Would anyone be opposed to my posting yet?
@Polybius
I think my nation might stop supporting the Unity Accords first. They don't like anyone there so they might leave the U.A fairly quickly without anything bad really happening.
@Polybius Will do. Tonight I won't sleep too much but I'll have it done :)
<Snipped quote by Polybius>
My view on the matter would be that directly opposing the Unity Accords would appear to many nations as an excessive risk while the threat of the Mandate still exists - fragmenting might leave them vulnerable, after all. However, if strong dissensions arise in the Council, the possibility of an organised schism occurring at some point would not seem to me to be unlikely as the memory of the war grows more distant and nations gain more confidence. Then again, disagreements may stem from the current situation as well - for instance, the Palathyn Collective being, as we see, in favour of combating the Golgotha with more radical methods, which the UA are against.
I know this'll be denied but id pitch it anyway.
It seems like the majority of the nrp is focused on a NATO coalition of sorts. Would it be cool if I made a nation capable of taking it on? Sortof the nrp's soviet union for lack of better terms.
Most of you probably don't know me but I'm a fair player, I don't war for the sake of war and only play for story. My initial plot arc was that nation reaching out to be peaceful, be part of the community per se'
That role has already fallen to the two Golgotha players. Honestly, what we need is more Unity Accord members.