Yo can we silence/maim/kill commies, anarchists, and others on the far-left because of their history with wanting me/my people/my family dead, as well as their history in restricting my freedoms and condemning millions to unhappiness and suffering? They're inherently dangerous, so me coming across one would be like a self-defense situation, but they've already have made the first move by professing themselves as communists, so I would have to run at the with a melee weapon or pick them off from afar with some sort of firearm. Is that cool?

Why do they want your family dead my man.

<Snipped quote by SleepingSilence>

MR GORBACHEV

@Nytem4re what is your argument then

Well, I mean, if it wasn't plainly obvious I'm just going to back out. No point in arguing with someone who doesn't put much effort into making a thoughtful response.

have a good day.

<Snipped quote by Ace of Hearts>

Well, I mean, if it wasn't plainly obvious I'm just going to back out. No point in arguing with someone who doesn't put much effort into making a thoughtful response.

have a good day.

cool. you might get off on debating like, people who think what japan/the US even did to vietnam was right, but i'm not down for that

hope u have a good one too. crack open some cold ones with the bois.

@Fabricant451 Except it doesn't. And you acting like a cunt without the self awareness that your previous behavior wasn't any better, just gives me no reason to not do otherwise.

@Fabricant451 Except it doesn't. And you acting like a cunt without the self awareness that your previous behavior wasn't any better, just gives me no reason to not do otherwise.

You honestly think that defending fucking jokes is on the same level as this childish tantrum? You've taken everything personally here. I don't even get involved in this topic when I have nothing to contribute (and even then that's debatable) while you're over here being super passive aggressive and trying to act holier than thou.

Would you worship the god you do or do not had you been born in India? Would you believe that violence is inherently bad and that all views must be respected if you were a slave in the American South? No, you probably wouldn't. You hold the values you do because of what culture you were born into, what ideology is in power where that culture exists, and the other socioeconomic conditions you were born into. If I was born to some well-off family in the suburbs of California I'd probably be making the exact opposite argument that I am now.

The American constitution is not the tablets brought down by Moses.

Didn't really reply much to this, but I'd also like to add that Moral Relativism can "excuse" the immoral behavior of other countries simply because of a cultural difference.

Moral Relativism has some use, don't get me wrong. But claiming you can't compare and contrast is really a moot point.

Nearly everyone in the world can say killing innocent people is wrong, it's a shared value, most people are repulsed by murder.

Let's look at the events in Chechnya. There are literally concentration camps killing LGBT people there, and the police reportedly are telling their parents to kill their children if they are gay.

Are we going to say, morality is relative, homosexuality is seen as taboo there, so don't judge them for killing gay people?

I really hope the answer is no.

@Fabricant451 Really just outright calling you a cunt and I'm still passive aggressive? <.< You can't even help yourself when it comes to repeating yourself, can you?

Yes, you 'not' calling me a douche, is a 'personal' insult. Makes me think your acting just as poorly, except you did it first. And yes, I'm better than you because aside from dealing with select members boring stabs against me. I'm not spending the rest of my time on here "joking" by saying sexist shit. I frankly doubt you are joking, because I've never seen you act kind to anyone you disagreed with ever. Give your own victim status a rest. You say stupid crude shit and only stupid crude shit. I'm well aware I'm speaking with a troll, I guess consider yourself lucky I have nothing better to do for 24 hours. <.<

What the fuck brought this on.

@Fabricant451 Really just outright calling you a cunt and I'm still passive aggressive? <.< You can't even help yourself when it comes to repeating yourself, can you?

I was talking collectively, not specifically. And technically you didn't call me a cunt. You said 'acting like a cunt'. Not quite the same thing. But I mean if you want to openly call me a cunt, that's your prerogative. Free speech and all that.

Yes, you 'not' calling me a douche, is a 'personal' insult. Makes me think your acting just as poorly, except you did it first.

I didn't call you a douche. I might have thought you were but I kept it to myself. I may disagree with people but I don't hate someone for the disagreement.

And yes, I'm better than you because aside from dealing with select members boring stabs against me. I'm not spending the rest of my time on here "joking" by saying sexist shit.

What sexist shit have I said? What actual, genuine sexist shit have I said? This comes off as you disagreeing with my sense of humor more than anything else.

I frankly doubt you are joking, because I've never seen you act kind to anyone you disagreed with ever.

What about Dynamo? He and I have had a number of disagreements and I'm cool with him. I mean, he's cool by me.

Give your own victim status a rest.

What?

You say stupid crude shit and only stupid crude shit.

Are you referring to my status updates here?

I'm well aware I'm speaking with a troll, I guess consider yourself lucky I have nothing better to do for 24 hours. <.<

If I'm a troll then you're on some Andy Kaufman level troll shit, man.

Nyt, Didge and other lads,

I get what you are trying to accomplish but it's pretty shit of an idea to try to debate someone who said he doesn't want to - and proven hour isn't smart enough to - debate. I'd quit it until the other party matures a bit.

>imblyign

Yes I know the irony of me writing this fug off

@SleepingSilence

If you think that Fabricant is being a troll then you have no-one to blame for that but yourself. She doesn't wake up in the morning and make the conscious decision to go round and shitpost as many people as possible. Turns out that if you make asinine remarks, you're going to get the same calibre of response back at you. Do see how that works? You have nothing better to do for twenty-four hours? Is your life really so barren that you would rather spend your time typing away like some "fearsome" keyboard warrior, adamant about enforcing your point of view onto others because you're so desperate for recognition or to make yourself heard, or whatever it is that you kids crave these days? Perhaps we should set up a Patreon, or a Kickstarter campaign for the guild to all chip in so we can buy you a box of fidget spinners.

Oh boy, someone on the internet called you a rude word - how are you going to cope? Maybe we should just forgo the fidget spinner fundraiser and go straight to arranging some therapy, you're going to need it after being called a douche by someone on an internet forum. But how can I sit here and so brazenly defend Fabricant, you might ask? Well bucko, the answer to that is very simple: I've known her for a long time, she's one of the most reasonable and intelligent individuals I've ever had the pleasure of knowing - provided that you're also a reasonable person, which based on what I've read you are certainly not. You come across as brash, passive-aggressive (Hey, look at that I used your favourite phrase!) and overly defensive, which I suppose fits your signature quite aptly.

I'm not going to say you're acting like a cunt, I'm saying you are a cunt - and a babyish one at that. Maybe we should start putting badges on forum topics with a big cross on some and a tick on others, so you know when to shut your mouth and when to open it - but that would probably confuse you, you might see the cross and think "Oh, X marks the spot! Better start being a knucklefucker in this topic!"

If there's any moderator around, feel free to throw some form of consequence my way.

So Wade's ghost haunts us on.

Hell hath quite a lot of fury like an autist's scorn.

*eye rolls until they fall out of my head* Well that marks off 3 accounts belonging to one user because they can't stand on their own. I've had my fun, can only handle so much stupid at once. <.<

When will the mods come lmao

*eye rolls until they fall out of my head* Well that marks off 3 accounts belonging to one user because they can't stand on their own. I've had my fun, can only handle so much stupid at once. <.<

Yeah, man. I'm sending my wave of alts at you because you called me a cunt on the internet.

@Fabricant451 Now that, was an actual joke. Figure since you joke so much you'd get it. But still too much stupid I have to deal with. <.<

I am surprised free speech has been lowered to the level where it is considered "enabling" to allow people with competing or even outright morally evil opinions and motivations to speak their mind. No less, one is some how unacceptable but a myriad of others, especially those far more powerful and more influential in this generation, are permitted. Are we legitimately worried about Nazis of all things in this time? Is there some giant oppositional force holding a metaphorical gun to the head of the United States, let alone the world? A fairly blatant double standard to focus on one group of detestable people but sweep the rest under the rug.

This is not comparing Nazis to Communists, Antifa to Fraternal Order of Alt Knights, Black Lives Matter to the Ku Klux Klan, and so on. They are all guilty of various crimes under their banners; everything from the Haymarket affair to the more recent Dallas shooting. If you are going to condemn the "Alt-Right Nazi Pro-White Nationalist" people who are exercising their freedom of speech, as they are permitted up until violence and action on their words, then you are expected to be held to the same standard with your "Socialist Black Lives Matter Antifa" member whose organization allowed a military style engagement to massacre policemen who were trying to maintain order. There is hardly, in fact, no difference in the two when their words become actions to injure or kill. Neither are maintaining civil order or the protection of others and both to their own extents are inciting violence; when it happens, both lose their rights.

You can mingle the details as you want - which is the reality, in that not everyone on either side is to blame - but ignoring the reality that they are two opposites of the same spectrum that often utilize violence is being willfully selective and woefully dishonest. I might have a greater issue with Communists in this time than I do Nazis, yet for no moment do I excuse the latter or support them. They are just as much my enemy and contrarian to my beliefs as the other, just significantly less prevalent in number and influence. One is just glorified by the ignorant and touted as some great ideal while the other stands as testament that their ideology is still evil.

Nyt, Didge and other lads,

I get what you are trying to accomplish but it's pretty shit of an idea to try to debate someone who said he doesn't want to - and proven hour isn't smart enough to - debate. I'd quit it until the other party matures a bit.

>imblyign

Yes I know the irony of me writing this fug off

we defeated nazis in the 40s with calm and reasoned debate

cry about the chinese being better than you some more, you fucking baby