You can give me reasons why you came to a wrong conclusion about what I thought about the game, and thats fine. But it was still wrong. The adjectives I used are not the same as yours, as much as you like trying to draw a character assesment from my other posts you are never going to know what I mean unless you ask me. If you dont want to ask me then fine, but you're gonna be wrong.

@Dynamo FrokaneWhether she was talking about/to you or not has nothing to do with my point. My point is what you said was hypocritical. Nice strawman though ;)

If I say game is alright, then follow up by saying its polished and of a decent quality but still undeserving of its hype, then dont tell me I think it sucks that'll look stupid.

@Dynamo FrokaneWhat? How is it? You couldn't answer my point of being a hypocrite so you decided to bring up a whole other point that isn't related to what I said xD

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

Yeah maybe if you fucking did that

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Hello this is the tone police, stop being weirdly aggressive, thanks.

And I DID do that, first thing I said was that it was 'alright', if you interpreted that as 'it sucks and its for babies' then my video game opinions really arent the problem.

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

Go fuck yourself.

<Snipped quote>

No you didn't you disingenuous motherfucker. Not until well later.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Be nice, swearing at me like that is going to get thread locked.
I didnt swear at you.

And the VERY FIRST post in this discussion was me saying:

'It's alright, not mind-blowing'.

Thats not 'until well later' it was the beginning, good lord.

If I say game is alright, then follow up by saying its polished and of a decent quality but still undeserving of its hype, then dont tell me I think it sucks that'll look stupid.

@Dynamo FrokaneAll I'm saying is the language you used.

"One might think" is the same as "one might assume", and it's kind of ironic that you would spout out on how this is a place for writers, then point out how someone said that, and then said the same thing. I'm not making a comment on the substance on what was said, merely just how it was said

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

You know damn well that THIS:

<Snipped quote>

Is not at all what happened.

You said "It's alright, nothing mind-blowing" and then the 'discussion' over fucking adjectives and metrics and nonsense happened and only then did you have anything close to a 'follow up'.

Not ONCE did I tell you that you thought it sucked, and you got all super defensive just because you 'weren't asked' to elaborate on your 'alright, not mind blowing' statement. Instead of doing a followup you went off. It's disingenuous.

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

When you came with that ridiculous 'it sucks and its for babies' quote I'm making the point thats stupid even to use as an intentional exageration. When my very first comment on the game was 'alright' which is completely in step with me saying the game is probably going to be overrated and that the hype was unwarranted.

I only had to follow up with the game was of quality and polished because you wrongly assumed that me not ranking it as mind-blowing disqualified the game from that.

Nothing disengenous about it.

whats with people being so upset about minor shit

I just think people don't wanna see an IP they love be mixed in with the bad rep of a mobile game. Also, when you have to say "Do you guys not have phones?" As your follow up to the poor reaction, you know you're in for a bad time