@PlatinumSkink it is entirely possible, at least from what I have read in the other reviews, that I am simply predisposed to view your entry in the worst possible light. The style and execution rubbed me the wrong way to such a degree that I don't think I am capable of seeing any of its better aspects.
This is exactly part of the reason why I would like for there to be more judges than just myself for these Labours. Since I feel I was unable to given your entry a purely objective review, it likely deserved a different judge - which was impossible since I was the only one available. I gave you what I perceived to be a fair review, but the fact of the matter is that you might just be a victim of circumstance. I am certain that if another judge had been present I would have asked them to review it instead.
I have no idea how @mdk managed to coerce their crew to take on RPGC full-time. If I can even find one person per Labour to serve as an extra judge, I am already ahead of the curve...which is an unfortunate trend.
This is exactly part of the reason why I would like for there to be more judges than just myself for these Labours. Since I feel I was unable to given your entry a purely objective review, it likely deserved a different judge - which was impossible since I was the only one available. I gave you what I perceived to be a fair review, but the fact of the matter is that you might just be a victim of circumstance. I am certain that if another judge had been present I would have asked them to review it instead.
I have no idea how @mdk managed to coerce their crew to take on RPGC full-time. If I can even find one person per Labour to serve as an extra judge, I am already ahead of the curve...which is an unfortunate trend.