You know I’m right deep in the center of your cockles.
@Inkarnate Way to cut out half of my message.
Never did I once say that it was "okay" for said people to "discriminate" against other genders/sexes. All I was saying(and am continuing to do so) is that people are free to choose which gender/sex they write with.
I think Nemaisaire is the only one who gave a somewhat halfway reasonable excuse in that maybe someone who is a chick who has a real life dude partner might not want to RP with other dudes because their real life partner would get jealous, which isn't sexism on the RPers part, just some enabling of sexism in their real life partner. (And they should totally get out of that relationship because WTF!)
<Snipped quote by Drache>
ALSO2, I think writing 'I wanna RP with women because it gets my rocks off' should be a perfectly valid reason to RP with women only. Not your business who I do and don't write with.
<Snipped quote by Odin>
not all people rp smut
It's perfectly morally acceptable to have standards, even on roleplaying forums. This includes the standards set for characters, settings, and plots. There is no moral obligation to not have standards, even on character genders.
It's that simple.
You're never going to be in a romantic or sexual relationship with your RP partner.
@Inkarnate Same deal.
If you think someone's morally bankrupt because they don't want to play with X gender and only allow Y's to apply to their interest check, click out of the thread and move on.
<Snipped quote by j8cob>
Then you're being sexist. I guess that's okay.
<Snipped quote by Drache>
Doesn't mean certain folks won't try, and even come close to success on the romantic part. Haven't heard any success stories. Have heard of ongoing romances on the guild based on 1x1 threads.
<Snipped quote by j8cob>
Not really. It is two different conflating issues. I disagree that it is acceptable to discriminate based on sex, gender, orientation, race, or anything mentioned prior. In fact, I believe Drache touched on this before. Obviously you disagree, but I don’t feel there is a rather strong argument for it being acceptable; but morals are like ethics – fluid and determinant on the individual. Such is why it is difficult to ever make an objective determination based on it.
<Snipped quote by Hillan>
Entirely agree.
<Snipped quote by Drache>
Nobody has any obligation, neither morally nor legally, to associate with anyone else. I have no obligation to like everyone, you have no obligation to interact with everyone, the guy down the street has no obligation to talk to everyone. It's not sexist, its an observation. People can, and will, do what they want.