off. The United States as it operates now, within the delicate borders of public opinion and constitutional law (in theory), is somewhat limited in how they can prosecute a war on Hispanics. Do we... go door to door checking papers like the Gestapo? Road blocks in East LA? Police profiling? We can build a wall, and then what? That'll up the premium for Coyotes to do their work, all the while we spend shit loads of cash on a massive back-drop for folk singers to use in politically conscious music videos.

There is no such thing as a simple fix. Immigration is with the US, like or not, so long as we remain a legalistic society. All we can do is work within reason to stem the flow, and focus our attention to integration not so much by force (heh, put a gun to a kids head and force him to watch Oprah or whatever), but by doing our best to increase the resources available to bring people who want out of the ghettos out of the ghettos. The weird half-system we have now, where we paint abuellas with the same brush we do drug-peddlers, is only increasing the tension and pushing out the divide. You either suspend the constitution or you work with people, but trying to run a self-hating police state is impractical.


I think you misunderstood me. I'm not saying fucking Nazi Germany. You say you want to "stem the flow" of immigrants. That's all I'm saying. I never said anything about stopping it completely. And as for integration, I'm just talking about mandatory language/culture classes, and maybe restrictions on how much non-American/non-English media is allowed to be produced by one body of people. There wouldn't need to be any roadblocks, door-to-door knocking, or any other Left-wing paranoid fever-dreams, because the government already has a record of information on everyone who legally immigrates to the country. No need to search, they're right there.

This just sounds like the same old left-wing propaganda machine, screaming "police state" and "racist", every time someone suggests even the mildest vetting process for immigration/naturalized-citizenship applications.

But I don't really have to say it is impractical, because being empty populism, nobody will go very far with it. This specific round of know-nothingism has been around for at least as long as I have, though it could very well be longer (I guess when the Unions stopped blaming the Japanese for taking our jobs? I don't know, I always remember the Mexican immigration problem being bandied about. I can remember as a kid my grandma saying how she really wants to go to the border and help shoot Mexicans. Going back the the entire "The left is worried about a pogrom" thing, well, that concern didn't pop up out of thin air.) Republicans have been in a position to deal with it in the past and they haven't, and I suspect it's the same reason Dems won't do anything about it, and why Trumps answer is so shallow. It isn't something they can answer because the laws are already in place (hence it being illegal immigration), but the problem isn't some easy fix.


Yes, both parties have been in a position to crack down on it, and haven't, because their wealthy campaign contributors demand the cheap exploitable labour. Saying that something is illegal, and therefor we're already doing as much as we can, is just inaccurate. Smoking pot and jaywalking are both illegal in Canada, but neither are enforced. No one goes to jail for either. Meanwhile, illegal immigrants, who sneak into the country over and over again, and even are caught stealing and trespassing, are just caught and released like fish. If you actually build a blockade solid enough that Mexicans can't get across it so easily, and then establish a REAL punishment for illegal entry, you'll start to see this problem go away.

It's not a difficult thing to fix.

Also, for the record, I think illegal immigration is important for the culinary health of the nation. Best Mexican joints are the ones where only one employee kinda speaks english, and serves as the liaison for the rest of the employees.


Hahaha. Oh gawd, I seriously hope your joking. "The culinary health of the nation". Are you actually employed by Hillary Clinton?

<Snipped quote>

Ooooh. I thought you were arguing that Russia and Turkey were anglicized, as in the countries had slipped into Englishness.


Nah, this is about immigrants. The anglicisation of the world is a very interesting conversation, but maybe for another day.

I think this is more of a numbers game. Not enough Russians and Turks coming into the country to coalesce into noticeable groups. There are places in the US where Russians hang out amongst themselves, in those little European enclaves that pop up in more vaguely defined areas that I think most people probably can locate if they live in a major enough city. I know a New Yorker with a very Italian mom who's mother complained their old neighborhood was overrun with Russians, for instance. But this is small. I suspect if Mexicans stayed more along the border, like you were only seeing Mexicans piling up in Texas and California, it wouldn't be as noticeable. Case in point, the Germans and Irish did the same thing back in the 19th century. They immigrated in large enough numbers to freak the neighbors out and you ended up with the "Know-Nothing" movement.


Case in point. Step one is reducing the numbers.

Mexicans, however, are a massive migratory group. They had been there before, and a lot of those places in the southwest have been Mexican-cultured since we took them from Mexico (at least those clinging to the border), which makes it easier for those Hispanic immigrants to jump the border without jumping the culture.


Which is why we need the wall.

Side note:
-Mexico recently announced plans for their own border wall, with Guatemala, to keep those filthy illegal south-american immigrants out. Hmmmm, starting to sound like maybe a wall is a good idea.

I have been to a Russian market by the way, or at least Eastern Bloc Market, because a big chunk of the stuff was in Cyrillic with English stickers stuck over the nutritional info. If they are in Missouri they are surely elsewhere. I found a Kinder Surprise there, which is interesting because they are one of those things famously illegal in the US for some reason, so I bough a bunch of them to give out to people.

As for Turks... you know, I don't think I've met a Turk. Or if I did, they didn't identify openly. Though from what I have seen of Turks online, meeting one that didn't identify openly would seem unlikely.


I've known a couple Turks. They were wonderful, western people, looking to make their mark on the Canadian business-world. Likewise, the Russians I've known were just normal Canadian rednecks, who occasionally spoke to each other in Russian.

And alright, that's interesting that there's an Eastern Bloc Market in Missouri, of all places (one day I'd love to go there, and see what I can find), but nonetheless the eastern bloc isn't contributing to a crime/drug epidemic, an explosion of completely non-English material, the formation of eastern bloc ghettos, and isn't openly aggressive to American citizens passing through. Did the people at the shops, for example, speak intelligible English, and were they welcoming enough that you were able to complete your purchases without trouble? If you had a conversation with one, did they seem knowledgeable of American pop-culture? Was the place tolerably sanitary? Did they have functioning bathrooms? Did anyone try to sell you hard drugs, or accost you for money?
@Jotunn Draugr

Since America is part of the English speaking world you really can't exclude parts of Africa since American culture is like 80% African culture. Gospel dirived from hymns slaves sang. We created blues, jazz, tap, hiphop, flat irons. (And a lot more that I can't remember at the moment)

Mexico reached far up into America so when it was stolen from them their culture seaped, once again, into an English speaking culture.

Native Americans had to teach early European immigrants how to farm the land in order to survive (your welcome land stealers)


1. Excuse me? Citation needed on that one... "we created"... OHHH!!! So are you one of those black imperialist/anti-cultural-appropriation types?... Jeez, where do I begin? I disagree with the initial premise, that "black culture" composes any more than 13% of American culture (equivalent to the portion that happens to be black), but even granting that, people in the Congo aren't listening to Fats Waller, Billy Holiday, and Louis Prima! Wherever its inspirations came from, jazz is not African. It's Western.

2. Culture isn't some substance that soaks into the ground. If you purge an area of people and buildings, you purge it of culture. The culture came back due to lax immigration policies, not some magical notion of culture-juice, seeping through the cracks.

3. Okay, so what? How does attitude this help us improve today?
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet