Video Games: The General Discussion & Community Thread

[Fabricant451]

You can give me reasons why you came to a wrong conclusion about what I thought about the game, and thats fine. But it was still wrong. The adjectives I used are not the same as yours, as much as you like trying to draw a character assesment from my other posts you are never going to know what I mean unless you ask me. If you dont want to ask me then fine, but you're gonna be wrong.

@Dynamo Frokane

Sorry I came to the 'wrong' conclusion of "Dynamo Frokane, noted shitposter and weirdly aggressive fisherperson, doesn't much care for the big popular game after noted instances where said person was preemptively dumping on the game due to using language that was tepid at best" just because I didn't do something as clearly obvious as asking you to expand on your opinion and have a conversation instead of once again having a hissy fit because someone came to a reasonable assumption about your thoughts on a video game. In the future when you say something like "Big popular game sucks and is for babies" I'll be sure to ask you what you mean by that instead of assuming you think it sucks.

[Dolerman]

@Dynamo FrokaneWhether she was talking about/to you or not has nothing to do with my point. My point is what you said was hypocritical. Nice strawman though ;)

@GingerBoi123

Your use of strawman is incorrect. I'm not debating you. I'm asking you to provide me an answer, if you cant provide it then fine. Dont know what else to tell ya.

[Dolerman]

@Fabricant451

I already told you Im not fishing just because I dont expand on all my criticisms. You calling me aggressive for confirming my postions isnt going to stop me from correcting you where you're wrong, sorry.

If I say big popular game sucks and its for babies, be sure to call me out for saying it sucks and its for babies.

If I say game is alright, then follow up by saying its polished and of a decent quality but still undeserving of its hype, then dont tell me I think it sucks that'll look stupid.

[GingerBoi123]

@Dynamo FrokaneWhat? How is it? You couldn't answer my point of being a hypocrite so you decided to bring up a whole other point that isn't related to what I said xD

[Fabricant451]

If I say game is alright, then follow up by saying its polished and of a decent quality but still undeserving of its hype, then dont tell me I think it sucks that'll look stupid.

@Dynamo Frokane

Yeah maybe if you fucking did that we wouldn't have had a page dedicated to you not fucking doing that.

[Dolerman]

@Dynamo FrokaneWhat? How is it? You couldn't answer my point of being a hypocrite so you decided to bring up a whole other point that isn't related to what I said xD

@GingerBoi123

But I wasnt making an assumption about her talking to/about me. She WAS talking to me/about me. If you can make a reasonable case that she wasnt then I'll take it back. But you can't, which seems to highlight that even you think she was talking about/to me.

[Dolerman]

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

Yeah maybe if you fucking did that

@Fabricant451

Hello this is the tone police, stop being weirdly aggressive, thanks.

And I DID do that, first thing I said was that it was 'alright', if you interpreted that as 'it sucks and its for babies' then my video game opinions really arent the problem.

[Fabricant451]

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Hello this is the tone police, stop being weirdly aggressive, thanks.

@Dynamo Frokane

Go fuck yourself.

And I DID do that, first thing I said was that it was 'alright', if you interpreted that as 'it sucks and its for babies' then my video game opinions really arent the problem.

No you didn't you disingenuous motherfucker. Not until well later.

[Dolerman]

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

Go fuck yourself.

<Snipped quote>

No you didn't you disingenuous motherfucker. Not until well later.

@Fabricant451

Be nice, swearing at me like that is going to get thread locked.
I didnt swear at you.

And the VERY FIRST post in this discussion was me saying:

'It's alright, not mind-blowing'.

Thats not 'until well later' it was the beginning, good lord.

[GingerBoi123]

@Dynamo FrokaneAll I'm saying is the language you used.

"One might think" is the same as "one might assume", and it's kind of ironic that you would spout out on how this is a place for writers, then point out how someone said that, and then said the same thing. I'm not making a comment on the substance on what was said, merely just how it was said

[Fabricant451]

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

Be nice, swearing at me like that is going to get thread locked.
I didnt swear at you.

And the VERY FIRST post in this discussion was me saying:

'It's alright, not mind-blowing'.

Thats not 'until well later' it was the beginning, good lord.

@Dynamo Frokane

You know damn well that THIS:

If I say game is alright, then follow up by saying its polished and of a decent quality but still undeserving of its hype, then dont tell me I think it sucks that'll look stupid.

Is not at all what happened.

You said "It's alright, nothing mind-blowing" and then the 'discussion' over fucking adjectives and metrics and nonsense happened and only then did you have anything close to a 'follow up'.

Not ONCE did I tell you that you thought it sucked, and you got all super defensive just because you 'weren't asked' to elaborate on your 'alright, not mind blowing' statement. Instead of doing a followup you went off. It's disingenuous.

[Dolerman]

@Dynamo FrokaneAll I'm saying is the language you used.

"One might think" is the same as "one might assume", and it's kind of ironic that you would spout out on how this is a place for writers, then point out how someone said that, and then said the same thing. I'm not making a comment on the substance on what was said, merely just how it was said

@GingerBoi123

Oh but thats a different sentence. I was referring to when she said:

"Its a wonder you play anything"

That was directed at me.

The "One might think", is more ambigious I agree.

[Dolerman]

<Snipped quote by Dynamo Frokane>

You know damn well that THIS:

<Snipped quote>

Is not at all what happened.

You said "It's alright, nothing mind-blowing" and then the 'discussion' over fucking adjectives and metrics and nonsense happened and only then did you have anything close to a 'follow up'.

Not ONCE did I tell you that you thought it sucked, and you got all super defensive just because you 'weren't asked' to elaborate on your 'alright, not mind blowing' statement. Instead of doing a followup you went off. It's disingenuous.

@Fabricant451

When you came with that ridiculous 'it sucks and its for babies' quote I'm making the point thats stupid even to use as an intentional exageration. When my very first comment on the game was 'alright' which is completely in step with me saying the game is probably going to be overrated and that the hype was unwarranted.

I only had to follow up with the game was of quality and polished because you wrongly assumed that me not ranking it as mind-blowing disqualified the game from that.

Nothing disengenous about it.

[Fabricant451]

<Snipped quote by Fabricant451>

When you came with that ridiculous 'it sucks and its for babies' quote I'm making the point thats stupid even to use as an intentional exageration. When my very first comment on the game was 'alright' which is completely in step with me saying the game is probably going to be overrated and that the hype was unwarranted.

@Dynamo Frokane

The point of exaggeration is to make something sound more outlandish than the actuality. It's well within rights to use that exaggerated example.

I only had to follow up with the game was of quality and polished because you wrongly assumed that me not ranking it as mind-blowing disqualified the game from that.

Nothing disengenous about it.

Now you're assuming something that isn't true. Funny, that.

[Hey Im Jordan]

soul calibur 6 got fixed

who friday night fight night @here

[OwO]

whats with people being so upset about minor shit

just because activizzard releases a mobile diablo don't mean they ain't working on a new mainline diablo title for the future

people being mad about tiny changes

me constantly being mad about having to dredge through hundreds of posts of complaints just so i can actually see some cool content i like

i miss being genuinely excited about every game coming out, even the crappy looking ones

i miss enjoying shityy games with a niche community without havimg everyone spew out hate for the dumb things i like

i miss living under a rock

[Fabricant451]

Heckling vaudeville shows in the cowboy game is a pleasure I didn't know I needed.

Also the gold bar dupe has yet to be patched so I've ruined the economy in that game for myself but whatever, being able to be the most fanciful ass outlaw is my aesthetic.

whats with people being so upset about minor shit

@Burger

Hello and welcome to the internet, dear friend.

[GingerBoi123]

I just think people don't wanna see an IP they love be mixed in with the bad rep of a mobile game. Also, when you have to say "Do you guys not have phones?" As your follow up to the poor reaction, you know you're in for a bad time

[Fabricant451]

I just think people don't wanna see an IP they love be mixed in with the bad rep of a mobile game. Also, when you have to say "Do you guys not have phones?" As your follow up to the poor reaction, you know you're in for a bad time

@GingerBoi123

While this is a valid point, many gamers are unable to see anything other than the immediate so the idea that something like Diablo: Immortal even exists says to them "Diablo 4 is not happening ever, the franchise is dead" rather than the more sensible idea of "This game isn't for me, I still have Diablo 2/3 and know that they're probably still working on a Diablo 4."

[GingerBoi123]

@Fabricant451Yeah, I just think it's killed anticipation for a possible sequel. Like "This? This is meant to tide us over until a fourth game?". I think it's shit either way but I've never played Diablo... So...