1 Guest viewing this page
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

Submarines wont be added into the game because they will add nothing good to it.

Atm these are the counters in WoWS:

Cruisers at range>Destroyers and aircraft
BB>Cruiser
Carrier>BB
Destroyer>Everything except for cruisers at range.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Alfhedil
Raw
Avatar of Alfhedil

Alfhedil What do you see Kaneda?

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

DDs actually have to get in pretty close to do most of their damage, since they rely on torps to deal damage. The Carrier advantage is also nullified by decent AA. Cruisers do pretty well on average, and can lay down punishing accurate fire on BBs from range, but if the BB actually hits them they will be wishing to be somewhere else. It's not quite as "rock paper scissors" as it seems to be.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Keyguyperson
Raw
Avatar of Keyguyperson

Keyguyperson Welcome to Cyberhell

Member Seen 6 mos ago

To me the game seems rock/paper/scissors, but not in the usual class > class way. Basically, certain classes beat certain classes depending on range and tactics. A destroyer can wreck face with surprise tactics and short range, but if a battleship sees it then that's it for the destroyer. A carrier can handle almost anything at long range, but the moment any ship at all gets close up it's sunk. Cruisers, being the jack of all trades that they are, can use almost battleship-like tactics combined with mobility to take out nearly anything. Unless, of course, that anything is a battleship. That's the way I see it, of course. I'll need some practice to actually figure out the system.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Alfhedil
Raw
Avatar of Alfhedil

Alfhedil What do you see Kaneda?

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

Yeah, that's about it really. It's surprisingly balanced and well made for a Wargaming product, which makes me hopeful for the full release when it's ready.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Keyguyperson
Raw
Avatar of Keyguyperson

Keyguyperson Welcome to Cyberhell

Member Seen 6 mos ago

Yeah, that's about it really. It's surprisingly balanced and well made for a Wargaming product, which makes me hopeful for the full release when it's ready.


Good to hear, all I've seen are a few short clips.

Short clips of the Yamato.
Hidden 10 yrs ago 10 yrs ago Post by KaiserAuto
Raw
Avatar of KaiserAuto

KaiserAuto A Genius and let none deny it.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

The Yamato's basic stats were indeed on top of most, if not all other battleships, however, they did not have the technological advantage. That belonged to the US in the pacific theater. Granted, when you get battleships such as the Yamato into close combat, where range technology plays no role, you are pretty fucking scr00d, but I still hold firm belief in either the Montana or the german Battleships, mainly due to historic record.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

The Yamato's basic stats were indeed on top of most, if not all other battleships, however, they did not have the technological advantage. That belonged to the US in the pacific theater.


The edge the American BBs had was that they had a better firing control, AA and they had a better radar. The Yamato had better armour and firepower. But in comparison the Bismarck class had firing control which was on par with 1945 American BBs. And the Bismarck is probably gonna be the tier 7 German BB... Imagine the tier 10 one! :D
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by KaiserAuto
Raw
Avatar of KaiserAuto

KaiserAuto A Genius and let none deny it.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

I can't, mainly because the Bismark and Tirpitz were the greatest battleships the kriegsmarinen fielded.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

I can't, mainly because the Bismark and Tirpitz were the greatest battleships the kriegsmarinen fielded.


Yes, but there were multiple designs for even bigger BBs. Heck, some sources state that the Bismarck and Tirpitz were Battlecruisers. In the Kriegsmarine they were classified as pocket-batttleships. There had been plans for bigger ships like the Von Moltke class, which would have been on par with the Yamato.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by KaiserAuto
Raw
Avatar of KaiserAuto

KaiserAuto A Genius and let none deny it.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

Oh, certainly, I thought that this game would be based on ships that actually did sail, but then again, that would maybe be a bit too bare for the game.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

Oh, certainly, I thought that this game would be based on ships that actually did sail, but then again, that would maybe be a bit too bare for the game.


Well, in the Beta there are already ships which didnt exist. Like the tier 4 Japanese BB.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Alfhedil
Raw
Avatar of Alfhedil

Alfhedil What do you see Kaneda?

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by KaiserAuto>

Well, in the Beta there are already ships which didnt exist. Like the tier 4 Japanese BB.


There's only so much you can do for a tech tree with existing ships. At some point they have to use paper-ships.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by KaiserAuto
Raw
Avatar of KaiserAuto

KaiserAuto A Genius and let none deny it.

Member Seen 9 yrs ago

I haven't stayed too in-depth in my overview of the game.
I simply hope that the H-44 won't make it in game, I pray to the gods.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

I haven't stayed too in-depth in my overview of the game.
I simply hope that the H-44 won't make it in game, I pray to the gods.


Pff... It only has 8 × 50.8 cm (20.0 in) guns...
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

So... What was that all about? ^
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Durandal
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Durandal

Durandal Lord Commissar

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by KaiserAuto>

Pff... It only has 8 × 50.8 cm (20.0 in) guns...


Yay bigger guns! *Torpedoes H-44 from submarine* Now what were you saying?
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Alfhedil
Raw
Avatar of Alfhedil

Alfhedil What do you see Kaneda?

Member Seen 2 hrs ago

<Snipped quote by Zoldyck>

Yay bigger guns! *Torpedoes H-44 from submarine* Now what were you saying?


Too bad there will never be subs in WoWS.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Durandal
Raw
coGM
Avatar of Durandal

Durandal Lord Commissar

Member Seen 7 yrs ago

But everyone needs submarines... :(

Oh well, I don't play it anyways.
Hidden 10 yrs ago Post by Zoldyck
Raw
Avatar of Zoldyck

Zoldyck

Member Seen 13 days ago

But everyone needs submarines... :(

Oh well, I don't play it anyways.


Subs would only be annoying to fight against and boring to play with in WoWS.
1x Like Like
↑ Top
1 Guest viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet