<Snipped quote by Tuujaimaa>
I didn't specify any distance, it only suggests my character moved backwards as cover and then relocated, which can mean any movement. Your character had no vision of my own, and therefore had no right to be reacting to his movements in her attacks, though I notice she still conveniently launched her attack in the area you presumed I was moving to, rather than trying to fire at the spot I was in.
You made your assumption, turns out it was wrong, my character took a step back and then ran off at a diagnol, as was fully acceptable under the description of 'relocation'
Okay, here is the timeline as I am understanding it:
You fire at me in three quick bursts. With the speed of the shots, I imagine that the first bullets would hit before you fired your last set of them. At your last burst of shots, I react to this by throwing the Namida no Fuujin at a tree at a central location approximately ten feet behind the first line of trees. During this time, you crouch and begin moving backwards (the specifics of which are still a point of contention).
Based on how this is running, and given that you have a four second time to achieve maximum speed (as stated in your bio), I am arguing that you can't have moved the distance you're claiming to given the timeline established above.
The primary point of contention is your lack of specification of distance and apparent desire to vaguely define your movement and then fill in the gap as appropriate in a later post. In my experience of combat, failing to define something allows the next player to define it - and while I am not attempting to define how you moved, my understanding of it was that you were backpeddling (which my post and thus assumption of the timeline is based on) and that that is the definition that would stick in my past experience.