@Zero Hex
I would be fine with such changes along with an example of how it works, like how Yoshua had suggested.

<Snipped quote by Phobos>

Okay so here's the funny thing then. A number of the abilities proposed there? They're exactly the same as what I had before, except slightly rewritten. They do away with the immunities to powers that take away all character agency, which is a different can of worms given my dislike over those things, but the ability to improve perception, amplifying his sensory abilities, focusing on positioning and whatnot? It was all there already. In fact, the ability to generate a field of perception is a straight upgrade over something I was told to get rid of, because it's going from having trained senses to a legitimate localized danger sense.

And I did explain my abilities. In detail, both thematic and in application, to the same extent as many a canon power considering they're oft-defined by user personality. I did it when I replied to the first message telling me to get rid of these things you're now telling me are fine, along with defining other things such as explaining that having grit and being used enough to fighting to adapt to battlefields and being quick to react does not make for completely ignoring all damage and effects, or how I was essentially spending superpower slots to further define how my character will fight with a sword. I'm starting to think no one actually bothered to read any of that, considering it was never really addressed beyond a fun fact video I put up.

Does this game operate on bias? I'm getting the feeling that it does. Zobozun was ganged up on and called a troll for defending his character concept and when he understandably got upset he was the one punished, and then he was kicked from the game for being "disruptive". I explained my abilities in detail to try and work things out, then I'm told to suck it up and just change everything. Essentially identical, if not superior, abilities are then approved when posted by another player. Is this because I didn't accept the invitation to the skype group or because I had the temerity to correct someone on what a mary sue is?

I admit a couple of my powers might have crossed the line because I'm so zealous in trying to avoid powers that take away control of a character in a setting where there's no chance of failure or mechanics to constrain them in some way, but what about the rest? Tell me again I haven't been judged unfairly when apparently 3/5 of the things I had are just fine when proposed by someone else, yet I was told to get rid of it all and the only help I received after asking for it several times came from another player.

<Snipped quote by Phobos>

Okay so here's the funny thing then. A number of the abilities proposed there? They're exactly the same as what I had before, except slightly rewritten. They do away with the immunities to powers that take away all character agency, which is a different can of worms given my dislike over those things, but the ability to improve perception, amplifying his sensory abilities, focusing on positioning and whatnot? It was all there already. In fact, the ability to generate a field of perception is a straight upgrade over something I was told to get rid of, because it's going from having trained senses to a legitimate localized danger sense.

And I did explain my abilities. In detail, both thematic and in application, to the same extent as many a canon power considering they're oft-defined by user personality. I did it when I replied to the first message telling me to get rid of these things you're now telling me are fine, along with defining other things such as explaining that having grit and being used enough to fighting to adapt to battlefields and being quick to react does not make for completely ignoring all damage and effects, or how I was essentially spending superpower slots to further define how my character will fight with a sword. I'm starting to think no one actually bothered to read any of that, considering it was never really addressed beyond a fun fact video I put up.

<Snipped quote by Phobos>
I admit a couple of my powers might have crossed the line because I'm so zealous in trying to avoid powers that take away control of a character in a setting where there's no chance of failure or mechanics to constrain them in some way, but what about the rest? Tell me again I haven't been judged unfairly when apparently 3/5 of the things I had are just fine when proposed by someone else, yet I was told to get rid of it all and the only help I received after asking for it several times came from another player.

I honestly don't see what's your complaint here. According to you,"They're exactly the same as what I had before, except slightly rewritten," in response to the proposed changes in your abilities. If that was truly the case then I doubt you'd be whinin over it cause any normal person would just probably interpret that as having them nerfed in some manner. But then again, I may be wrong, cause since it's you specifically, you're going to try to scavenge around for anything that looks helpful in order to argue a case that has been long since passed.

In response to the second paragraph, you didn't explain your skills in detail, so don't make me re pull up your cs again. Scratch that:

Wait I thought you said you explained it in detail? Oops, I'm sorry, you're right, you did explain it in detail. But was that amount of detailed information sufficient? No. Despite the good amount of text you put down for the skill, it might as well have said "Supermman can fly" if this same amount of detail was applied to a Superman char. If you didn't realize it already, I'm saying your skills have detail, but just not in the way you meant it. Like I said in response to your char's third skill "how is that possible?". If a skill like this one requires me or any other normal person to hunt down the creator in order to properly understand it, then it's not very detailed(Unless in the rare or uncommon case it was super complex which it's not).

If you think it does, then it does apparently. I guess that would explain why everybody involved wasted time out of their day to gang up on you in the form of posts like these: Wait hopefully some of this helps? Oh I get. They're ganging up on you in secret, sneaky bastards xD I mean it would make total sense for them to do so since you're implying that you're being ganged up on like Zobozun for defending your character concept just like him right? Stopping with the blatant sarcasm, you're simply looking for silly reasons to rationalize why your char won't get accepted...when you should be looking directly at the stuff in front of you(I feel like I said this twice).

Oh wow!!! You just gave me the magic words to hammer the nail in the coffin!!! According to what you said in the highlighted quote, you admit that some of your powers are op(Or crossed the line if we're being technical). Despite that fact, in the very beginning of this nonsense, you had a rebuttal for each and every single skill I pointed out. What does that mean? That means you can be proven wrong...even to you. Not only that but by having a zealous mindset(You said it first, not me), you're at risk of being biased in favor of your cs regardless of the facts presented against it.

Honestly, I'm starting to get annoyed by your responses. Like every single time recently, it's always you complaining and it just so happens that it's about the same exact thing. Like why? Both me and Phobos who are two gms gave you the final say, yet you are still yapping on about it? Nearly everyone who has read it and voiced their opinion agreed that your char's op. I also went as far as having your skills looked at by two retired rpers(One who trained me(Or tried at least)) that wanted to vote in your favor solely to piss me off. You know what one of them said while looking at your Yaiba skill? They was like" It's not that bad," stopped talking suddenly just to make sure he read it before saying,"What dafuq?".

"and the only help I received after asking for it several times came from another player." And don't give me or anyone that sorry excuse for help cause it was a complaint in reality.

You think merely because you asked a question, it's asking for help? I'm not stupid, I know exactly what asking for help is and it's surely not that. Even if that was considered asking for help, I did you with my rebuttal which was basically me saying "broaden your horizons" in order to expand your sense of creativity. Was that not sufficient for your interpretation of the word help? Well maybe you should've been more direct with what you wanted help with. Besides, I said this at the end of my last response "Also, like I mentioned, you can always ask me or one of the gms for help and we can try to provide some innovative stuff for you char." so that's on you if you didn't get the help you needed.

Though I know there's no way in hell you'll see reason in this post, I hope for your sake you do. I'm out and goodnight Zero ^-^

@Zero Hex

Annnd this is the first and last time I'm going to step into this conversation. So~ I'm going to get right to the point which I assume you already know by now, but I'll explain myself a little first.

So Zero, it's clearly obvious your original Zanpakuto idea wont get accepted, not in this Bleach Roleplay anyway. However even if we applied heavy nerfes to it...it wouldn't be the Zanpakuto it once was, thus you would not be happy...I'm going to assume here and say you wont be happy with any Zanpakuto that isn't your original idea, thus if you got accepted with one that wasn't...you'd be unhappy, and that would in turn make you unhappy with perhaps the GM's, maybe even the other players but most of all you'd be unhappy in the Roleplay. Now you can argue this but I can clearly see how this would affect your time if you were to go any further in this RP and I have a few simple things to say to you.

Is this all worth it?

Is it actually worth going through all of this just to get into this Roleplay? I'm sure you've got a big headache from all this and feel pretty sick and tired...and at that point wouldn't it be better to just walk away? No point continuing on in something you don't enjoy.

I mean it's pretty basic common sense to not go through with something you don't want to do unless the benefits are great. I don't see great benefits from all this...

Now I can get to the final point. I don't want arguing about this, I want you to just walk out of the RP and be like "well it was at least worth the shot" so it didn't go well...shit happens, we didn't accept your idea...move on. I can guarantee you that you wont get along with us (The GM's) and even some of the other players, so for your sake and our sake...I have to tell you to leave the RP. I don't want to use the word "kick" but you know what I mean.