Oh man Valkyrie Profile was fun, I think it's on mobile now, too. Second one was fun, shame they didn't continue with it though I think there's a mobile game coming out for it.
Oh man Valkyrie Profile was fun, I think it's on mobile now, too. Second one was fun, shame they didn't continue with it though I think there's a mobile game coming out for it.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
>says this is a thread for people to shit on and defend games
>tells someone to move elsewhere for defending a game
<Snipped quote by Mara>
Wrong, I said that if he doesn't like people criticizing games he should find a new thread cause thats what we do here.
<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>
Isn't the whole point of defending a game being that you dislike the other side criticising it? i know i sure wouldn't defend something that i was fine with people critiquing.
Battlefield stopped being good after 3 don't @ me.
<Snipped quote by Superboy>
Some might say after 2.
And some people might be wrong.
I think I clocked in like two or three hundred hours into Bafflefield 3 when I was a younggen. I didn’t have money to buy more than one video game, so I just sat on BF3 on my shitty internet connection.
I literally had to drag my modem into my bedroom so that I could get it to at least run.
<Snipped quote by Superboy>
BF3 was a big disappointment for me, but yeah I'll give you that it was at least in the spirit of the preceding games and a little bit of fun.
I can see how it would be. BF3 was around the time I really remember the series taking a turn away from grittier, more teamwork oriented gameplay to being scuffed Call of Duty with vehicles. They started marketing their games based on trick shot montages and level destruction events...which don’t feel at all like Battlefield should.
<Snipped quote by Superboy>
I don't mind the level destruction, but yeah they really did gut the mechanics and start minimizing the classes. The days of playing Commander were over by the time BF3 came out and the tactical "meta" so to speak entirely changed. The newer games run "smoother" and they look pretty, I guess, but they really don't have the teeth to be considered a pure Battlefield experience.
Me pointing out the fact that Gowi wants to be a mod isn't an ad-hominem either. A lot of this boils down to dishing out what you cant take.
One of my favorite parts of playing a Bafflefield game was that feeling of combined arms combat. Infantry running alongside armor, getting air support from jets and helicopters? Super dope. The squad gameplay was great, too, because it felt like I was actually contributing something. Like we actually needed four people of each class for the whole to be effective.
And now it's a giant deathmatch game where the classes don't matter and it's all about running and gunning.
Don't get me wrong: Call of Duty's a great series too, and one of the most successful for a reason. But Battlefield never was- and never should be- Call of Duty.
<Snipped quote by Superboy>
Call of Duty has been ripping off Medal of Honor for a long time and doing well. Battlefield has always run opposite to that style... but I guess the "EA ruins everything" meme is what it is. Closest thing to Battlefield 2 nowadays is Rising Storm and ARMA, unfortunately.
They ripped off Medal of Honor so hard that I wouldn't be surprised if it came full circle and Medal of Honor was accused of trying to be Call of Duty in the distant future.
<Snipped quote by Superboy>
Already happened, bud.
Eight years ago at that.
Can you stop trying to troll people by constantly repeating an often false statement. I've been getting DM's about it, please try not to do that.