So Boerd said
^
Indeed. Like I said, didn't expect too much activity when this first starts. For now, this RP's basically on hold until the other three or four peeps return.
So Boerd said
^
VoiD said
Hey everyone, sorry I haven't been around. I was on vacation in California, visiting the national parks and such. Unfortunately I had no reception/internet connection about 99.5% of the trip. I'll be posting my first IC soon in any case.
Flooby Badoop said
Hm, if I ever do a reboot of this, I'm thinking of letting everyone keep all their provinces instead of splitting them off to vassals, but then making everyone vassals who will split 40 points between them. That'd cause much less confusion.
FortunesFaded said
Ooh, yeah that would have been easier.However I'm definitely hoping that *this* version works out well and there will be no need for a reboot!
Got my PC back , will be posting Merc NS soon
Sadko said
Is there still lands available for my kingdom? Would be lovely, even if just a small one.
Outcast said
I'm still here. If this keeps going, awesome, I'll be with it 'till the end. If you decide to reboot, make sure you let me know. I ain't ready to get rid of Lord Torak Harvestar just yet.
FortunesFaded said
Hm.. What if, in the case of inactivity, rather than scheduling a reboot, simply (after a certain period of time) allowing a new player who wants to join the choice of either A.) inheriting the kingdom as is, inactive player's characters and all, or B.) Having their own House overthrow the inactive players' House to take those lands. The vassals could then perhaps choose (based on their loyalty to the old Lord, or other traits that Flooby used to define them) to stick with the new lord or become independent. The latter would allow greater potential for conflict in the game (and avoid the whole 'lets all sign NAPs and trade treaties and live happily ever after' syndrome), and greater potential for expansion. Just a thought :)