The only takeaway I think I care about besides those two would be future combat retcons and trying to avoid them if possible.
This makes total sense. We're all adults here and presumably understand the consequences of the actions we take in character, but I do want to offer a little leighway in the cases where a player may not fully grasp the implications of the action they're taking. If we were sitting across from each other at the table, I would do the same thing: "Are you sure you want to subject your teammates to splash damage?" I feel like the alternative feels like a "Gotcha" from the DM where I just announce the friendly fire.
As a rule, though, I heartily agree on there being as-little-to-no retcons during combat since we pick up the pace.
Like for instance, how much damage has been clocked on each target that we're aware of, if there are any active conditions in play, whatever damage resistances and immunities we have in play....
These are good notes. I can list how much damage enemies have taken beside their initiative order summary, as well as conditions there (like Saur being Dazzled).
Maybe even a very brief summary of the party's current plan of attack if one has been stated...
Hmm, on this point I'm less convinced. Saur's plan of attack may not be shared between the rest of the group. Reading the replies in this game is the responsibility of every player--it's why we're here! I think maybe we should leave it up to the player to ask in OOC if tactics have been discussed, if they are really pressed for time. Maybe a summary location where strategies have been posited and by whom is a fair compromise.
So I apologize if this has been answered but if I wanted to roll for something like, say, investigating the office, do I put that request in with a roll in the OOC or the IC? Or does it not matter?
So that is a fantastic question! Blind GM rolls are a common discussion in DnD and P2e. An investigation roll could be a blind GM roll, where I roll for you and tell you what Fleur might find in the area. This concept is predicated on the idea of eliminating metagaming. If you know you rolled a nat 1 for Fleur's Perception check, you may be tempted to try again, or not believe me when I tell you that you don't spot anything out of the ordinary.
This is a good opportunity for us to discuss this here as a group. Do players care to have Blind GM rolls for Perception-based rolls? If everyone would like to roll their own Perception, we can totally do that, and I'll keep an eye on metagaming.
My go-to has been to have Blind GM rolls for Perception, but I still like having the players roll the dice (just not looking at the result, which would be harder on RPG).
As a note, I wouldn't change Blind GM rolls for things like Recall Knowledge where I may need to lie to you depending on your roll ^_^.
@PatientBean As far as Fleur goes for right now, Investigation is a focused activity. You could Search the room with a Perception check (feel free to roll in your post), and when/if you find something of note, then you can Investigate it with another check.
Also, yeah you could totally put that request here in OOC or in IC.