5 Guests viewing this page
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Lugubrious
Raw
GM
Avatar of Lugubrious

Lugubrious Player on the other side

Member Seen 16 min ago

All done.


^People looking at the results.................................................................me^

Be gentle
1x Laugh Laugh 1x Thank Thank
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by MULTI_MEDIA_MAN
Raw
Avatar of MULTI_MEDIA_MAN

MULTI_MEDIA_MAN

Member Seen 2 days ago

So, who actually got First place doe?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Kaithas
Raw
Avatar of Kaithas

Kaithas One Jump Man

Member Seen 1 yr ago

Yeah, note to self. Start entries more than two hours before the deadline. Didn't get to develop a few of the concepts as much as I'd have liked to, especially the calling card.

But... It's now time for me to reveal my true source of inspiration.

I challenged myself to make the most evil char I could, based on...

Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Guess Who
Raw
Avatar of Guess Who

Guess Who The Nameless Writer

Member Seen 10 hrs ago

I've lost again! I have brought shame and dishonor on my family! There is only one option. I must commit...

SUDOKU!
1x Like Like 2x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Onarax
Raw
Avatar of Onarax

Onarax Sleepy

Member Seen 1 yr ago

Woah I won.

Kind of surprised tbh, thought Lugu would shun me for the length.

Thanks.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by HereComesTheSnow
Raw
Avatar of HereComesTheSnow

HereComesTheSnow dehydration expert

Member Seen 15 hrs ago

Hidden 9 yrs ago 9 yrs ago Post by Krayzikk
Raw
Avatar of Krayzikk

Krayzikk The Snark Knight

Member Seen 4 days ago

Congratulations to all the winners, and I'm not really surprised by the selections made. You all did a fantastic job. I'd go more in depth, but for about half of you I did that ages ago. =P

That said, I do have a mild objection. I saw several people (I think I counted three, including myself) that were largely disqualified from consideration because they "weren't enough of a bad guy". Now, this might seem a little odd given that the contest was to make a villainous version of our characters... But that's just it. Neither the term "bad guy" nor "villain" actually denote a degree of evil. Even the more detailed aspects of the contest overview didn't provide an indicator of "must be this evil to qualify".

Both villain and bad guy simply refer to the antagonistic force with evil methods of a given work of fiction. In fact, every entry in the entire contest was significantly more evil than every canon RWBY villain. Ben (who I use as an example only because I'm the most familiar with him), by all accounts intended as an Anti-Villain, kills people. There are only two antagonists in RWBY with an existent death tally, and that tally amounts to one person.

I suppose my complaint is that the contest descriptor only really indicated that we should be making the villain of a story, and villains aren't inherently mass murdering mentally unstable people. Mass murdering mentally unstable people qualify, beyond a shadow of a doubt, as villains; but so do characters with goals and personalities that, were it not for their methods, would easily be on the side of the angels.

In the future, it'd be nice if we could know to what degree we're supposed to do something. There are characters with significantly less evil methods that were considered, while some with evil methods but nobler goals weren't deemed villainous enough. It'd be nice to know for the future so I, and others, don't have to default to the generic extreme just so we can be sure we meet the standards.

Because by the definitions given, every entry was villainous. It just seems like there was a metric we were missing.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by harinezumikouken
Raw
Avatar of harinezumikouken

harinezumikouken Bloodstarved Beast

Member Seen 4 yrs ago

Woah I won.

Kind of surprised tbh, thought Lugu would shun me for the length.

Thanks.


1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Onarax
Raw
Avatar of Onarax

Onarax Sleepy

Member Seen 1 yr ago

<Snipped quote by Onarax>

snip


Does this mean Evil!Napoli won a bet against Bianca and got her wings?
1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Abillioncats
Raw
Avatar of Abillioncats

Abillioncats Nyahahah you found me!

Member Seen 1 yr ago

Oh cool I actually got third place. =D
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Crimmy
Raw
Avatar of Crimmy

Crimmy Oi brat, what're ye using that noggin for?

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

[4:30:50 PM] Onarax: Looks like Napoli ends up on top of Gratia.


1x Laugh Laugh
Hidden 9 yrs ago 9 yrs ago Post by Lugubrious
Raw
GM
Avatar of Lugubrious

Lugubrious Player on the other side

Member Seen 16 min ago

Congratulations to all the winners, and I'm not really surprised by the selections made. You all did a fantastic job. I'd go more in depth, but for about half of you I did that ages ago. =P

That said, I do have a mild objection. I saw several people (I think I counted three, including myself) that were largely disqualified from consideration because they "weren't enough of a bad guy". Now, this might seem a little odd given that the contest was to make a villainous version of our characters... But that's just it. Neither the term "bad guy" nor "villain" actually denote a degree of evil. Even the more detailed aspects of the contest overview didn't provide an indicator of "must be this evil to qualify".

Both villain and bad guy simply refer to the antagonistic force with evil methods of a given work of fiction. In fact, every entry in the entire contest was significantly more evil than every canon RWBY villain. Ben (who I use as an example only because I'm the most familiar with him), by all accounts intended as an Anti-Villain, kills people. There are only two antagonists in RWBY with an existent death tally, and that tally amounts to one person.

I suppose my complaint is that the contest descriptor only really indicated that we should be making the villain of a story, and villains aren't inherently mass murdering mentally unstable people. Mass murdering mentally unstable people qualify, beyond a shadow of a doubt, as villains; but so do characters with goals and personalities that, were it not for their methods, would easily be on the side of the angels.

In the future, it'd be nice if we could know to what degree we're supposed to do something. There are characters with significantly less evil methods that were considered, while some with evil methods but nobler goals weren't deemed villainous enough. It'd be nice to know for the future so I, and others, don't have to default to the generic extreme just so we can be sure we meet the standards.

Because by the definitions given, every entry was villainous. It just seems like there was a metric we were missing.


I took the term 'bad guy' as the deciding factor here. To me, bad guy is not debatable; to have bad as the main qualifier, you've got to be doing so much bad that the label envelops the character. This isn't Wreck-it Ralph. To be on the opposing side isn't enough, and to accomplish good things in bad ways is to be degrees of an anti-hero. The reason Grane qualified is because he hasn't accomplished anything good, and it's up to real debate whether or not he ever will. That's part of the tragedy. It makes him a bad guy; all the great things that Ben has done for people make him a good guy with a bad rap by some people. If I want evil, I'd rather have an evil character than just evil methods. I'll admit that evil is a broad term, and murderlusting serial killers have a place there at one end of the spectrum, but I'm not at all, I don't think, encouraging a generic standard. The top five entries were all unique, despite the fact that they all killed people.

As for you bringing up the canon...why? Our contests are something that's non-canon in a non-canon fan work of an actual thing. The most creative liberties can be taken here.

I'm sorry my judging style didn't appeal to you. Your main post is right, there's an unclear metric in play: me. I can't give a real metric of what I like and don't like, and the limited scope of what I ask for compared to the massive spectrum of what I got. I could only draw the line in the sand after combing the beach. If that makes me suck as a judge, so be it, but if nobody makes a contest for a month, I'll be the one that does it, and people have only to not participate to make me stop.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Guess Who
Raw
Avatar of Guess Who

Guess Who The Nameless Writer

Member Seen 10 hrs ago

<Snipped quote>


I just knew I'd see @harinezumikouken laugh at that. It was too dirty of a joke for him not to.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Crimmy
Raw
Avatar of Crimmy

Crimmy Oi brat, what're ye using that noggin for?

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

to accomplish good things in bad ways is to be degrees of an anti-hero.


An antihero is a merely a protagonist who lacks conventional heroic qualities.
Hidden 9 yrs ago 9 yrs ago Post by Onarax
Raw
Avatar of Onarax

Onarax Sleepy

Member Seen 1 yr ago

<Snipped quote by Lugubrious>

An antihero is a merely a protagonist who lacks conventional heroic qualities.


Still stealing my Skype quotes I see.

EDIT: Should probably add that by the same token, an Anti-Villain is simply a Villain with heroic qualities and/or goals. So the either have evil goals with relatively moral means of achieving them, or good goals with brutal and evil means of achieving them.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Crimmy
Raw
Avatar of Crimmy

Crimmy Oi brat, what're ye using that noggin for?

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Crimmy>

Still stealing my Skype quotes I see.


Nah, this time it was more like Newton and Leibniz.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Suku
Raw
Avatar of Suku

Suku Praetor

Member Seen 1 yr ago

@Lugubrious "You might consider checking for spelling and grammatical errors sometimes."

Not complaining I kind of rushed it beyond personality which I was banking on which I admit isn't the best idea. Beyond that those grammatical and spelling errors yah I learned english as a third language so its going to happen I suppose I barely get by for papers in college because of that.
1x Thank Thank
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Onarax
Raw
Avatar of Onarax

Onarax Sleepy

Member Seen 1 yr ago

<Snipped quote by Onarax>

Nah, this time it was more like Newton and Leibniz.


So, we're mathematical genius now?

Can I be Newton?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Guess Who
Raw
Avatar of Guess Who

Guess Who The Nameless Writer

Member Seen 10 hrs ago

The best explanation I've heard for the differences between heroes, villains, anti-heroes, and anti-villains are as follows:

Heroes: People who do good deeds for good reasons
Villains: People who do evil deeds for evil reasons
Anti-Heroes: People who do evil deeds for good reasons
Anti-Villains: People who do good deeds for evil reasons
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Crimmy
Raw
Avatar of Crimmy

Crimmy Oi brat, what're ye using that noggin for?

Member Seen 6 yrs ago

<Snipped quote by Crimmy>

So, we're mathematical genius now?

Can I be Newton?


You do remember which one of us is the bigger asshole, right?
↑ Top
5 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet