[OOC] Yu-Gi-Oh Soul R (Still Accepting)

[Eklispe]

Fair enough.

[BayRat]

Your new dragon-themed edgelord is here

Name: Drake Sigurd

Sex: M

Age: 18

House: Neos House

Appearance:

Duel Disk: Overall layout of the more traditional model, but the design is a brown and its borders are detailed like rocks, the longer end has a dragon's head.

Personality:Just your typical Edgelord. Drake is an too-serious and brooding figure who's motivations are to get stronger and to beat anyone in his way. Rarely does he ever smile, and comradeship is valued little in his eyes. Sure he won't mind being in the presence of others but he is quick to get annoyed and prefers to do things by himself. Even when angry, his emotions are much more controlled and rather then simply yelling he simply gets a more abrasive tone.

History: While its true no one is born to be such a brooding figure, Drake's persona gradually shifted from a typical young toddler to an edgelord over the course of his early life. By the time he entered the preteen phase of 13 he was already your typical angsty kid filled with edge. That doesn't mean he dressed like a scene kid or was over the top in anyway, but rather his pessimism and rude behavior simply fostered from his own growing emotion. He doesn't have a tragic backstory, he grew up in a somewhat wealthy family in the U.S. without any family or school issues. No bullies, no abuse, just a typical kid that never grew out of that one phase. His passion for dueling came when in middle school when other kids introduced the game to him. While he grew satisfaction from quickly learning how to beat his acquaintances, abusing his families wealth to get better cards then the rest and enjoyed the bullying behavior of belittling the other kids that couldn't beat him, there was a more hidden interest to the game's lore. Every card has a story, a story that remains hidden. The more he dueled, the more he became fond of the dragon monster type and one card in particular, Tyrant Dragon, the strongest monster in his deck at that time.

Wish: To be the strongest duelist and learn of the origins of Tyrant Dragon.

Deck:

Custom cards

Future Fixes: (For tributing monsters, it should be just the hand instead of both)(The first effect is not required for its activation, you just need to target a Tyrant Dragon on the field to equip, I'll reword this card when I have the time.)
(will remove the unequip to save the monster effect.)

Solar Legacy)

need to reword the attack ability two "a second attack" Implying it can only make a single additional attack after the first, just like the original Tyrant Dragon.
Will only be considered as Tyrant Dragon on the field or graveyard.
Will change the trap immunity to "Cannot be targeted by spell cards your opponent controls" And will replace the second attack ability with "Your opponent cannot activate cards or effects in response to the summon of this card."

(Three Tyrant Dragon's, not dragon tyrant's.)
Treated as Tyrant Dragon while on the field or graveyard, will loose the attack gain bonus but will keep the rest of its abilities including the repeat attack and trap immunity.

Main Deck: 45

x2 Tyrant Dragon
x3 Tyrant Dragon Overlord**
x3 Tail Spear of the Tyrant Dragon**
x2 Divine Dragon Lord Felgrand
x1 Wingbeat of the Giant Dragon
x2 Paladin of felgrand
x2 Dragon Knight of Creation
x2 Arkbrave Dragon
x2 Return of the Dragon Lords
x3 Ruins of the Divine Dragon Lords
x1 Tiger Dragon
x1 Strong Wind Dragon
x2 Overwhelm
x2 Dragon's Mirror
x3 Keeper of the shrine
x2 Totem Dragon
x2 Stamping Destruction
x1 Prime material dragon
x3 hardened Armor Dragon
x2 double summon
x2 Dragon Ravine
x2 Pot of greed
x1 Graceful Charity

Extra Deck 2
x1 Supreme Dragon Tyrant**
x1 Five-Headed Dragon

[Eklispe]

Generally to link images you have to right click image -> open in new tab -> copy paste that url.

[BayRat]

@Eklispe Should be fixed now.

[Eklispe]

@dragonmancer Your fusion card uses "Dragon Tyrant", I assume it should use "Tyrant Dragon", nitpicking ftw ^.^

[BayRat]

@dragonmancer Your fusion card uses "Dragon Tyrant", I assume it should use "Tyrant Dragon", nitpicking ftw ^.^

@Eklispe

Oops, thats a mistake

[Eklispe]

Also the equip spell I believe is written as a mandatory effect, which is presumably not your intent.

Personal question: Is Tyrant Dragon Overlord's extra attack once per turn?

[BayRat]

@Eklispe I forgot to add once per turn for Overlord, just like the original tyrant dragon. The only Tyrant dragon that is able to attack more then twice from its ability is supreme

[Scarifar]

@dragonmancer

Few things:
First, cards whose names are always treated as the same name as another card, regardless of what they are, will limit the number of cards with that name to 3. Examples are Polymerization and Fusion Substitute as well as Umi and A Legendary Ocean. So, you can't have more than a total of 3 Tyrant Dragon and Tyrant Dragon Overlord cards. I'm not actually sure about Supreme Dragon Tyrant on this regard since it's not in the Main Deck, but I would assume the same restriction applies. Perhaps have "This card's name becomes 'Tyrant Dragon' while it is on the field or in the Graveyard" instead if you really want to keep it the way you want it.

Second, Tail Spear of the Tyrant Dragon is a little awkward. You don't need to have the initial clause "This card is always treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell card" if the words "Tyrant Dragon" are already in its name. You also have "If you control no monsters" as a requirement, yet you allow "tributing dragon-type monsters from both your side of the field" in it. A useless effect there. You also don't need "you may unequip and destroy this card instead", just put "you can destroy this card instead" since it'll be unequipped automatically when it's destroyed, y'know? Heck, I'm not even sure that effect should be there at all, considering you already have 1000 ATK and piercing.

Third: Tyrant Dragon Overlord. You get to summon this card using monsters from your graveyard, and by doing so search out a card from your deck. Furthermore, it's immune to all traps. It's just a straight upgrade from the original Tyrant Dragon, and that's not exactly something you should want, nor would it even make sense to reduce the original Tyrant Dragon to being fusion material fodder. It should definitely be nerfed, or even altered to have a different effect from the original Tyrant Dragon and therefore giving both a good reason to be around.

Fourth: Supreme Dragon Tyrant. The "Dragon's Mirror" effect is rather unnecessary, so that should be removed, imo. The 3900 ATK seems too high to include a "gain 400 ATK" as well, and you already have Trap and Monster effect immunity on it. Why does it even have Monster effect immunity, anyway? Trap immunity is enough. At the very least, you should choose the 400 ATK increase or Trap immunity. It wouldn't be fair to have both.

[KOgaming]

@mattmanganon

You didn't change much at all of your character sheet did you? I thought you said you were going to play Nordics?

@dragonmancer

Dragons aren't an archetype.

The wording on your cards in general is a bit off-standard, so I'd like you to look at some of the actual cards in the game to make it more streamlined.

If Tyrant Dragon Overlord is treated as Tyrant Dragon always, it means they count as the same card. Meaning if you have 3 overlords, you can't have Tyrant Dragon (because you already have the maximum 3, technically)- same as the NEX fusion monsters.

A Solar Legacy isn't necessarily a strong monster rather than it is your ace monster. It's a card that evolves rather than being something that is already incredibly strong. I think in this case, Overlord should be your character's Solar Legacy instead of Supreme. Also, Supreme TD either has too low level or too high attack. I think its attack, effects, and summoning condition should let it be at least level 12 like BEUD.

EDIT: Is everyone wrapped up? If so, I'll move the story along.

[Eklispe]

I'm ready to move on.

[BayRat]

@mattmanganon

You didn't change much at all of your character sheet did you? I thought you said you were going to play Nordics?

@dragonmancer

Dragons aren't an archetype.

The wording on your cards in general is a bit off-standard, so I'd like you to look at some of the actual cards in the game to make it more streamlined.

If Tyrant Dragon Overlord is treated as Tyrant Dragon always, it means they count as the same card. Meaning if you have 3 overlords, you can't have Tyrant Dragon (because you already have the maximum 3, technically)- same as the NEX fusion monsters.

A Solar Legacy isn't necessarily a strong monster rather than it is your ace monster. It's a card that evolves rather than being something that is already incredibly strong. I think in this case, Overlord should be your character's Solar Legacy instead of Supreme. Also, Supreme TD either has too low level or too high attack. I think its attack, effects, and summoning condition should let it be at least level 12 like BEUD.

EDIT: Is everyone wrapped up? If so, I'll move the story along.

@KOgaming

I'll fix the wording in a little bit I'm just going to leave notes under the cards to clear some mistypes and whatnot. For now I will take the advice and switch the Solar legacy to overlord instead of Supreme.

[Blight Bug]

Let's roll.

[SillyPhilly]

@dragonmancer

Wow. Ok. Issues

#1: Because of your fusion monster's name clause you can't actually make it since you can only run a max. of 3 of each card in a deck. This can be solved with just havin it treated at Tyrant Dragon while on the field or in the grave.

#2:It's "attack again" effect is kind of busted. Change it to "attack another monster once again in a row" and put a once per turn clause on it.

#3:Tail Spear just doesn't work. For one you can't tribute summon from the graveyard.

#4. It's activation requires you to have no monsters but then it wants you to tribute monsters from both the field and hand. If you need to have an open field to use it then why have the option to tribute from the field?

#5: 1000 atk is kind of big, especially for a revival equip. Remove this.

#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."

#7: Not quite sure why it needs to be treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell when it already has Tyrant Dragon in the name.

#8: What do you mean "tributed from the graveyard"? Don't you mean banished?

#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.

#10: Once again, since this has a name clause you can't more than 3 of it. You are currently runnin' 6 Tyrant Dragons.

#11: A card that is unaffected by traps AND can attack multiple times AND is a casual plus 1 as soon as it comes out seems terribly broken. Pick 2 and scrap the third.

[Eklispe]

#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."

@SillyPhilly

To be fair for this one they could want it to work on effects that remove from the field. It would be a new effect and stupid considering the amount of power but there it is. Also you're... a little overbearing, given you're not the GM perhaps wording as suggestions or requests would be better :<

[Scarifar]

#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.

@SillyPhilly

Well, Pendulum Monsters are a thing, so maybe destroying by battle in general is fine.

[SillyPhilly]

Nah dude. Matchups should be a thing.

[BayRat]

@KOgaming
Fixed wordings
(will update the actual cards a bit later since I have to reupload them, and if any more changes are needed then uploading them now would be a bit of a waste.)

Tail Spear of the Tyrant Dragon

You may equip this card to a face-up Tyrant Dragon you control. This card cannot be equipped to any monsters other then Tyrant Dragon.

The equipped monster Gains 1000 ATK. If the equipped monster battles a defense position monster, inflict piercing damage to your opponent.

If you control no monsters, you may reveal this card from your hand, special summon one Dragon Tyrant from your graveyard, and if you do, attach this card to that monster.

Supreme Tyrant Dragon

"Tyrant Dragon" + "Tyrant Dragon" + "Tyrant Dragon"
(This card is treated as Tyrant Dragon While on the field and graveyard. If this card is on the field, it is treated as a tribute summoned monster.)
If this card was fusion summoned by the effects of "Dragon's Mirror", return all of your banished monsters to the main deck, and shuffle it.
Unaffected by your opponents trap and monster effects. If this card destroys a monster by battle, you may have this card attack again.

Tyrant Dragon Overlord

(This card is Treated as Tyrant Dragon in the hand, field, and graveyard.)
This card can be tribute summoned by tributing dragon-type monsters from your hand and/or banishing dragon-type monsters from your graveyard.

Your opponent cannot activate cards or effects in response to this card's summon.

This card cannot be targeted by your opponent's spell cards.

[KOgaming]

#1: Because of your fusion monster's name clause you can't actually make it since you can only run a max. of 3 of each card in a deck. This can be solved with just havin it treated at Tyrant Dragon while on the field or in the grave.

@SillyPhilly

This has been addressed like twice already. You don't need to say it again.

#2:It's "attack again" effect is kind of busted. Change it to "attack another monster once again in a row" and put a once per turn clause on it.

It's really not that big a deal. I might think about it, but for now I'm okay unless someone can make a good case for it not only for me but Mr. Dragonmancer.

#3:Tail Spear just doesn't work. For one you can't tribute summon from the graveyard.

The wording was a little confusing, but it doesn't say tribute from the graveyard, it says to the graveyard.

#4. It's activation requires you to have no monsters but then it wants you to tribute monsters from both the field and hand. If you need to have an open field to use it then why have the option to tribute from the field?

Again, bad wording. He's apparently doing an errata of it so that he tributes from the hand. I think he should say "special summon" instead of "tribute summon" too. I'm also pondering whether or not to change "tribute" to "send from hand to graveyard" so he can't exploit Hieratics.

#5: 1000 atk is kind of big, especially for a revival equip. Remove this.

Axe of Despair OP komoney pls nerf

#6: The wordin youre lookin for is "if the equipped monster would be destroyed, destroy this card instead."

He knows.

#7: Not quite sure why it needs to be treated as a Tyrant Dragon spell when it already has Tyrant Dragon in the name.

See above.

#8: What do you mean "tributed from the graveyard"? Don't you mean banished?

Djinns are "tributed" from the graveyard.

#9: It's effect that makes it attack again should require the destroyed monster to be sent to the graveyard.

Maybe, but it's not like he can just randomly tech Dark Law into the deck so it's not like that'll even matter. Again a problem of wording, which has been addressed.

#10: Once again, since this has a name clause you can't more than 3 of it. You are currently runnin' 6 Tyrant Dragons.

The horse has been dead for hours, yet you still continue to beat it. Why?

#11: A card that is unaffected by traps AND can attack multiple times AND is a casual plus 1 as soon as it comes out seems terribly broken. Pick 2 and scrap the third.

Supreme Tyrant Dragon requires three specific monster either on board or in the grave and a fourth card to fuse them all. As opposed to Kozmo shups or BECMD which are stronger and need less to summon.

Also please GM your own game. This one's mine's.

[SillyPhilly]

Tail Spear: Again, you actually can't tribute from the graveyard. Just have it use tributes from tge hand since the in hand cost would balance this out. Also 1000 atk plus piercing on what is effectively a revival card seems a little too strong and your monsters are big anyways.

Supreme Tyrant Dragon: Still needs a once per turn clause and have its attack restricted to only monsters. Better yet have it so it can only attack monsters.

Tyrant Dragon Overlord: The wording you want is "This card can be tribute summoned but tributing dragon-type monsters from your hand and/or banishing dragon-type monsters from your graveyard". Also summon protection is superbusted on card that is also protected from spell-based spot removal.

Edit: Was busy composin when you posted above. Sorry if I got preachy.