NarcolepticSailor

World in Revolution: 1861

Peace of Venice
Signed at Venice, April 21, 1865



Article I: The Austrian Empire acknowledges as legitimate both Dutch rule over the land of Belgium (pending negotiations regarding the status of Wallonia) and Prussian rule over Elsass-Lothringen.

Article II: The Austrian Empire will cede land in accordance with the map provided in this treaty, the transfer of which will be immediate upon the signing of this treaty by each nation involved in said transfers.

Article III: The Austrian Empire will renounce its claims to all land ceded to the Kingdom of Italy, and the Kingdom of Prussia in perpetuity.

Article IV: The Austrian Empire will cede all of their votes and position as President within the German Confederation to the Kingdom of Prussia.

Article V: All hostilities between the members of the Eighth Coalition and the Austrian Empire shall come to an end upon signing of this treaty.

Article VI: All signatory nations hereby signing a non-aggression pact with the Austrian Empire lasting a period no longer than five years time. Upon the end of each non-aggression pact, each respective nation may be free to either renew the non-aggression pact or not.

Article VII: Relations between the signatory nations and the Austrian Empire shall return to normal once more, allowing trade and commerce to resume.

[X]His Majesty King Vittorio Emanuel III
[X]His Majesty King Wilhelm I
[X]His Majesty Emperor Franz Joseph I
[X]His Majesty King Willem III
[X]His Majesty Tsar Alexander II
[X]Her Majesty Queen Isabella II

World in Revolution: 1861

So Boerd said
^

I don't think anyone is getting diplo-annexed.

Edit: Or maybe they are.

World in Revolution: 1861

bigscreech said
Hmm my hands were tied, when you have European dogs at your gates I'm sure your tune will change. Not all of us can achieve a bloodless independence but then again you'd couldn't understand as you haven't been dealing with conflicts since your nations founding.

Man, just get on good terms with the United States. If the British decide to come for you I doubt they'd want to go through the United States as well to do so. Monroe Doctrine.

World in Revolution: 1861

Ampharos said
I'm not exactly sure how the Conference of Constantinople came about. I wasn't even going to attend it until I found out the other Great Powers were.

Yeah, I didn't mean to sound like I was making a personal shot at anyone. I generally like to think I maintain some sense of civility and haven't come over hostile towards anyone, but that Treaty that was formed there seemed detrimental to developing the NRP to me. I'm hoping that another war involving as many people as this one doesn't break out anytime soon after.

World in Revolution: 1861

Once the ACW is settled and if Aegon loses is he even allowed to just switch to another nation or does he get sent back in the queue?

Ampharos said
Okay, I think we're pretty civil, but I don't appreciate this accusation. What does this mean?

There was a collective alliance throughout the entirety of Europe and a council that basically wouldn't allow any war in Europe at all and if one started, they'd get dog-piled be all GPs. I didn't think it'd need much of an explanation as to how this could prove detrimental to the development of the NRP, it'd make everything way too quiet at a time period where such a thing shouldn't even be possible. There should be conflict in Europe that doesn't automatically draw everyone into the pile, there should be isolated wars between a few powers, but not all of them.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pepperm1nts said
The Coalition wins, it's the Allies who are getting nothing out of this (except a lot of dead sons and fathers). The Prussians are a step closer to forming the German Empire, and the Dutch can now form Greater Netherlands. All the allies get is a bunch of dead people. Seriously, you should have kept fighting, France. Your move didn't just cost everyone the war, but will put you all at a severe disadvantage for (probably) the remainder of the RP. The Coalition has practically won the game.

There isn't a game to win, there also isn't really a whole lot we actually want in a peace deal with the allies in the first place. It also doesn't mean that the current alliance that the Coalition formed will even last much longer after the war. None of us have any interest in trying to form a giant alliance to dictate control of Europe. The main reason I fought this war besides returning Italian land to my control was to stop the giant British, French, Austrian, Ottoman alliance. From the start of the game that alliance was basically stalling the progress of this NRP.

World in Revolution: 1861

Pepperm1nts said
Just seems a little weak to let them have Belgium and Alsace-Lorraine. Trying for peace is fine, it's agreeing to their demands so easily that seems a little off. You'd think France would feel a little stronger about letting both Belgium and Alsace-Lorraine go.

They'd given away AL before the war even started.

Edit: It was Austrian land when the war started.

World in Revolution: 1861

So Boerd said
Treachery cuts both ways. Don't worry Greece, we want you back.

Although there are a couple thousand dead Italians that they have to answer for. :l

World in Revolution: 1861

Regno d'Italia

A major step forward in returning Europe to a state of peace once more has been made today with the signing of this treaty of peace and friendship. The Kingdom and people of Italy have always held the French in high regard due to the bonds that have tied us together in friendship in the past. It both moves and warms my heart that the French Empire has decided peace between themselves and the Coalition is the best course of action for the future of Europe. At the conclusion of this horrible war which has engulfed our fair Europe, I look forward to strengthening the bond that already exists between our two glorious nations.

- King Vittorio Emanuele Maria Alberto Eugenio Ferdinando Tommaso of Italy

[X] Vittorio Emanuele Maria Alberto Eugenio Ferdinando Tommaso

World in Revolution: 1861

Pepperm1nts said
Honestly, Russia can take its sweet time getting soldiers there. Siberia will defend itself. Having troops there only accelerates the deaths of those on the offense.

Basically this.

Russia has been in far worse situations and this is not that bad in comparison.