<Snipped quote by Andreyich>
Eh, I kinda felt like it was weak. But isn't it still speculation? I wouldn't think anarchists would be organized enough to create a referendum, I think they would focus on a larger area than Catalonia, and I also think they'd be confident enough to outright say that is what they are. Plus if Catalonia devolved into anarchy, it would get put down very quickly.

<Snipped quote by Andreyich>
<Snipped quote by Andreyich>
Are you implying that President Carles Puigdemont is an anarchist, and the Parliament of Catalonia is full of other anarchists? Because they're the ones that led the referendum. If so, I'd love to see your evidence for that claim.

I'm thinking the anarchist movement in Catalonia is like the Neo-Nazi movement in the conservative party. Is it there? Yes. Is it the main body of them? No.

Actually, yes, I have.

That is quite loose, though oddly enough I'm more comfortable with that. Either way, yes, I'd say it's not exactly Nobel worthy. It's almost as bad as when they gave Obama one for no other reason than it was the progressive choice.

Thanks for correcting me, but Popular Unity Candidacy isn't exactly a big party, and you've yet to provide evidence that President Puigdemont is an anarchist, or that a vast segment of the Parliament of Catalonia supports violent anarchism. As it stands, CUP only makes up around 14% of the pro-independence side, and 8% of the Parliament. Is that enough to deem the pro-independents and Parliament pro-anarchist?

I already showed you that Congressman Joan Tardàis decried the vandalism that was purportedly done by anarchists, and he even stated that people may try to link the vandalism to the independence movement. While I agree that Popular Unity Candidacy may be pro-anarchist, you've yet to provide hard evidence that President Carles Puigdemont or the majority of Catalonia's Parliament are pro-anarchist. Until you do that, my premise that they're just democratic separatists still stands, because they're the ones that initiated the referendum.

I mean, if you're just shitting on a bunch of anarchists, that's a different story. If so, you should withdraw your implication that the President and majority of Parliament are on their side.

That assumes Assemblywoman Boya is actually an apologetic. If she is, which has yet to be proven, it's more like a 7v1, because Tardàis and Boya are the spokespeople for their respective parties.

Here's what I said:

You mean democratic separatists.

You're implying that Puigdemont and the Parliament are anarchists, simply because they didn't decry them, so I pointed out that Tardàis did just that. You then corrected my inaccurate statement that Boya also decried them, but her words didn't explicitly condone the vandalism.

Basically, your point can be summarized as an argument from ignorance, which is a fallacy.