[OOC] Over

[Ryver et Rhine]

Just a future fyi, @yoshua171 can you please PM both Xodus and I instead of just Xodus? It makes it harder for us to discuss with only one of us reading the PM. Thanks! :)

Edit: This is a message for everyone too. If you want to contact us, please PM both Xodus and me rather than one or the other.

[yoshua171]

Noted, sorry about that.

P.S. Made a new PM with you in it ^_^

[Ryver et Rhine]

Thanks a lot! :) I've replied.

Also, woot, Caleira is inside too. <3

[Ryver et Rhine]

@Seeker Any updates re your post? I've only heard from Kirra so far about hers.

Announcements:

1st: Xodus shall post either tomorrow or the day after.

2nd: Rules regarding character creation and NPC creation have been added to the updated OOC.

3rd: I'll be adding the section shown below to the updated OOC first page. As there was a rule that partners can't have consecutive Asylum Codes, =( I'm sorry Baku, you'll have edit either Renault's or Elliot's. Xodus and I missed that earlier when reviewing your CS.

Preview (feedback will be appreciated)

Extra Information on Asylum Codes

Selecting an Asylum Code:

• Do not take any number listed below because they belong to someone's character
• Partners should not have consecutive numbers, because that is ultra rare
• Even NPC Asylums should have their own unique Asylum Code
• Use this site to help you craft your number, if needed

0-XII (Reserved for Chronos/GM & Co GM): IV (6, Reri)

XIII-XX (13-21): XIII (13, Angel), XIX (19, Omari)

XXI-XXX (21-30): XXI (21, Kiara), XXIV (24, Renault)

XXXI-XL (31-40): XL (40, AJ)

XLI-L (41-50): LXIV (44, Elliot)

LI-LX (51-60): LII (52, Maeve), LIV (54, Cameron), LV (55, Alistair), LX (60, Vali)

LXI-LXX (61-70): LXVI (66, Hester), LXIX (69, Geko)

LXXI-LXXX (71-80): LXXVII (77, Velva)

LXXXI and Above (81 and above): CX (110, Keith), CXXIII (123, Sparks), CCXII (212, Bits)

4th: The updated OOC is being reviewed before we put it up. The coding is 90% finished.

[bakugou]

3rd: I'll be adding the section shown below to the updated OOC first page. As there was a rule that partners can't have consecutive Asylum Codes, =( I'm sorry Baku, you'll have edit either Renault's or Elliot's. Xodus and I missed that earlier when reviewing your CS.

@Ryver et Rhine

Sorry about that! I changed Elliot's to LXIV (44). Hope that's okay!

[Ryver et Rhine]

That works great =D

[Rtron]

Every asylum gets their unique number right?

So does that mean there's some Asylum walking around with his number from his ear down to his hand? Or just covering her back? XD

[xodus]

Maybe =p It is up to the Asylum where and how they want their code to appear. I mean Reri has it on the side of her neck =p

Also nice posts everyone, I see you all have been enjoying yourselves making out and what not. Joux will soon give you kids a lesson in whoop ass with his prosthetic foot. >.>

[Ryver et Rhine]

Haha .... Bahhh :P You had the fake leg idea too. </3 I bet mine is just as awesome.

[Rtron]

Also nice posts everyone, I see you all have been enjoying yourselves making out and what not. Joux will soon give you kids a lesson in whoop ass with his prosthetic foot. >.>

@xodus

Is he that jealous of Kiara winning the argument and then just leaving? :p

[shylarah]

@Rtron I think he is. I wouldn't be at all surprised.

And yes, Vaelieve is a thing. I don't ship, and I ship it. ^.~

[Ryver et Rhine]

~_~ We can't put up videos on RPG, can we?

[yoshua171]

You can if they're youtube videos I do believe.

[bakugou]

Finally finished Renault's post! Not my best work, but at least it's done.

[xodus]

Nice post Renault and Shy =D I am loving how you guys are putting your own distinct views about what Joux said. The views of youths optimism and satire, well done.

[Rumplestiltskin]

What's taking so long to get the updated OOC page up, Ryver, Xodus? =o~

Also, alch-spec idea: Spatial Reposition

The ability of temporarily manipulating the arrangement of things' locations. For example, Item A, B, and C being swapped instantaneously. Once the alchemy leaves, they go back to their locations. It would pertain to small objects, handhelds, weapons, etc. Not people. And you would always have to have at least one of the items to offer up to swap another distant item's place.

What do you all think? =)~

Didn't want to expand too far into it, I'm just pitching it here. Thanks for the feedback!

[shylarah]

@Rumplestiltskin I think it sounds okay. Objects would need to be about the same size, and within sight. It seems like a special extension of teleportation for things other than one's self, to me. I know I discussed that with Ryver or Xodus, but I forget the details. Having them switch back is interesting, but I don't see it as necessary since teleportation is a thing. Switching with nothing (or just air) is possible, since teleportation does not currently create a loud bang from the implosion or displacement of air. Also there's probably an eventual size limit -- a building is probably a lvl 2 swap, for example.

[Rumplestiltskin]

Actually teleportation does create a displacement of air. >_> Or it should anyway.

Hmm, thank you. I'll keep those points in mind. And the means to let items go back to where they were allows for extra tactics. But it could optional perhaps.

Anyone else?

[shylarah]

@Rumplestiltskin I know it should, but I've only seen ONE fictional work that has that actually happen in a noticeable manner -- teleportation creates an audible pop for small items or a loud bang for something the size of a person, and a small gust of air.

Aslo when I say proportional, size is probably the deciding factor, but I think mass should play a role too.

[Rumplestiltskin]

Alright. Well, what if the items moved at high speeds instead of being teleported? That's doable, isn't it?