You're basically on point tho, I'm just waxing hella poetic. How are you Beowulf?

I would've posted my favorite anime Cory in the House, but...

You're just not worth it. GOMENASAIA. OHAYOUGAZAIMSU.

@SirBeowulf@Darcs

Since the drama is gone now...



I like tanks. (Especially Russian ones.)

Pssh, That's So Raven > Cory in the House

Bandwagon babbys, will they ever learn

#GOTspoilers #triggered

@Monochromatic Rainbow



God, I also love sleek modern tanks.

@SirBeowulf

Poland can't into space, but they can into advanced technology.

@Monochromatic RainbowYou don't understand. That IS their rocket ship.

Oh man, are we posting tanks, because--

@Shotgun BearTank Girl is my jam

Go time. Expect Reviews.

@Aeonumbra

Gimme the full rundown of technical questions you said you had(?), because it's absolutely better that I answer them here than in PM.

@Shotgun Bear Absolutely, as soon as I get to it. You're either first on the list, or next, I can't remember if there was a CS I need to read before yours. Please hang around a bit, if you can. =)

@Aeonumbra

Hey, I'm just glad you're getting around to it. No need to rush yourself; I'd rather have a meticulous GM who gets things done just a little late than one who rushes right through shit and accepts everything.

However, I've got about an hour-twenty as of this post before I'm off to go do terrible things with terrible people, so keep in mind that I may take a long time to answer your questions after that timeframe.

@Arcanaut If you're going to take tips as somebody being dickish, then we're going to have a problem. Yes, I understand the point you were conveying, but I did not state you had to change it, and I was not rude about it. Do not mistake rudeness for a synonym of abrasiveness. I merely suggest wording it differently to provide a clearer understanding, without factually stating that- as it appears- in any given situation in a room full of people, regardless of other factors, he could fight his way out. It was a writing tip, not a dickish remark, chill.

"Muh Honor- While he isn't always challenging people these days, when Roland is directly challenged by another person he will refuse to back down no matter how bad the odds are. At other times his personal code may cause him to be needlessly reckless such as not using his powers to incapacitate someone, or, letting someone live when there's a chance they may comeback for revenge."

I think my confusion here was perhaps the lack of the red commas? The clarification I was looking for was the interpretation of his recklessness, because it is stating "such as not using his powers to incapacitate someone" which means that he does not use his powers to prohibit their ability to combat him, suggesting that he kills them and that murderous tendency is what is reckless about him. Then you go on to say "or (modifier: not--letting someone live when there's a chance they may comeback for revenge." which is modified by the previously stated, "not", as I placed in red there. Point being there is that it is reckless in some way because he does -not- let them live?

That was were my confusion was at there, that single little word just threw me off entirely. Because there is no comma to seperate the two independant clauses, the "or" builds a distinction between them, modified by the "not", implying that his recklessness was caused by "not" doing either of those actions. Commas are important bruh Q_Q

Also, thank you for your concern, I am quite well rested now.

@Shotgun Bear Ah, I will do yours next then.

"Muh Honor- While he isn't always challenging people these days, when Roland is directly challenged by another person he will refuse to back down no matter how bad the odds are. At other times his personal code may cause him to be needlessly reckless such as not using his powers to incapacitate someone, or, letting someone live when there's a chance they may comeback for revenge."

Alternatively, did the statement mean "At other times his personal code may cause him to be needlessly reckless such as incapacitating someone in ways not involving the use of his powers, or letting someone live when there's a chance they may come back for revenge"?

By refraining from using his powers in combat he would be recklessly endangering himself, and potentially others, rather than just using his powers to end the battle quickly and decisively.

@Shotgun Bear Do keep in mind that I am abrasive-- I say things directly and without filter, I do not intend to be rude or dickish.

Now, lets begin.

Appearance:


Backstory


Gear




Powers and Technical Questions
[Please be aware of the difference between Magnetism Manipulation, Bio-organic Magnetism, And Electromagnetism Manipulation.]

@SimplyJohn I like the alternative phrasing, no confusion there. It should still be amended though, as that is what I believe @Arcanaut was going for.

@SirBeowulf I skimmed over your sheet again and I did not find anything that presently jumps out as downright wrong- perhaps a bit lackluster and a tad bland here and there- but that's not necessarily a fault.

@Aeonumbra

The images are meant to go hand in hand with the bio, being that I drew them. I'm aware of the taboo and if you'd done a closer reading of the Appearance section, I think you'll find that it's part of her personality. Yes, it's ridiculous and over the top but she is characterized that way. I'm sorry that our personal tastes conflict, but the character is a study in contrasts. Chutney is the big fuckoff hammer. She has the hat and a scarf, too, so, you know. Quasi-shade.

'Hot-freeze' means that, if there were a bunch of iron filings (in this instance, though it can be anything magnetic) in the air on a particularly cloudy day, those filings would be able to connect their attraction fields and totally solidify a cloud by attracting the vapor to them. What I was really trying to get at is that Great Attractor works with gases as much as liquids and solids. Great Attractor itself isn't a magnetic law and was never intended to be. I was exercising the creative freedom thing to make a power I thought was kinda neat and not all that excessive. On the subject of weird abilities, I'm totally fine with not having bio-organic magnetism. I don't care to have powerful characters, just fun and interesting ones.

The whole bone thing is just the sheer force of their personal magnetism. It's automatically resetting her to a stable state. That I admit to being a touch hard to swallow. However, using force to meld things together still happens, it's not impossible.

The whole thought behind the cauterization is that the body itself is a maintained whole, but breaks in it also break the pattern. Thus, it sucks itself back together and the polarities, naturally rapidly switching, create a rapid friction. The heat isn't constant and I think you took my imagery a little literally with the 'raging fire' thing. Wait a minute, you're allowing the moon to not be, but warm people is too much? The basic idea of her power is that her unwounded body is a 'stable state' and lacerations really fuck that up. She can't do knife fights.

The scarf is just a scarf...Poncho. It keeps things off of her like a poncho does, it doesn't nullify things. It came before the powers in her bio.

But in all seriousness, the design came first and it, like Schatz, is silly and over the top. It's not her being 'da sexiest,' it's just fun. I'd really rather not have to take the time to do a total redesign over taste, because you did emphasize 'creative freedom' in your Interest Check.


Oh, and I take huge exception to implying that Schatz is a Sue just because of the way she looks. That is the epitome of judging a book by its cover. I know you don't mean to come off as rude but rule one's ''Respect your GM'' and you state within it that you'll try to do the same.