Fun fact: Booster Gold was the first official comic character I ever RPed as. And for about five months, too, so not too shabby.

<Snipped quote by Retired>

First comic book character I RPed as was the Question, and that was only like, a year ago. Still enough time to cement me as 'that guy who does the Question in DC RPs', so not too shabby.

<Snipped quote by Simple Unicycle>

Didn't realize that RP (forget which one, but I know you applied as Question in a game I was in a year ago) was your first comic game.

<Snipped quote by Retired>

Ehhh, wasn't the first, but it was the first that didn't die after a few weeks or only feature OCs. So I consider it to be the first "real" one.

<Snipped quote by Simple Unicycle>

That's like some church girl logic to maintain purity as long as possible.

<Snipped quote by Retired>

Hey, any loophole's a good loophole.

Oh, and think you're mixing stuff up for which RP I'm talking about, you're referring to Absolute Comics, I'm referring to this.

Oh, and think you're mixing stuff up for which RP I'm talking about, you're referring to Absolute Comics, I'm referring to this.

Hey, any loophole's a good loophole.

Oh, and think you're mixing stuff up for which RP I'm talking about, you're referring to Absolute Comics, I'm referring to this.

<Snipped quote by Simple Unicycle>

I was about to comment how big the OOC thread was, but then I did the math and realized this OOC has like 3,000 more posts.

<Snipped quote by Simple Unicycle>

Psh. You act like I care about the details.

<Snipped quote by Simple Unicycle>
Smells like Kid Lantern in here all of a sudden...

Put me down as being opposed to the second character idea – and I mean, no ifs, no buts, fully opposed.

I don't think as a community that we've shown we can support games while splitting our attention across multiple characters. In fact, all of the evidence up to this point has shown the exact opposite. I don't think it's worth endangering what we have here – a formula that is working – to indulge secondary ideas people have that they aren't committed to enough to drop their primary characters to pursue.

Put me down as being opposed to the second character idea – and I mean, no ifs, no buts, fully opposed.

I don't think as a community that we've shown we can support games while splitting our attention across multiple characters. In fact, all of the evidence up to this point has shown the exact opposite. I don't think it's worth endangering what we have here – a formula that is working – to indulge secondary ideas people have that they aren't committed to enough to drop their primary characters to pursue.

Put me down as being opposed to the second character idea – and I mean, no ifs, no buts, fully opposed.

I don't think as a community that we've shown we can support games while splitting our attention across multiple characters. In fact, all of the evidence up to this point has shown the exact opposite. I don't think it's worth endangering what we have here – a formula that is working – to indulge secondary ideas people have that they aren't committed to enough to drop their primary characters to pursue.

On the secondary-characters front, while nothing's written in stone, I've definitely spent more time than I should shopping the "teen hero named after a bird that starts with an R" aisle.

On the secondary-characters front, while nothing's written in stone, I've definitely spent more time than I should shopping the "teen hero named after a bird that starts with an R" aisle.

<Snipped quote by AndyC>
Raven?

Put me down as being opposed to the second character idea – and I mean, no ifs, no buts, fully opposed.

I don't think as a community that we've shown we can support games while splitting our attention across multiple characters. In fact, all of the evidence up to this point has shown the exact opposite. I don't think it's worth endangering what we have here – a formula that is working – to indulge secondary ideas people have that they aren't committed to enough to drop their primary characters to pursue.