Unfortunately, I am torn between two (2) entries. Both entries made me re-read them several times. The first listed in my vote is an extremely engaging read. It grabbed me immediately and left me with a lot of awe and wonderment after it was finished. It is like lighting a candle and staring into a looking glass and then doubting (heh) what I am imagining through the meta-metaphorical journey on the electronic screen. I had to re-read it several times, and each read through was just as enjoyable if not more so as the first. In the same vein, after reading the contestant's comments on the entry, it heightened the story's value as a very effective utilization with what was given (especially time-wise). This entry was going to be my vote, but the second entry that I have listed started to grow on me more and more as I began pondering how to write the critiques. The reason it grew on me is because of the beginning and ending. They are strong and juvenile enough to elicit a further (more naive or innocent) contemplation of what is supposed to be happening or being provided to the audience. Admittedly, I re-read the entry several times in a vain attempt to decipher if the omitted letters spell anything. (If you wanna know why I have no reviews for all the entries iz bcuz Briza iz gunnuh Briza, like thank you
@Vocab for that, too.) I also started thinking about the Cowboy Bebop character Spike Spiegel and his cybernetic eye, with the mention of television & all that jazz. It has a lot of depth and thought and is eloquently written and formatted for the mature viewer that I could personally appreciate. Both tickle that part of the mind that makes me smile, in different but similar and all too familiarly amazing ways.
Hm, I guess that is kind of a review. Yay!
Anyways, with much ado about nothing more to say: