Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by thorgili
Raw

thorgili

Member Seen 7 yrs ago


The Russian people congratulate the swedes and the danes on their unification into a single Scandinavian commonwealth but must openly wonder if the good king Charles or the good king Fredrick broaden their sights and want the creation of a Baltic Commonwealth either through diplomatic intimidation or violent measures. I would also like to Offer to our neighbors the Romanians a offer which will benefit both our nations and our people and bring about a new age of trade and friendship among our countries forming a alliance between the Slavic peoples. As Tsar of the Russian Empire, King of Poland, and Grand Prince of Poland I proudly present to Domnitor Alexandru The Treaty of Odessa!

Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



The following telegram was given to the Austrian ambassador. A copy was also published in a prominent Berlin newspaper.

"In light of the treaty of Constantinople, Minister President von Bismarck requires of the Austrian ambassador a formal opinion, in writing with an official seal, as to three questions to clarify Austria's diplomatic position.

1. Should Prussia or other German state find itself in a war with a European state who is an ally of France or France, where the aggressor is France or cannot be determined due to a near simultaneous commencement of hostilities, will Austria comply with its obligations under section C of the treaty of Paris and relevant decisions by the Federal Diet and cooperate in the defense of the federal fortresses of the German Confederation?
2. Will Austria allow French movement through its lands or French ships to dock in its ports under any circumstances? If so, under what circumstances?
3. If the merchant fleet of Prussia or another German State should come under attack on the high seas by France or French privateers, will Austria use its fleet to engage the French? If not, under what circumstances would Austria send naval aid?"
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Ampharos
Raw

Ampharos

Member Seen 6 yrs ago



Kaiserthum Oesterreich
The Austrian Empire


The Austrian Empire assures the Kingdom of Prussia that it has the interests of the German Confederation and the German people in mind. It also ensures the German Confederation that the Austrian Emperor, also the President of the German Confederation, prioritizes the advancement of the German people.

However, the Austrian Empire decidedly ignores the questions posed by the Minister-President of the Kingdom of Prussia. This ambassador believes that these questions intend to antagonize the French Empire and her allies in a time where a careful peace is being maintained between the French and German peoples.

The Austrian Empire reminds the Kingdom of Prussia that the French Empire is a fellow signatory of the Treaty of Constantinople is a partner to the German Confederation in maintaining peace on the European continent. It also reminds the Kingdom of Prussia that the French Empire willing ceded Elsass-Lothringen to the German Confederation, and as a signatory of the Treaty of Constantinople, gave its support to the Kingdom of Prussia in claiming Holstein-Schleswig in the name of the German Confederation.

This ambassador sees no reason to dignify these questions with a response when the French Emperor has thus far given the German Confederation no reason to believe that France or her allies intend harm upon the German people.

Once again, the Austrian Empire reminds the Kingdom of Prussia that it is also a signatory of the Treaty of Constantinople and should be working to maintain peace on the European continent. More so, it reminds the Kingdom of Prussia that the Federal Diet and the Federal Fortresses of the German Confederation of for the German Confederation and its inhabitants and not an instrument for the advancement of any one member-state.

The Austrian Empire maintains the belief that the interests of the German Confederation may be advanced through peaceful means, but in the event of war, the Austrian Empire and its allies within the German Confederation will undoubtedly stand in defense of the German people.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



The following editorial authored by Bismarck was published by a prominent Prussian newspaper, in the same issue as the full declaration by Austria is printed.

"Where Austria equivocates, Prussia speaks with conviction. In the interest of safety for the German people, Prussia declares that an attack on any German state in Germany by France or any other power is an attack on Prussia and will be responded to with force.

1. Prussia will continue to maintain its garrisons in the fortresses of the German Confederation it is charged with administering.
2. Prussia will never allow French soldiers onto German soil for any reason, at any time.

Prussia also notes with extreme dissatisfaction that Austria cannot even commit to keeping commitments it has already made. With outright disgust, Prussia decries that Austria cannot even commit to defend a member of the Confederation when France is the aggressor, in defiance of both its obligations under the Treaty of Constantinople and as president of the German Confederation. Coupled with the fact that Austria will not deny French troops access to its lands, I can be sure my personal efforts to ensure greater security for all Germans have failed, due in no small part to a Judas in our midst who for fear of the French will not pledge to resist them under any circumstances.

It again begs the question, therefore, if Austria has not been so beaten, so cowed by the French, both during the time of Napoleon and recently in Italy, that it will not go along with any French demand.

It is therefore the intention of Prussia to move in the Federal Diet that, pending a positive affirmation by Austria that it will defend the fortresses, Austrian garrisons be evicted from all federal fortresses and replaced by Prussian, Bavarian, and Badenese soldiers."
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Ampharos
Raw

Ampharos

Member Seen 6 yrs ago



Kaiserthum Oesterreich
The Austrian Empire


To our brothers within the German Confederation, do not allow the Kingdom of Prussia to pull the wool over your eyes. When the Minister-President of the Kingdom of Prussia speaks of conviction, he really speaks of discrediting the Austrian Empire and expanding the Kingdom of Prussia’s clout within the German Confederation.

The Austrian Empire urges its allies to recognize the defense of the German Confederation as a collaborative effort between all member-states and that any single member-state taking the helm of its defenses means surrendering sovereignty to that state. If the Kingdom of Prussia petitions the Federal Diet that Austrian garrisons be evicted from Federal Fortresses, this Emperor urges the member-states of the German Confederation to vote a resounding nay.

The Minister-President of the Kingdom of Prussia attempts to twist our words and vilify us in an attempt to further its own interests within the German Confederation at the expense of the Austrian Empire.

The Austrian Empire stands by the Treaty of Constantinople and will do all it can to ensure that peace is maintained on the European continent.

The Austrian Empire once more recognizes the French Empire’s generosity in transferring Elsass-Lothringen to the German Confederation. In the interest of maintaining warm diplomatic relations with the outside world, the Austrian Empire outright refuses to condemn the French Empire as an enemy of the German Confederations or the French people as enemies of Germans. We recognize that that the French Empire has been more than cooperative with ensuring that ethnic Germans are brought into the fold of the Confederation.

The President-Minister speaks of commitment, but how can one truly commit to peace when he is publishing rhetoric denouncing both his brothers within the German Confederation and his allies abroad who so generously supported the liberation of Holstein-Schleswig from the Dane?

Once more, the Austrian Empire commits itself fully to the advancement of the German Confederation, all the while denouncing the foolishness of this posturing. Together with the other Great Powers of Europe, we have worked tirelessly to bring Elsass-Lothringen and Holstein-Schleswig into the fold of the German Confederation, and yet, the Kingdom of Prussia calls us traitors?

Remember, compatriots, the last two years were won through diplomacy, not war, and the Austrian Empire and the other Great Powers have proven that the pen is indeed mightier than the sword. Consider this when you cast your vote. Consider your sons and grandsons. Will they work together with their fellow man, both home and abroad, or will they redden the battlefields with their blood because some within the Confederation are more interested in making war than maintaining a peace which has thus far seen the peaceful restoration of German lands to the Confederation?

Because of the Treaty of Constantinople, and thanks to the combined efforts of the Great Powers, the French Empire included, German populations beyond the Confederation now reside happily within its borders. Once more, compatriots, remember that!

The Austrian Empire undoubtedly prioritizes the advancement of both the German Confederation and the German people, and we have the last two years to look back upon as evidence of that.

May we bring peace to Europe and prosperity to all.

- Franz Joseph I, Austrian Emperor
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Outcast
Raw
GM

Outcast

Member Offline since relaunch

A Scrap of Paper


In 1839, with the signing of the London Treaty, the United Kingdom of the Netherlands lost dominion over Belgium and agreed to recognise the independence of Belgium. However, less than 25 years later, words spoken behind closed doors included a plan to break the treaty and once again incorporate Belgium back ino the Kingdom of the Netherlands. In 1863, that plan went ahead. Seeking to cause a political crisis and hopefully shift the blame for causing the war, Dutch troops dressed in Belgian uniforms snuck over the border. When the ruse was discovered, shots were fired, and the main part of the Dutch army streamed over the border. The Belgian army reacted quickly to the news of the war.

The first battle took place near the city of Antwerp. The 29 000 strong Dutch force met 32 000 Belgians determined to stop the invaders. The Dutch threw assault after assault at the Belgian lines, only to be pushed back time and time again. As news of the invasion reverberated around the international community, the Dutch strike had already ground to a halt. It looked as if the Belgians would survive and perhaps win the coming battle, had it not been for the intervention of perhaps the most powerful nation on the continent. As the larger part of the Belgian army was busy fighting in Flanders, only 10 000 troops stood against the First Army, a Prussian force of 79 000. Heavily outnumbered, the Belgian troops occupied a hilltop in Liege and fired down at the Prussians. They had the best of the fighting at first, but fearing that the Prussians would encircle them, they retreated back to defend the capital. The Prussian commander Helmuth von Moltke did not follow up on his advantage, instead heading northwest to aid his Dutch allies. Arriving at Antwerp, the fatigued Belgians also gave way, falling back to defend Brussels.
(-2,700 regulars to the Netherlands, -4,000 regulars to Prussia, -3,200 regulars to Belgium)


Prussian infantry charging at the Belgian position


As the Prusso-Dutch force marched towards Brussels, the Belgians gathered to defend the capital. As the Dutch force moved from the north, the Prussians swung back round to strike from the east. In the west, a small Dutch force delivered by transport vessels moved through the countryside almost unopposed. King Leopold I of Belgium had gathered his entire force in Brussels. As the invaders entered the city, the Belgians fought back fiercely. At first the determined defenders had the best of it, but the superior numbers of the invaders forced the Belgians to slowly draw further into the city. Finally, understanding that the war was lost, the King bravely commended his soldiers for their brave actions, before ordering them to wait three hours more before surrendering. Using this time, he made plans to attempt to escape the country before he could be captured. The battered Belgian forces ceased firing and surrendered to the invaders.
(-3,300 regulars to the Netherlands, -5,000 regulars to Prussia, Belgium surrenders unconditionally)

As the war ended, a number of things occurred. In Flanders, there was some discontent at having taken the worst of the fighting, and many were unhappy that they had lost the war. However, they were mostly native Dutch, and made few protests as Dutch troops passed through. Indeed, as the Dutch troops put up flags of Flanders, many began to support them. In Wallonia, however, the people seethed against the invaders. Many fled to France, and there were near riots against the invaders. King Leopold I, supported by the people, found it easy to slip through enemy lines and he escaped to France, where he made his way to Paris, hoping to find French support. The Belgian navy, which was not an unimpressive force, also escaped the clutches of the enemy and made their way to French ports, where their captains formally handed them over to the French navy. In the wider international community, there was some sympathy for the Dutch position. For the Prussians, however, there was nothing but fear and distaste. The Prussian army had now invaded two nations in as many years, both of which were much smaller and weaker than Prussia. In the smaller nations of Europe, people were now terrified that the same fate could befall them. Many looked to the French, waiting to see what their response to the invasion would be.
(-2 ships-of-the-line, -3 screw frigates, -6 sail frigates, -3 transport ships to Belgium, +2 ships-of-the-line, +3 screw frigates, +6 sail frigates, +3 transport ships to France, -5 prestige to the Netherlands, -35 prestige to Prussia)
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by emmy1320
Raw

emmy1320

Member Offline since relaunch


Principatele Unite


I would like to humbly accept the Russians offer of a defensive treaty.

Article I.
Upon signing this treaty the signers nations shall enter into a defensive alliance
Article II.
This document shall also set out to increase and improve trade between our nation's and their people.
Article III.
Upon signing this document the signatories ratify this document.

[X] Tsar Alexander II, Autocrat of the Russias, King of Poland, Grand Prince of Finland, And the Great Liberator Tsar
[X] Domnitor Alexandru Ioan Cuza
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



"I sat in the very halls of the meeting house in Constantinople. I heard the words of the Austrian minister president:

'We recommend to the delegation that Elsass-Lothringen transfer directly to the Austrian Empire. We believe that in the effort of maintaining peace between the Second French Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia, Elsass-Lothringen should be administered by the Austrian Empire, a neutral third party.'

It was this remark which compelled my questioning. Austria declared itself neutral and not aligned with its German brothers. I would like nothing more than peace, to buy butter rather than guns, but how could I secure it without knowing my Germany, that nation I love as my father, would be safe? I was caught absolutely off-guard by the weak Austrian response. The answers to all my questions were fairly obvious. Stand with Germany, of course! Imagine my surprise when Austria turned its back on us!

The Roman philosopher Cicero remarked that no just state ever conducts a war except in defense of its people or honor. If another Bonaparte is born in France, Will the Austrians send sons to fight with yours, or another daughter to appease the French? Marie-Antoinette, Marie-Louise, it is quite the Austrian pattern.

If Austria believes I heard incorrectly, that the minister-president did not declare Austria "a neutral third party", have them prove me now herewith. Declare, Austria, as Germans, that Austria is not a neutral party, and the proving it by answering the questions which I posed or admit deserting your German brothers.

This becomes particularly important in light of the righteous cause of freeing our Germanic brothers in Belgium from the oppressive yoke of a Francophone regime. Will Austria stand with Germans, or the French?"
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by The Nexerus
Raw
Avatar of The Nexerus

The Nexerus Sui generis

Member Seen 2 yrs ago



Brussels, The Netherlands; An address by King William III, transcribed and delivered by missive to the governments of Prussia, France, Italy and Britain,


Every treaty ever written has been built on the scattered ashes of the treaty preceding it. We live in an age where every sovereign affair of every nation in Europe is decided upon by treaty, by an agreement coerced onto that nation's government, rather than by nation will. A few naive men in Constantinople might think that to be the natural way to govern a continent, but if the current affairs of Europe, if the rising tensions that have grown and festered since the Treaty of Constantinople was enacted are any indication, that style of governance is inept and unresponsive.

Flanders and the Netherlands are one nation. I feel as strongly for the Flemish as I do for Hollanders and the people of Drenthe or Groningen. My title, the King of the Netherlands, is not restricted to any specific portion of the Dutch homeland. I am the King of the Dutch, your King. I was born in this very city! I am as much a foreigner to you as any of your neighbours. It is unfortunate that war had to be waged to unite you with your northern brothers, to bring me back to my homeland. Unfortunate, but absolutely necessary. The Frenchmen that ruled over you before would not surrender you willingly. You are a proud people with a prosperous land, and they did not earn your place into their 'nation' fairly in the first place, so I knew, and the Royal Netherlands Army knew, that they would not yield to fairness and justice in returning you.

When the armies that came to liberate Flanders reached Brussels, King Leopold fled. He retreated to France. This complicates the matter of signing peace with him. Perhaps he thought that I had some ridiculous plan to execute him or keep him locked in some tower somewhere. Let me start by saying that I am insulted by such fears, but continue with a declaration of understanding. If Leopold returns to me here, in the Netherlands, in Flanders, no harm is going to come to him. I merely wish to finalize the peace process, and return the Lowlands to how they ought be. The same matter goes for the Belgian navy, now docked in French harbours. If the French are not interested in attempting to restore Napoleon's imperium over the Netherlands, than I see no reason for them to continue to hold onto Dutch ships, or the King of Belgium. Return both, and we can have a sincere, lasting peace. If Leopold comes to the table amicably and brings the Belgian Navy with him, the future of Wallonia can be discussed upon his arrival. Until then, in the interest of continued unity of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Wallonia shall be militarily occupied by the Royal Dutch Army.
The Treaty of Brussels


I. The region of Flanders, in full, is hereby recognized to be a constituent territory of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

II. King William I, sovereign of the Kingdom of Prussia and King William III, sovereign of the Kingdom of the Netherlands both hereby denounce the neutrality of the former territory of Neutral Moresnet, which is recognized by both countries to be integral territory of the Kingdom of Prussia.

III. King William III, King of the Netherlands, hereby surrenders the title of Grand Duke of Luxembourg to King William I, King of Prussia.

IV. King William I, sovereign of the Kingdom of Prussia, hereby recognizes that the Duchy of Limburg is an integral territory of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, and is not a part of any German confederation or in any way politically united with any political entity but the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

V. The region of Wallonia, in full, is hereby recognized to be a region of the Kingdom of Belgium militarily occupied by the Kingdom of the Netherlands, pending negotiation with the sovereign of the Kingdom of Belgium. Until such time as negotiations can take place, the Belgian acceptance of this treaty shall be signed by King William III, in his facility as King of the Netherlands, as per the unconditional surrender of the Belgian forces to the authority of the Kingdom of the Netherlands When peace is formally agreed between the sovereign of Belgium and the sovereign of the Netherlands, it will be finalized by the signing of this treaty by the sovereign of Belgium.

[X] King William III, King of the Netherlands.
[X] King William I, King of Prussia, Grand Duke of Luxembourg.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Rare
Raw
Avatar of Rare

Rare The Inquisitor

Member Seen 7 yrs ago


Império do Brasil (Empire of Brazil)
Independência ou Morte!


I'm sick by the actions of Prussia and the Netherlands, they declared war on a nation for no other reason than regaining their territory! They just killed off men, that were defending their country, now those families are affected by the lost of their husbands, fathers, sons, or brothers! Now, they want Mr. Leopold and the Belgium navy to come back for peace talks. I believe that they're lying and want to kill him so they can take over Belguim!

The Netherlands broke the London Treaty and Prussia broke Article 1 of the Treaty of Constantinople. As the Article states: "It is hereby agreed that the signatories will do all in their power to ensure that war on the European continent does not occur". Yet, they went to war against Belguim! I request that Mr. Leopold, the King of Belguim, and the navy of Belguim to stay at France to avoid death! They're also welcome to stay at Brazil if their enemies come marching for him or France agrees to kick the king and his navy out of their country.

~ Emperor Pedro II, King of Brazil.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Kho
Raw
Avatar of Kho

Kho

Member Seen 5 mos ago





Having reviewed the matter, the Ottoman Empire, having hosted the Conference of Constantinople, believes it must respond to this most shocking development in Europe.

We are appalled by the savage, cold blooded murder perpetuated by Prussia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands. Without warning or attempting negotiation with Belgium, they have attacked this peaceful nation, murdered its people and now stand waving the banner of peace and attempting to gain the moral high ground. The Ottoman Empire recognises who is in the right and who is in the wrong, and we do not believe any excuses made by the aggressors need be made, there is no excuse.

The Kingdom of the Netherlands, with utter contempt for Europe-wide peace and disrespect for the ongoing negotiations at Turin concerning the Treaty of Constantinople, claim that the treaty has created tensions in Europe. We completely disagree. The only tensions created by the treaty are those which nations like the Netherlands created by spilling blood and revealing their crazed, expansionistic desires which were so threatened by the Treaty of Constantinople.

The Netherlands claims that the French and Belgians would never have agreed to surrender Flanders to the Netherlands. We would like to point out that the only nation in Europe which has willingly made territorial concessions for the sake of peace has been France, which surrendered Alsace-Lorraine to the German Confederation. The Netherlands’ claim that only military force could result in Flanders being transferred to the Netherlands is thus baseless and unfounded. If anything, France has proven it is more than willing to concede land for the sake of peace. However, those who wish for war need no excuse, and the fact such an excuse was made goes only to show the level of moral degeneration of the aggressors.

Having attacked Belgium and murdered her sons, the Netherlands’ pledge to King Leopold that they ‘wish him no harm’ is undermined. If the Netherlands truly wished Belgium no harm they would have initiated negotiations and discussed the issue, with Prussia as a neutral mediator, not a war-mongering supporter of one side over the other. We are quite frankly shocked by both Prussia’a and the Netherlands’ actions and request immediate withdrawal from Belgian lands, including Flanders. Further negotiations can be initiated once there has been a full withdrawal, else we shall call upon all signatories of the Treaty of Constantinople, as well as all those who support Article 1, to take drastic military measures to forcefully remove Dutch forces from Belgium, a measure we are most averse to taking.

In regards to the Prussian hassling of Austria due to its professed neutrality, we would like to point Prussia towards the Treaty of Constantinople wherein it was agreed, and I quote, “It is hereby recognised by all the signatories that the Kingdom of Prussia and the Austrian Empire shall act as neutral mediators in Europe when war threatens to erupt, and will do all in their power to uphold Article 1.”

Thus not only is Austria proudly neutral, but so too is Prussia, and it is for the German Confederation to see as is written here, in ink, and signed by Prussia, in clear, unmistakable writing.

His Highness, Mehmed Emin Aali Pasha, Foreign Minister of the Ottoman Empire
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



The following was spoken at an unprecedented press conference by Minister-President von Bismarck when asked about the Ottoman Empire's comments.

"There is a subtle difference between the terms 'neutral mediator' and 'neutral party' that may be lost on our Turkish friends due to the barbaric simplicity of their backwards language. For that, they are to be forgiven. As well, I send them an up-to-date map, since they believe Flanders is a French province, which hasn't been so since Bonaparte.

In any conflict between a German State and France, Prussia would do its best to consider the interests of both sides equally, hence, neutral mediator. However, if the lands within the German Confederation ever of a member of the German Confederation came under French attack, Prussia would immediately come to its defense, Austria included. In this way, Prussia is a neutral mediator, nit a neutral party.

Austria declared itself a neutral party, calling into question if it would defend the territorial integrity of a German State if it was attacked. To this, Austria has yet to clearly state that if a German State for any reason was attacked, that it would be defended, and that is concerning.

As neutral mediator, Prussia determined the first thing to do was put an immediate halt to the violence. The justice of the Netherlands cause could not be denied, and so peace was made at the expense of the Belgians. With the war over, negotiations can begin.

Prussia also believes that a Flemish revolt would have been bloodier and appropriately did all in its power to prevent one."
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Ampharos
Raw

Ampharos

Member Seen 6 yrs ago



Kaiserthum Oesterreich
The Austrian Empire


The Austrian Empire will not entertain this folly any longer. The Kingdom of Prussia grasps at straws as it attempts to keep its argument afloat and outright refuses to acknowledge the generosity bestowed upon the German Confederation by the signatories of the Treaty of Constantinople, including the French Empire.

Furthermore, the Austrian Empire reminds the Kingdom of Prussia that it opted to become a neutral third party not within the German Confederation but between the French Empire and the Kingdom of Prussia. We would like to point out that the Kingdom of Prussia threatened war with the French Empire shortly before the Treaty of Constantinople was signed, endangering both the German Confederation and its inhabitants and disrupting the Concert of Europe.

Austria remains a neutral third party in quelling the Kingdom of Prussia’s aggression, first evident by its aggression against the French Empire and presently by its blatant violation of Article I of the Treaty of Constantinople.

We will no longer dignify this dribble with a response. We hope that the Minister-President of the Kingdom of Prussia overcomes his apparent alcohol problem, as it is clearly affecting his capacity to make rational decisions and coherent arguments.

Good day.

- Johann Bernhard von Rechberg und Rothenlöwen, Foreign Minister
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



The following was spoken at the same press conference by Minister-President von Bismarck when handed a telegram regarding Austria's remarks.

"I grow weary of Austrian bloviating. Therefore I demand a simple one-word affirmation or denial.

If French troops set a single boot on Prussian-not Belgian-land, will Austria aid its German brother in repelling them? Ja, or nein?"
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by null123
Raw

null123

Member Seen 9 mos ago


Βασίλειο της Ελλάδα(Kingdom of Greece)


"I will say this in light of recent events. We, the Kingdom of Greece, recognize the region known as Flanders belonging to the Kingdom of the Netherlands. We believe it should be the goal of all nations to unify with the brethren in other lands, and thus also congratulate The Netherlands for the actions they have taken to secure Flanders. We also further congratulate the Kingdom of Prussia, our dear friends and allies, on the support of the Netherlands. We will say this to all who would attack the Netherlands for there noble goal of reclaiming the lands where there brethren are, we will provide military aid and support to them if it comes down to it. If Prussia or the Netherlands call on us for aid, we will join them. May whatever god that do exist smile on you today the Netherlands, and we wish you good fortune if someone would dare stop you form unifying with your brethren."
-King Otto of Greece.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by salamimike
Raw
Avatar of salamimike

salamimike Probably not even real.

Member Seen 2 mos ago


Empire Français (French Empire)
Liberté, egalité, fraternité


It seems our old friends the Belgians are in rather a mess at the moment. They have been kicked out of their homes and forced to run into neighbours provinces.
I feel peace talks are pointless at this time. When one party has already been dominated there is no place for peace. Only the complete destruction of the defending side. This has already happened, Belgium has been claimed by an enemy far greater than it, and Belgium is no more.

I am saddened that no peace talks had been discussed on the subject, that military action was the only step taken. To the Belgians now occupying France, I assure you that you may stay here as long as you need to. This also go's to the Belgian king Leopold, who I advise to stay deep in French borders.

So I finish. Bravo Prussia and the Netherlands. You have proven you can destroy and steal quite expertly.
But, as other countries seem far more aggressive than I, I must warn you.
Have fun with your new lands.
Whilst you still can.

- Emperor Napoleon III of the Second French Empire.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by thorgili
Raw

thorgili

Member Seen 7 yrs ago



The Russian people would like to congratulate the Dutch and the Prussians at their success in regaining their old lands back which where wrongly taken by the Belgians. We would also like to thank the Romanians on their wise decision to accept the Treaty of Odessa and hope that from this treaty a new age of prosperity and unity between the slavic peoples may occur. As for France's petty threats I believe they shouldn't call the kettle black, their support of the sovereignty of minor nations is hypocritical and humorous at best, we need not remind them of the Napoleonic era in which they conquered most of the German states. all the Prussians and the dutch are doing is regaining the land that belonged to their peoples. But I digress I must say if the french mobilize their forces against the Prussians or the Netherlands I will be forced to assist the Prussians and the dutch in the defense of their newly gained lands.
-Tsar Alexander II, Autocrat of the Russias, King of Poland, Grand Prince of Poland, and the Liberator Tsar
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



The following statement by von Bismarck was published in a major Prussian paper.

"To preface this reveal of the true Treaty of Constantinople, I must profess that I was afflicted with wild-eyed idealism. So much do I love Germany, that when the French offered Elsass-Lothringen and when all signatories offered Schleswig-Holstein to be returned to Germany, I could not refuse. Only now have I realized the error of my ways. I too eagerly accepted peace's sweet presence, too eagerly accepted that there could be a legitimate reason for keeping a treaty secret and lying to the whole world. I did not see that rather than peace, it brought only slavery to all the excluded members, and even Prussia, for so vaguely worded was it that even Prussian liberation of Flanders to end the Belgo-Dutch war nearly caused war! Today, I announce Prussia's formal withdrawal from the treaty of Constantinople. As part of my penance, I reveal the entire secret combination to the world at large. Any fair-minded journalist is invited to Berlin to inspect our copy of the treaty to see if it is genuine, including the affixed seals.

'The following treaty is in accordance with the agreements between the Concert of Europe, made up of the Second French Empire, the United Kingdom (together the French Federation of Great Britain), the Prussian Empire, the Russian Empire (together the Prusso-Russian Alliance), the Austrian Empire and the Ottoman Empire in the year 1861 at the Conference of Constantinople. This treaty shall remain in effect until three or more of the signatories see it fit to end or renegotiate the terms. Annulment of this treaty must be declared 48 months prior to the date of termination.

Article 1: It is hereby agreed that ‘Europe’, within its broader definition as encompassing Western Russia and Asia Minor, as well as all the integral lands of the signatories, shall be a region kept free of all war.

--Section 1: All wars between the signatories shall hereby take place outside of Europe

--Section 2: All wars within Europe shall be quashed by the combined power of all the signatories, even if two or more of the signatories are embroiled in war outside Europe

----Clause 1: In the case of one nation attacking another nation, the signatories will side against the aggressor unless a vote decides otherwise.
----Clause 2: In the case of unaffiliated groups attacking a nation, the signatories will aim to bring said groups to justice either through military intervention or by demanding their surrender to the nearest recognised authority.
----Clause 3: In a situation where an attack by an unaffiliated group causes a declaration of war against the nation of origin of said group, then the same measures will be taken as in the above clause, unless otherwise voted by the signatories.
----Clause 4: In the case that a signatory finds itself close to war with a non-signatory it will bring the issue to the Austrian Empire as the mediator for Europe. In a case where the Austrian Empire is the signatory in question then the issue should be brought to the other signatories to solve.
----Clause 5: In a situation where war is declared upon a signatory by a non-signatory then all signatories will come to the support of the signatory.
----Clause 6: In a situation where a signatory declares war on another nation and fighting occurs within Europe, then other signatories will attempt to mediate. If mediation fails then military might will have to brought to bear against the aggressor.
----Clause 7: A conflict within Europe is considered to be at an end when either the aggressor’s surrender has been accepted by the defender or the signatories have all accepted the aggressor’s surrender.

Article 2: It is hereby recognised by all the signatories that each signatory has undisputed authority and jurisdiction over particular regions of the world, and whose say in issues which arise in said regions is final.
--Section 1: The region of Northern Europe, recognised as encompassing the British Isles, France, the regions of north-western Russia, and the Scandinavian nations, falls under the sphere of influence of the Kingdom of Prussia, who shall act as a mediator between the signatories and have authority over the minor nations of in said region.
--Section 1.1: The region of Southern Europe, recognised as encompassing Spain, Sardinia, Sicily, the Italian Peninsula, and Switzerland, falls under the sphere of influence of the Austrian Empire, who shall act as a mediator between the signatories and have authority over the minor nations of said region.
--Section 1.2: Both the Austrian Empire and Prussian Kingdom shall share the responsibility of mediator in the German Confederation in order to maintain peace and order.
--Section 2: The region of North America, recognised as encompassing Mexico and all the territories north of it, as well as Sub-Saharan Africa, recognised as the Congo Basin territories and everything south of them, and the territories of eastern Africa, as well as India fall under the sphere of influence of the FFGB.
--Section 3: The regions of eastern Asia, stretching over China, the Japanese islands, Korea, Siam and other territories south of China, as well as the various islands in the eastern Indian Ocean, all fall under the sphere of influence of the Russian Empire.
--Section 4: The regions of North Africa, far east as Egypt to Morocco in the west, and all the territories north of the Congo Basin territories, as well as the Balkans and Caucuses, the Arabian Peninsula, Persia and Central Asia – recognised as the territories stretching from the Persian border to the Chinese border, and north from the Russian border to the border of British India, all fall under the sphere of influence of the Ottoman Empire.

Article 2.1: A signatory cannot halt or hinder trade between a nation in their respective sphere of influence and another signatory, unless there is a state of war between the signatory in question and a nation or nations within their sphere of influence.

Article 2.2: A signatory has undisputed authority over their respective sphere/s of influence, wherein their decisions concerning all matters are considered final and binding as law to the other signatories.
--Section 1: A signatory can freely intervene in conflicts which occur within its sphere of influence without hindrance or lash-out from other signatories.
--Section 2: A signatory has a responsibility to ensure that the humanitarian needs of those in their sphere of influence are met, and can request help from other signatories in order to meet this responsibility.
--Section 3: A signatory has the full right to redraw borders, seize land, surrender land, or transfer land from one nation to another within their sphere of influence.
--Section 4: The above sections apply to all spheres of influence bar Central Europe, where different privileges and responsibilities apply.
----Clause 1: The signatory with authority over Central Europe has responsibility has a neutral mediator between signatories in the Central European sphere of influence as well as between signatories and non-signatories.
----Clause 2: The signatory with authority over Central Europe has the responsibility to maintain peace in their sphere and ensure the articles of this treaty concerning war in Europe are upheld.
----Clause 3: The signatory with authority over Central Europe has the final say in matters regarding peace treaties, tributes to be paid by aggressors, redrawing of borders, and the transfer of land within Europe.
----Clause 4: In a case where the signatory with authority over Europe is embroiled in conflict or is close to becoming so, the other signatories will act as mediators.

Article 3: All signatories hereby support the transfer of Veneto from the Austrian Empire to the Kingdom of Italy for the sum of 5 million British pounds.

Article 4: All signatories accept the independence of the city of Rome from Italy and under the control of the Papal State.

Article 5: The territories of Alsace-Lorraine shall be transferred from the control of the Second French Empire to the German Confederation, to be administered by the Austrian Empire until the territory can govern itself.

Article 5.1: All signatories accept Prussia’s claim to the territories of Schleswig-Holstein and will support them in reclaiming this land for the German Confederation, to come under direct Prussian control.

Article 6: The demilitarisation of the Black Sea region shall hereby be removed and the military vessels of both Russia and the Ottoman Empire will be able to pass freely in the area.

Article 7: Signatories imposing a blockade on either the Union or the Confederacy will allow trade to pass if a tribute is paid.
--Section 1: 25% of income gained from trading with either the Confederacy or the Union shall be gifted as tribute to the blockading party.
--Section 2: Should goods imported from the Union or Confederacy be traded with the blockading party, there will be a 10% deduction on the tribute paid.

This is all as has been agreed, and we hold all signatories firmly to their word,

[X] Queen Victoria, the United Kingdom

[X] Emperor Napoleon III, the Second French Empire

[x] King William I, the Kingdom of Prussia

[X] Kaiser Franz Joseph I, the Austrian Empire

[X] Tsar Alexander II, the Russian Empire

[X] Sultan Abdülmecid I, the Ottoman Empire"
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Dedonus
Raw
Avatar of Dedonus

Dedonus Kai su teknon;

Member Seen 25 days ago


Scandinavian Commonwealth


Salutations to Leopold, the rightful King of Belgium,

The Kingdom of Denmark gives their fullest condolences to you and all your people who have either been driven into exile or are now under the yoke of the Kingdom of the Netherlands. While we have not suffered as much as you and your people, the Danes have also endured the wrath of the Prussian Warmongers. The people of Denmark shall pray for a swift return for you to the seat of Belgium.

God Bless,

Frederick VII, King of Denmark and Duke of Schleswig
The Scandinavian Commonwealth to intervene in Belgian crisis? Punish those barbaric Germans?
--Aftonbladet headline
The United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway wishes to stamp out these rumors of Scandinavian intervention in the conflicts of the European Continent. At this time, no plans of intervene are being made. We are not at liberty to give out any more information.
--A notice in Post- och Inrikes Tidningar
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by So Boerd
Raw

So Boerd

Member Seen 9 yrs ago



Article 1: The Kingdoms of Prussia and Spain recognize a long standing amicable relationship, and in ever more turbulent world, the need for safety and security.
Article 2: The Kingdom of Prussia and the Kingdom of Spain therefore commit to come to the other's aid in the event either should declare war or have war declared on them.

- Queen Isabella II, the Kingdom of Spain
- King William I, the Kingdom of Prussia
↑ Top
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet