Configuration is interchangeable and customizable. And I really would prefer no AT-AT's just some more fighters.
Cale Tucker said
Configuration is interchangeable and customizable. And I really would prefer no AT-AT's just some more fighters.
Charter said
If there are any issues that are lore related, please let me know.
Sep said
Loooks goodddd.One thing, and this is really pernickity. In Star Wars the closest you get to coffee is caf :P
Sep said
No idea about that but books always call it caf.
Sep said
Well that doesn't work. AT-ATs don't sit in the main hanger beside the Fighters. If we get into more space combat style stuff down the line I'll let you modify your ships compliment. For now... it's not my main concern :P
Cale Tucker said
Wait, what? When did I say the at-st's beside fighters? I don't have AT-AT'S. If you let me have them, I'll just send them to the planet and kill the enemies.
Sep said
Because you can't just "Swap out" AT-AT space to add additional fighters. An AT-AT hanger isn't designed to take TIE fighters and vice versa. Getting rid of the AT-ATs from the compliment just means no AT-ATs :P
Cale Tucker said
Actually it can be configured to be. TIE fighters are stored on "Hangars," like, hung from a suspension, they can be put in there as storage. Plus, where the AT-AT is located has a lower hangar door to be released from. Though it can not be used as an actual hangar, they can still be stored inside. If you are not fond of this idea, I will just have the area converted into factories for armor and weapons. I already had other places reconfigured for that, but eh.
Cale Tucker said
It sorta matters for my plan, but okay.