1. Home
  2. Arena Roleplay
4 Guests viewing this page

[OOC] Arena Chat Thread Page 11

Join Status: Jump-in
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
That is a metric fuckton of points to take.home, especially in a bigger ranked tournament. WOTW gets 16 alone.

How about the winning pot be, in that idea, based on how.many the winner faced. For an 8 man that's 3, at say 200, so 600 points total.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
They'll still get points. So long as they don't gamble them away.

Hahaha.

So what Di the rest of you think?

100 Points for winning.
25 for losing
50 for a draw
150-200 for a tournament win.
Wager system they causes a loss of points if you bet and lose. Perhaps a minimum of 25 points for the wager. Or betting of.items instead.

If Mahz can't code this in then perhaps someone could create a thread and run the numbers. Same thread could be sort of a depository for current/completed ranked fights. Including in such the participants, judge, and wager. Like a link to the fight.


Bumping this. Cast your vote so I can record it
Hidden 9 yrs ago → 9 yrs ago Post by Skallagrim
Raw —
Avatar of Skallagrim

Skallagrim Walker between Worlds

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Because we know no matter how many apply to be a tourney people don't always post. You can make it 100 or 150 per each person who makes at least 2/3 posts before dropping out. The idea of winning a tourney should be worth entering. Or make the tourney worth X amount for first second place. So perhaps 1000/750 for 1/2nd place.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
I'm just worried about the amount of catch up most will have to do, 1000 to the leader, and most will.need 10 just to catch up. Ultimately I'm fine with the first second and third place points, and if the rest are fine with it, then it can be official. Gotta be fairly democratic. hahaha.

In mine I try to replace them, if.its early enough.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Skallagrim
Raw —
Avatar of Skallagrim

Skallagrim Walker between Worlds

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Well I guess but honestly there is going to be a divide already between really good fighters and the average. I would rather face the best than the average.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Innue
Raw —
Avatar of Innue

Innue Sheep God

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Maybe make it so tournament points (or a certain amount) are only for gambling and don't count towards point total, so if you can incentivize it with a lot of points without completely making it impossible in some cases for someone to catch up.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
As would I.

How about thus for the mind.

Using the point wager system. Say everyone involved puts up X amount of points.

Going th 100 with 8 people.

Winner gets 400. Second gets 250-300. Third gets 100-150
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
I.kinda think me and Innue had a similar idea there.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Skallagrim
Raw —
Avatar of Skallagrim

Skallagrim Walker between Worlds

Member Seen 3 yrs ago
Innue. Interesting. So people entering are given a kitty to bet with.
Hidden 9 yrs ago → 9 yrs ago Post by MelonHead
Raw —
Avatar of MelonHead

MelonHead The Fighting Fruit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago
I think getting a total bonus of 100 X however many people you defeated is the best way to regulate it. It makes it more simple as a gauge around the board, remember that there are a lot of tourneys that spring up and people choosing their own values for the victory could skew the leaderboards. Where-as no one can complain that whatever the circumstances beating multiple people in a row deserves an added bonus, and it will regulate itself by providing more of a bonus in individual tournaments based on how many people you yourself faced and defeated.

And ultimately, someone who wins a tournament (with the average number of people you have to beat to obtain victory usually falling around 3-4) probably deserves 300-400 points outright, that will set them above the rest, but they would still be reachable within double that many individual victories (which are easier to obtain after all, not requiring the win streak.)
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
So at the moment we're at wagable points(gained via tournament used for waging in normal fights)
100 X Each Victor
Points per everyone who posts
Points wages by everyone then distributed among top three.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Little Bird
Raw —
Avatar of Little Bird

Little Bird Wings On the Wind

Member Seen 0-24 hrs ago
I think getting a total bonus of 100 X however many people you defeated is the best way to regulate it. It makes it more simple as a gauge around the board, remember that there are a lot of tourneys that spring up and people choosing their own values for the victory could skew the leaderboards. Where-as no one can complain that whatever the circumstances beating multiple people in a row deserves an added bonus, and it will regulate itself by providing more of a bonus in individual tournaments based on how many people you yourself faced and defeated.

And ultimately, someone who wins a tournament (with the average number of people you have to beat to obtain victory usually falling around 3-4) probably deserves 300-400 points outright, that will set them above the rest, but they would still be reachable within double that many individual victories (which are easier to obtain after all, not requiring the win streak.)


That doesn't sound quite like a bonus though; It's basically just getting the same 100 points per battle, except that a tournament is a bit more taxing to get to that score. Maybe making the final round worth the double points?

So Round 1 = +100
Round 2 = +100
Final Round (ASsumed 8-man tournament) = +200
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by MelonHead
Raw —
Avatar of MelonHead

MelonHead The Fighting Fruit

Member Seen 4 yrs ago
<Snipped quote by MelonHead>

That doesn't sound quite like a bonus though; It's basically just getting the same 100 points per battle, except that a tournament is a bit more taxing to get to that score. Maybe making the final round worth the double points?

So Round 1 = +100
Round 2 = +100
Final Round (ASsumed 8-man tournament) = +200


Eh? The 100 x people fought is the bonus, I'm an advocate for still receiving 100 points for every fight you win within the tournament.

(Simple explanation)
1st round won, 100
2nd round won, 200
3rd round won, 300

Beat three people +300

Total points from tournament, 600.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
I can see tournaments are going to be a big thing. Will the points for all sanctioned ranked tournaments shave a static point total?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by ImportantNobody
Raw —
Avatar of ImportantNobody

ImportantNobody

Member Seen 4 yrs ago
(Simple explanation)
1st round won, 100
2nd round won, 200
3rd round won, 300

Beat three people +300

Total points from tournament, 600.


I agree with this.

So if your character looses their sword, it would be funny if they find a slightly different colored sword for the next battle. But on a serious note, if you do loose your sword, if it's reasonable they could get another one then I don't see a problem with it. The people betting should know how rare the equipment would be.

Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by ShidenBlades
Raw —

ShidenBlades Here to have fun!

Member Seen 10 mos ago
At this point I am indifferent towards what we use. I just want something so we can get started.

In the end, it will end up with the better individuals out distancing the less skilled writers. Which isn't a bad thing. Might as well stick with something simple. So I vote for your idea Rilla.
Hidden 9 yrs ago → 9 yrs ago Post by Little Bird
Raw —
Avatar of Little Bird

Little Bird Wings On the Wind

Member Seen 0-24 hrs ago
<Snipped quote by Wayward>

Eh? The 100 x people fought is the bonus, I'm an advocate for still receiving 100 points for every fight you win within the tournament.

(Simple explanation)
1st round won, 100
2nd round won, 200
3rd round won, 300

Beat three people +300

Total points from tournament, 600.


Ah. I musunderstood you it. Makes more sense then.

This would also mean that the one-and-dones will get 0. I suppose I can live with that. Though that would depend on the style of tournament.

Or would losers still get the 25?
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
I don't think they should just pop up sort a new sword all Willy nilly because they lost the last one. Otherwise wagering may as well be off the table.

Blades, you have to be more specific. :P
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by ImportantNobody
Raw —
Avatar of ImportantNobody

ImportantNobody

Member Seen 4 yrs ago
I don't think they should just pop up sort a new sword all Willy nilly because they lost the last one. Otherwise wagering may as well be off the table.


I'm mainly saying for things like a steel sword that you could logically find almost anywhere. It's kind of their fault for accepting a wager for such a common item or they just want that character's for whatever reason. Maybe to add insult to injury. Now if you were wagering the ultimate sword of dragon exploding then you'd not be able to justify finding another one.
Hidden 9 yrs ago Post by Rilla
Raw —
GM
Avatar of Rilla

Rilla SuperNova Generation / The Lazy Storyteller

Member Seen 2 mos ago
That's what I thought you meant. mundane items and the like can easily be replaced. But I don't suspect most will be going for those anyway without some underlying reason.
↑ Top
4 Guests viewing this page
© 2007-2024
BBCode Cheatsheet