@Dynamo Frokane
Yes, there's still room for those who have shown interest beforehand.
Yes, there's still room for those who have shown interest beforehand.
This RP is certainly getting traction very quickly. How many people before we begin?
4. Military rules apply (no possession of weaponry or sharp objects while in the base, superiors must be greeted with sir or their respective rank and so on...)
Are you trying to start a flamewar/dick-measuring contest?
Man shit happens. I don't really mind! Guess I'm not that good as a GM and just need to take it slower, huh?
I had a thought, considering the chance for negative synchro to occur. I have to wonder which Framewerk would prove the most dangerous should that situation occur, and I'm curious to see what everyone thinks on the matter, as to which of our current group of Framewerks would be the most of a problem in the case of negative synchro.
<Snipped quote by Eisenhorn>
As far as I have seen, its familiarity and expectation. For example: Archer, a quadruped design I would have gone with if Rose had been denied, I think would move like a tank. If the driver was previously a tank operator, it would be easy to do with maximum synchro but someone without even a drivers license would loose their mind trying to figure it all out.
And this was my 'go to' big robot influence. It later got a big boost from 'Big O'
---- Youtube Link removed ----
<Snipped quote by knighthawk>
I'm gonna agree here. I would not be surprised by a low starting synchro rate for the Archer, though I hope that isn't the case. That being said, I think the designation of "Most Dangerous" would heavily depend on the match-up. The ones that would be able to mess with the Archer the most would be the melee Framewerks, as they exploit the Archer's major weakness.
My main Mecha influences are Gundam (NGE was a bit before my time), and Metal Gear Solid.