[OOC] Aurora, The Land of Twilight and Falsities

[Ashifili]

>As Damiann said, everyone here including myself has a life outside of the RPGuild that has to be maintained and balanced as best as they can
>Damiann

<Snipped quote by Melkor>

Damn, you real salty. It's like the GM can't have a life or anything, but good riddance.

@Zombehs

Sucks to be you, Zombs.

[chukklehed]

>As Damiann said, everyone here including myself has a life outside of the RPGuild that has to be maintained and balanced as best as they can
>Damiann

<Snipped quote by Zombehs>

Sucks to be you, Zombs.

@Ashifili

Look a bit higher on that page

[Ashifili]

Doesn't change the ignored Zombs though, does it? XD

[Gnar The Missing Link]

Why do you guys tease your GM so much? ;-;

Also, hm, I have decided that I will hold off a bit on writing a IC Post to allow more people to respond to things. I'll have something posted in the morning for those who have posted.

Also, congratulations to Team Taxpayers, for you guys are getting a couple of rewards in the morning~

<Snipped quote by Grey Star>

Hey man, if we play our cards just right, Team-B gets a freakin' pet dragon.

@SilverDawn

Actually, you guys might get more than just a Pet Colossal Dragon if you play your cards right.

Edit: Click This, I would like you to change Reversion by the way... It just seems a bit much and time-wonky so to speak. I'm a bit sitting here with Ashifili on things on not being too comfortable with it. If you can change it to something more reasonable, then Shannon would be accepted.

[Zombehs]

Doesn't change the ignored Zombs though, does it? XD

@Ashifili

Gnar-senpai can ignore me all he wants as long as I get showered with gifts and presents. :3

[Ashifili]

<Snipped quote by Ashifili>

Gnar-senpai can ignore me all he wants as long as I get showered with gifts and presents. :3

@Zombehs

And then I get put in charge of your group as well, and all the hand-holding ends.

[chukklehed]

Allow me to shed light again:

I assume your problem with Reversion is that it allows the user to "reverse any decision that was made", like some kind of temporal white out, but in my eyes, this is what Reversion is:

The ability to revert any PHYSICAL object to a previous state. The distinction is important. It means it cannot bring back the dead. It cannot negate energy attacks, it cannot restore lost enchantments or erase memories. Even if she heals someone's body, it does not mean she can save their life. Even if she repairs a damaged sword, it does not mean she can restore it's magic. It is not a do-over, it is advanced healing.

[Damiann47]

Yay for being a voice of reason, I might add that I typically don't see rude disagreements like this on the Guild, strange. Anyway I can wait until the morning, that's fine, I'll be waiting.
_{We'll be watching. *Cue X-Com music*}

[Click This]

Allow me to shed light again:

I assume your problem with Reversion is that it allows the user to "reverse any decision that was made", like some kind of temporal white out, but in my eyes, this is what Reversion is:

The ability to revert any PHYSICAL object to a previous state. The distinction is important. It means it cannot bring back the dead. It cannot negate energy attacks, it cannot restore lost enchantments or erase memories. Even if she heals someone's body, it does not mean she can save their life. Even if she repairs a damaged sword, it does not mean she can restore it's magic. It is not a do-over, it is advanced healing.

@chukklehed

Spot on, that's how I intended it to be. Really, it's just fancy flavor text for healing just so I can say revision/reversion. I'll make some changes, though.

[Ashifili]

@Click This
I hate magical healing.

Time to lobby for anti-healing magic weaponry on every hostile NPC ever.

[Gnar The Missing Link]

@chukklehed You have a good perceptive eye Chukkle.

See, I'll admit that I make mistakes with my eye since the ability can be misinterpreted. >_<

Admittedly, I've had players pull such shenanigans with misinterpreted understandings before which is why I'm usually cautious when accepting powers. Although, I do like it if things are written clearly, so then it's not hard for me as a GM to decide how strong or how powerful an ability is, and it makes misunderstandings like this easier to deal with!

Anyway, if that is how it works, then they should be fine.

[Click This]

Glad that's cleared up!

Looking at it again though, I decided to make a minute change to revision and changed reversion to something more interesting than healing. Hope that's acceptable.

[Ashifili]

Magical barrier > Normal Lock.

Just saying. Though I would think that neither would be something that you can take apart in a few seconds.

[chukklehed]

Hey, understanding is what I do best. If every any ability or piece of equipment is unclear, you can count on me to explain it.

[Click This]

Magical barrier > Normal Lock.

Just saying. Though I would think that neither would be something that you can take apart in a few seconds.

@Ashifili

That's why the 'or more' qualifier is there. :3

[chukklehed]

My two cents on the new additions, I thought the old version was cooler, because it opened up puzzle solutions like reverting a worn stone tablet back to a readable state, or a broken key or puzzle piece back to perfect condition. The new one is as bleh as it is questionable.

[Click This]

Interesting points. Not sure if I like see-sawing between ideas, though. I guess I'll finalize that in the morning, since conjuring ability sets at 4 in the morning isn't exactly the best time.

[kapuchu]

Hey, understanding is what I do best. If every any ability or piece of equipment is unclear, you can count on me to explain it.

@chukklehed

Oh! Oh! Do me! Do me! :D

[Whitepulse]

*waiting Dance*

[chukklehed]

Uhhh... I mean, there isn't really anything I can say about your power that you didn't already. I suppose I could speculate about how you might gain more transformations by spending time with a certain animal and coming to understand them, or about how you might later gain a full transformational ability rather than partial. I'm not exactly sure what you want me to talk about here.