@Fabricant451 I'm not arguing popularity, I'm not even saying that final fantasy 1 wasn't a landmark. I'm hesitant to call it a total pioneer, as Phantasy Star literally was relased 2 days afterwards, and had a female lead character to boot. But much like Resident Evil 1 just becuase a game was 'important' doesn't necessarily make it great or even good. I honestly dont think FF games suck (apart from 2 and 13) but I do think a whole half of them are dull/kinda boring/average and the others are decent, with maybe one or two being truly great. Which is the case for basically every longer running RPG series.
12 was widely acclaimed and was the first Final Fantasy game to get a perfect score in Famitsu. .
Hahahahahahaha guess what else got a perfect score by famitsu?
I'm glad you've come around to seeing the light which is Japanese RPG reviews!
When it comes to FF the games which are argued as the best are
4 by the throwback people
7 by the widespread consumers
6 by the 7-sucks hipsters and maybe maybe maybe
10 by some of the slightly younger weeb-ish crowd, but I understand they are a minority.
None of these games, (apart from 7 due to the music, presentation, and my own heavy personal bias for this game) can even make the case for being a pimple on Chrono Trigger's ass.
And yes Persona 5 despite the weeb army and hype train is probably the best JRPG of this decade. Final Fantasy 15 was a good effort, but it's clearly not as amazing as it wanted to be.
EDIT: Oh and 14 is irrelevant, its a different genre. What makes a good MMO isn't necessarily what makes a good JRPG experience. That's like saying Donkey Kong is a better platforming series than Mario, because Diddy Kong Racing is better than Mario Kart 64 (which isn't saying much).