As you wish, now Pollen is going to come and insult me for being unable to debate with people again.
Eh, it wasn't so much that you were unable to debate with people. I was just saying that it was always worth a try, that it was possible to understand each other in such situations...
Seems you were right in this case though. I guess you two just don't get along? :P
Anyways, I read Iolanthe's post, and I don't see the problem with it. Sequence of actions appears to be as follows:
- Sigurd attacks Iolanthe's left leg with his sword (striking diagonally downwards). This leg is nearest Sigurd, and is more or less under her shield.
- Iolanthe kneels down, and the sword ends up hitting around hip-height, where the armored skirt prevents the sword from cutting in (blunt impact might still hurt, but at least she doesn't lose a leg).
- At the same time, she brings her shield arm down on top of the sword and Sigurd's hand. Her gladius is held facing downwards, the blow is moving downwards, and she aims to stab Sigurd's wrist from above.
- Then she basically flails her spear at his legs, trying to drive him off.
IDK what Melon is finding wrong with this? He said the sword would be pointing the wrong way, and technically it would, except there's this thing called a
wrist, that would allow Iolanthe to change the angle of the blade relative to her arm. Having acted out the motion myself, according to the post's description, I can say with certainty that the amount of wrist movement required would not even be strenuous, let alone impossible.
So yeah, based on what I see, Melon's current complaints don't seem to hold much weight. If there's anything I missed, then feel free to let me know, but for now I see no reason to change anything.
(Also, I'd recommend not talking about previous rulings and arguments, because honestly what good is going to come of that?
'Focus on ze now!')