SleepingSilence

What Are You Listening To?

I've been listening to a bunch of dumb poppy bullshit.

Toontown | The Guild's #1 Stop for Cartoon Discussion

With the exception of Bluelock. (A so far non-typical sport anime.) I've dropped nearly every show I've started this season.

So I've been looking for more things to watch...

Thus, here's a few of many animated shorts I looked at yesterday.

Post a random fact about yourself.

I'm learning how exhausting my folk's new puppy is. (Not that the cold weather is doing me any favors in terms of staying outside, and letting the puppy burn off some of its limitless energy.)

Since aside sleep. I don't think I've been sitting or immobile for more than thirty minutes at a time. Three (of the likely) nine days in a row. Because its a small dog and thus bites anything and everything it can. So even when I'm actively playing with her, or putting her in my lap and giving her my full attention. It leads to my clothes getting brand new holes in 'em. Assuming its not my hands.

So, I can only imagine how well my less-saintly patient and older parents are dealing with her.

What Are You Listening To?

I doubt the rest of the album has this much build up. But its pretty decent.

What shows/movies are you watching?

@Fabricant451 I feel like between this and Rings Of Power. Hollywood's just seeing what they can get away with, and still get praised for it.

But like what you like.

I'm sure that kind of audience will really like that new 'adult' Scooby Doo show, without the main character in it too. Because was Scooby Doo ever really that good anyway?

But then you have to wonder why these expensive shows based on nostalgic properties are always liked by people who already dislike or constantly slag off those nostalgic properties...

I'd say there's no way to prove motive. But in comics, for instance. Those books always seem to have nobody actually purchasing or putting money where their mouth is, for these "subversive" products. That, or it gets canned prematurely and has little fanfare trying to bring it back.

So I wonder how many bought Lord of the Rings or the older Marvel movies. Versus how many would actively pay for DVD's of these new shows...

In short: How good can something really be, if it isn't something most fans would individually pay for? (Let alone merchandise for it.)

What shows/movies are you watching?

The fact that She-Hulk attempted to pull a "We purposely made a bad ending of the show guys. Ha ha ha." Makes it one of the saddest pieces of fiction that I've never watched in my life.

Because it easily had one of the bigger budgets of any "bad show" that you ever watched. (Rings Of Power aside.) 75 million for 3 episodes, to put it in perspective.

No one, and I repeat, no one goes out to produce a bad show. (Let alone a project that spends so much money, and spends so much time worried about their haters.)

And it reminds me of that "secret Sherlock episode" that never existed. Because the joke isn't on the people who criticized the show. (Much as some truly zealous fans might want to believe.) It only validates their perspective.

It tacitly mocks your fanbase and supporters for ever liking it in the first place. Something you know is terrible and you did absolutely nothing to fix.

---

Also, not to do any work for the devil. But...

Netflix released a season of "The Mole". (All episodes come out on the 21st. And more come out today.) But while I'm watching it, because it was one the better reality shows to come out. The current season has been incredibly predictable, and I swear it better not be as obvious as the editing makes it out to be.

Video Games: The General Discussion & Community Thread Number Two

To make this quick; I do not recommend Source Of Madness.

I don't hate this game. (Yet.) And I might even attempt to struggle through more of it tomorrow. But Source Of Madness' gameplay is incredibly passive, and it has a single useful loadout for every situation as I feared. Aka, double life steal. (And that becomes the biggest problem in its boss fights.)

Because all you do for every boss is chip away at the long health bar, and watch it act as brain dead as most of the other enemy AI. (Though at least there’s usually some extra visual spectacle for your troubles.)

Except for “Krampus” (ha ha meme.) A snow boss. In a small boring-looking arena. With +14000 health. Environmental hazards that make it impossible to pay attention to what’s on screen. Combined with attacks that basically cannot be tactically dodged. Doing 6 damage per shot, despite both of my weapons' higher stats. (And there was no way to do extra damage.) Got him down to 200 HP, before I got stun locked to death.

A fight that could not have been any more insufferable and boring to experience. And the idea of grinding for upgrades to “outlast” the borefest a 2nd or likely 3rd time, does not excite me.

Toontown | The Guild's #1 Stop for Cartoon Discussion

Point is, I really hope this upcoming season has better "good shows" than this.

@SleepingSilence

Narrator: There was not. But at least you get another season of Mob Psycho and Chainsaw Man...

---

So...

What's everybody else watching?

Video Games: The General Discussion & Community Thread Number Two

I guess you can say "Well, you have to pay a sub for WoW." But it still doesn't change the fact that people have been getting $50+ expansion packs for free. I just don't see Overwatch being F2P now as an issue when people clearly have no issue with Blizzard making their other games or rather expansion packs free all the time.

@Kuro

I feel like this is an apples and oranges comparison though, no? Because one is essentially giving old paid-for DLC content free to its players. A net positive for basically everyone. (That I'm sure still upsets nerds who don't like new and healthy player bases.) Versus making their paid game (an objectively worse) free-to-play model, with additional microtransactions and heaping helpings of new server issues and bugs.

Unless the argument is "Blizzard gives people plenty already. So this going F2P, in order to squeeze more money out of its players, should be considered a fair trade."

Stuff like this only tends to happen when you're an Evolve-level marketing disaster. (Thus, the company is desperate to recuperate costs.) But I can't imagine the Overwatch player base was low enough to justify this decision. (According to articles like this, it was between 5-7 million players.)

Which sounds healthy to me. But I guess, for now, the marketing still clearly panned out in its favor with 10 million active players for its "sequel". (With only a tenth of that being currently online.)

However, in terms of competing with other vastly overrated FPS's. (Valorant, Fortnite, Apex Legends, etc.) It's getting crushed in numbers. So it almost feels like its an attempt to join in the F2P gold rush too little, too late.

But I suppose I don't really have a dog in this fight...

---

Because I was playing Source Of Madness. A rogue-lite with random generation, and a lovecraftian art style.

And yeah, I suppose it's precisely what you'd imagine would happen. Killing enemies from off-screen, from unreachable ledges and small cracks like the coward you are. Because everything is an incomprehensible mass of tentacles, that will only kill you by getting yourself stuck within them. So it was a mostly passive experience through my first run, with me getting an item that leeched life when it hit a target. (Obviously better than most of the other things that I was rewarded with.)

Then the second area had nothing but poison swamps and poisonous self-destructing enemies. So, yeah. I'm sure that will be a blast to deal with.

Though I enjoyed the atmosphere and how fair its challenge and upgrades appeared to be. (Compared to a much harder Dead Cells.) But I am concerned with how quickly repetitive and one note that it might feel in the future...

But it was more fun than suffering through Destiny 2.

Video Games: The General Discussion & Community Thread Number Two

I mean, I guess, but no one complains about Blizzard-

@Kuro

Imma let you finish but-

Blizzard is one of those companies that actually gets heat when its deserved. Because it got popular over a few nostalgic IP's, meant for PC gamers (the ones least willing to deal with bullshit) and it's been constantly fucking them all up. (Let alone all the other reasons the company gets shit.)

So yeah, WOW has gotten flak for a variety of reasons. Though I don't know which you're referring too. But looking it up leads to articles pointing out that Blizzard went on to ban boosting organizations. So I'd imagine someone/somewhere complained.

That said you should still have everything you had on your account at the time.

@Kuro

I said that due to everyone on twitter/social media stating the opposite. But it's apparently some widespread bug. (And not intentional design.)

I've basically never bothered with most of Blizzard's games. Overwatch, very much included. I only got into Heroes Of The Storm. (R.I.P)

Edit: I forgot Diablo games existed cuz tired. Don't judge me.