<Snipped quote by LHG100>

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>

Yeah I should probably clarify: When I call people "idiotic-ass fucking piles of shit" or anything else really I generally don't mean it. If I do, you'll probably be able to tell you fuckmaggot.

<Snipped quote by Keyguyperson>
Yeah, in retrospect it's clear it was a joke. I suppose I'm just a bit on edge. I feel bit responsible for the recent drama, so I took it in the worst possible manner.

Doesn't help that I'm somewhat insecure about my lack of understanding of physics beyond the simple stuff. An insecurity that I cannot correct because I am somewhat hopeless with the subject of math...

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>

Welcome to the club. I wanted to be an aerospace engineer once, guess who's considering majoring in Pol Sci?

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>

Welcome to the club. I wanted to be an aerospace engineer once, guess who's considering majoring in Pol Sci?

@Ophidian I'm horrible at math too, but a basic understanding of Physics (at least my levels of it) doesn't really need math, you just need a specific mindset and the fact you're a huge fucking nerd who loves reading real and fictional technical documents.

@OphidianWell, understanding concepts from physics or at least the layman explanations of them shouldn't require any math skills, rest easy.
As for vacuum energy missiles they can be your rarely used doomsday warheads. I mean with sufficient butchering of physics you can say that vacuum energy generation creates unstable exotic particles which might have effects so harmful it makes radiation fallout look like Disneyland.

As for tech how about having a "vacuum cell" in the warhead with finely controlled environment to momentarily harness this power into a massively powerful explosive device? They would be also fail-safe because it requires a specific activation and thus it won't blow up your ship upon damage or destruction.

After years of research, Soviet scientists figured out their main rocket scientist actually lied about the range of rockets. Despite kidnapping Von Braun, it never occured to the Soviets that he was anything but honest to the day Captain Rocket rescued him and his family. Soon, and despite a high mortality rate, Soviet rocket scientists were creating and testing new rockets, and then missiles, all with much greater range and speed, until they were the second to none in expertise. The Soviets still have the edge in rocketry, and the Allies are reminded of this daily.

The height of Soviet rocketry was the ICBM (Inter-City Bombarding Missile), which had the potential range of over 400 kilometres, an astonishing figure for an atmospheric flight. Though impressed by this, the Red Army noted that they had nothing to arm it with. A simple high explosive warhead would at most destroy a single building, and gas warfare was banned by the Politiburo. In typical Soviet straightforwardness, several professors of relative expertise (such as atomic chemistry and theoretical physics) were locked in a large room stocked only with books about large explosions, blackboards, and a year's supply of food and water. They were promised to only be let out once they came up with a warhead of suitable destructive power.

Months later, they had an answer. Inspired by accounts of vacuum bubbles in water mains bursting and collapsing entire city blocks, the scientists put forward that the best suggestion would not be an explosion, but an implosion. Moved from the large room to a (locked) facility with the most advanced laboratory equipment in the Union, the scientists used their notes to create a Perfect Vacuum, thought impossible by Allied scientists except between atoms in lesser vacuums. A Perfect Vacuum is, literally, the absence of anything; even in outer space, there is a thin interstellar medium in the vacuum. A test in Siberia resulted in the entire taiga, from trees to soil, sucked towards the centre of the vacuum, leaving only a large crater and a superdense core of fused material. Needless to say, the Soviets had their warhead.

<Snipped quote by LHG100>
*Carefully hides Colonial Marines Technical Manuel*

*And his Star Wars Essential Guides*

I have no idea what you're talking about.

<Snipped quote by LHG100>
*Carefully hides Colonial Marines Technical Manuel*

*And his Star Wars Essential Guides*

I have no idea what you're talking about.

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>

I love those books

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>

I love those books

Why yes. Those warheads are more primitive then those fielded by the Federation and the Universal Union. Perhaps even inferior to them in most aspects.

My own agents will have their work cut out for them, uplifting all you primitives.

My own agents will have their work cut out for them, uplifting all you primitives.

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>Don't worry, Federation Starfleet doesn't have that many ships. Expect one or a couple of starships fighting your massive fleet. Generally the security of a system can be guaranteed by one decently equipped starship alone.
I am kinda going with TOS Star Trek's interpretation of how starships were used.
Think of star systems as countries and a starship as a nuclear aircraft carrier. One coasting close to your waters is usually scary enough.

<Snipped quote by Willy Vereb>

Well in fairness. This means you have Picard.

His speeches are a weapon unto themselves.

For clarity, though. Federation don't rely too much on vacuum energy generation. It's kind of free energy but only until you add the various technical issues with it. At least for the Federation.
They rather prefer their Conversion Reactors which are basically the holy grail of nuclear power to harness energy from nearly any material in a clean, safe and efficient way.
These are safe enough you can put them in a electric toothbrush and never worry about the fact you put a nuclear reactor right next to your open mouth.

<Snipped quote by Ophidian>No, I have Kirk. The rest of your comment also makes more sense with that.